Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,835
Easy there Aqualung/Karen…I think everyone knows what it says . There are about a million things that can change/happen between now and end of October (LOL) . If it stays it stays and if it goes it goes . We will find out soon enough . Not worth popping a blood vessel over . I’ll let you get back to taking care of your cats now and your flat earth .
On Reserve
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 24
This is an interesting difference between our MECs. We really love using LOAs and precedence to maintain our contract at 9E. I guess if we were closer to (or way past…) negotiations for a new contract, we might be a little more reluctant to keep adding them on.
This is what I really like about our MEC; however, it does require more forethought and strategic planning. This really allows things to be implemented quicker. I’m surprised more MEC’s have not adopted this method.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,572
Usually when management come to the MEC with an LOA it’s because they need something from you that’s worth more than what they’re willing to give you. DALPA refuses to play this game and will instead hold the entire section 6 negotiations hostage to get a good comprehensive contract. LOA tend to be better for the company in the long run than the pilots. They usually get some kind of permanent efficiency for a temporary fix to pilot problems.
Usually when management come to the MEC with an LOA it’s because they need something from you that’s worth more than what they’re willing to give you. DALPA refuses to play this game and will instead hold the entire section 6 negotiations hostage to get a good comprehensive contract. LOA tend to be better for the company in the long run than the pilots. They usually get some kind of permanent efficiency for a temporary fix to pilot problems.
Sure, except at Endeavor, we've been getting permanent fixes to our pilot problems, for temporary (and very minor) efficiency improvements for the company through our LOAs.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,768
Delta pilots don't want side letters for a few reasons but the pilot groups visceral reaction to side letters come from a lot of past, non-transparent agreements. Delta pilots would find out in post the union traded away some langauge for nothing months after it happened. There was blame to go around, but the rank and file blame the union and there is zero trust. Since the TA1 abomination was shot down years ago the pilots keep the MEC and their reps on a VERY short leash. Itll take a decade to build trust back, and the pilots to feel like their message is crystal clear to the volunteers. That message: "you work for us, no slick **** enrichening yourselves at our expense".
Usually when management come to the MEC with an LOA it’s because they need something from you that’s worth more than what they’re willing to give you. DALPA refuses to play this game and will instead hold the entire section 6 negotiations hostage to get a good comprehensive contract. LOA tend to be better for the company in the long run than the pilots. They usually get some kind of permanent efficiency for a temporary fix to pilot problems.
Also LOA’s can prevent negotiation fatigue where with lengthy contracts half way through one or both sides may start feeling that too much has been given or requested. Thereby, stalling the completion process.
Delta pilots don't want side letters for a few reasons but the pilot groups visceral reaction to side letters come from a lot of past, non-transparent agreements. Delta pilots would find out in post the union traded away some langauge for nothing months after it happened. There was blame to go around, but the rank and file blame the union and there is zero trust. Since the TA1 abomination was shot down years ago the pilots keep the MEC and their reps on a VERY short leash. Itll take a decade to build trust back, and the pilots to feel like their message is crystal clear to the volunteers. That message: "you work for us, no slick **** enrichening yourselves at our expense".
DALPHA is certainly not the only member in that club. And absolutely you need leadership/committee members you can trust. Regardless of which process you prefer.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,469
Negotiations in a regional world where you’re competing over pilots allows you to play the LOA game. It’s different at a legacy when by and large recruitment isn’t as much leverage. There’s merits to both, but one has to remember the relative sizes. Delta has more 737s than Edv has total planes, there’s way more to cover than patchwork LOAs would fix.
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 73
Negotiations in a regional world where you’re competing over pilots allows you to play the LOA game. It’s different at a legacy when by and large recruitment isn’t as much leverage. There’s merits to both, but one has to remember the relative sizes. Delta has more 737s than Edv has total planes, there’s way more to cover than patchwork LOAs would fix.
Pilots at majors tend to find most of their leverage in the full RLA process, primarily with the threat of a potential strike if an agreement isn’t met. So that’s probably why we don’t see as many LOAs. The threat of a strike at a regional just doesn’t give pilots the same leverage as it does at a mainline.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post