Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2017, 06:37 PM
  #17751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prex8390's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,147
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
I’m pretty sure NO ONE would hand fly a plane on one engine unless the A/P was deferred. Your scenario doesn’t make sense in discussing what is written in the manuals.
Still you take off, blow one flying raw data; they go Back and look at the FDR, what you think they’d say? “Did we train you to fly a take off like that”?
All it takes is one little incident for them to see you messing around in THEIR airplane. Even after turning the autopilot on after losing an engine, they CAN still come back and screw you over something like this.
Do I believe pilots should remain proficient in flying the plane? Heck yeah, but don’t get cocky. At the end of the day your responsible for the people in the back and not your credibility on the Internet. I say this becuase a few monthes back had an FO, total thinks he’s the captain type, find him “practicing his CA flows” sitting in the left seat even before he’s been awarded the CA Spot and still hasn’t, liked to take off the autopilot at 10000 feet to stay proficient and bragged about how he thinks everyone should be able to do a single engine raw data etc and does all his take offs raw data. When i say to him I don’t want him doing that, he argues with me, tells me to show him where it says don’t do it etc.

Last edited by prex8390; 12-20-2017 at 06:55 PM.
prex8390 is offline  
Old 12-20-2017, 07:26 PM
  #17752  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: 757/767
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by prex8390
Still you take off, blow one flying raw data; they go Back and look at the FDR, what you think they’d say? “Did we train you to fly a take off like that”?
All it takes is one little incident for them to see you messing around in THEIR airplane. Even after turning the autopilot on after losing an engine, they CAN still come back and screw you over something like this.
Do I believe pilots should remain proficient in flying the plane? Heck yeah, but don’t get cocky. At the end of the day your responsible for the people in the back and not your credibility on the Internet. I say this becuase a few monthes back had an FO, total thinks he’s the captain type, find him “practicing his CA flows” sitting in the left seat even before he’s been awarded the CA Spot and still hasn’t, liked to take off the autopilot at 10000 feet to stay proficient and bragged about how he thinks everyone should be able to do a single engine raw data etc and does all his take offs raw data. When i say to him I don’t want him doing that, he argues with me, tells me to show him where it says don’t do it etc.
If you are unable to perform a raw data takeoff without dramatically reducing safety margins, please do us all a favor and find another job. This isn't directed at you personally, just to anyone that happens to be reading this. It's too bad they decided to make a knee-jerk policy change due to some people not paying attention departing ATL.

Your FO sounds like a real piece of work, but not because he wanted to use a lower level of automation.
172skychicken is offline  
Old 12-20-2017, 07:42 PM
  #17753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
Are you sure about that page number? 7-19 thru 7-21 is the take off procedures in “block” format. No verbiage about RNAV anywhere.

7-22 talks about RNAV, but nothing has changed from Rev3B that I can find. (CFM 10-2)

7-16 does get rid of the requirement to select HDG or NAV mode at 400’. (Rev3B CFM 10-19) Now to be selected right after speed mode at V2+10, at V2+10-15 KIAS.

FOM 8-12 already requires the FD and LDI for all RNAV SIDs, and recommends use of A/P.
This has nothing to do with RNAV specifically. In rev 4, FD must be on for all takeoffs (Except MEL and w/ LCP). Forget about RNAV in reference to anything I've written.

Originally Posted by msprj2
Practice in the sim. They are always looking for nfp's

Why don't you give your passengers that brief. I Think they would deplane.

Imagine if your Dr told you they weren't going to use the newer, safer, higher tech procedures, but wanted to practice the old way?
Not a valid analogy. It would be analogous if you said that if any one of a laundry list of problems happens to the high tech during the procedure, the Dr. would have to revert to the old way and if he doesn't pull it off you die. And the old way is a perishable skill that can only be maintained by actually doing it regularly.

How about this brief: "your professional Airline Transport Pilots are not capable of doing what 100 hour Private Pilots are ostensibly trained and tested for."

Originally Posted by prex8390
The easiest solution to the argument is, if you blew an engine on take off and decided to hand fly it raw data; What do you think the company would say?
Should be A-OK, they'll still allow it if you find it deferred and it's gonna be your first ever time giving it a whirl.

