Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
07-29-2017, 07:14 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,100
OK it's a partial seniority order.. but not straight seniority because some may not be qualified, therefor they are skipped and someone junior gets the interview instead.