At the end of the day your responsible for the people in the back
I don't see how anyone can fulfill that responsibility without being proficient and comfortable flying the plane. And I don't see how anyone can be proficient and comfortable flying the airplane without... flying the airplane.
vessbot is offline  
Old 12-20-2017, 08:00 PM
  #17754  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Default

Originally Posted by vessbot
This has nothing to do with RNAV specifically. In rev 4, FD must be on for all takeoffs (Except MEL and w/ LCP). Forget about RNAV in reference to anything I've written.



Not a valid analogy. It would be analogous if you said that if any one of a laundry list of problems happens to the high tech during the procedure, the Dr. would have to revert to the old way and if he doesn't pull it off you die. And the old way is a perishable skill that can only be maintained by actually doing it regularly.

How about this brief: "your professional Airline Transport Pilots are not capable of doing what 100 hour Private Pilots are ostensibly trained and tested for."



Should be A-OK, they'll still allow it if you find it deferred and it's gonna be your first ever time giving it a whirl.



I don't see how anyone can fulfill that responsibility without being proficient and comfortable flying the plane. And I don't see how anyone can be proficient and comfortable flying the airplane without... flying the airplane.
Let me guess next you're going to want to practice V1 cuts to stay proficient.

How about you stay proficient with the manual and do what it says.
msprj2 is offline  
Old 12-20-2017, 08:05 PM
  #17755  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
Grumpy old CA: “That ain’t a flight director, it’s only a flight suggester.”
That's an old salty jingle but it's also true.

Should you strictly follow it when you're a few pixels low on the glideslope and it goes up into a climb like the space shuttle?

How about when it drives you into the localizer until the last second and then whips into max bank in the blink of an eye? And then still takes you into an overshoot?

How about all the regular overcorrecrions in speed mode like when it almost stops the climb when accelerating from 250.

And all those times (especially the first 2, during high workload situations) when I try to compensate and do a better correction/join, I have to ignore the FD for a while and that only adds a big amount to my mental workload as I'm trying to fly the attitude indicator looking through a non-centred FD. Far easier to just turn it off.
vessbot is offline  
Old 12-20-2017, 08:10 PM
  #17756  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by msprj2
How about you stay proficient with the manual and do what it says.
I plan to. It's my philosophy to follow the SOP even when I don't agree with it, unless there's an emergency or some other very extenuating circumstance.

So for the next few legs, I plan to enjoy my last few raw data takeoffs if the CA is OK with them, and which are allowed by the current manual.
vessbot is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 04:27 AM
  #17757  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

You guessed it; mine was 200, his was 900. Looks like the company has recognized the lack of skills across the 900 fleet.

Not sure why this difference exists between the manuals. But as I have said all along, FD has been required for all RNAV SIDs by the FOM. Only now is the 900 being restricted to FD on ALL departures.

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
Which one, 200 or 900?
HighFlight is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 05:09 AM
  #17758  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Both airplanes are.
vessbot is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 12:25 PM
  #17759  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,815
Default

NY base has some benefits I guess



https://www.ny.gov/new-york-state-pa...tion-employees

Max $1.60 per week for up to 50% of your weekly salary during FMLA.

Eventually 100%. Ramps up every year.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Casualinterest is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 01:22 PM
  #17760  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 507
Default

Originally Posted by prex8390
Still you take off, blow one flying raw data; they go Back and look at the FDR, what you think they’d say? “Did we train you to fly a take off like that”?
All it takes is one little incident for them to see you messing around in THEIR airplane. Even after turning the autopilot on after losing an engine, they CAN still come back and screw you over something like this.
Do I believe pilots should remain proficient in flying the plane? Heck yeah, but don’t get cocky. At the end of the day your responsible for the people in the back and not your credibility on the Internet. I say this becuase a few monthes back had an FO, total thinks he’s the captain type, find him “practicing his CA flows” sitting in the left seat even before he’s been awarded the CA Spot and still hasn’t, liked to take off the autopilot at 10000 feet to stay proficient and bragged about how he thinks everyone should be able to do a single engine raw data etc and does all his take offs raw data. When i say to him I don’t want him doing that, he argues with me, tells me to show him where it says don’t do it etc.
Sounds like you’re not too confident in your Abilities in the left seat.
Kforekyle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices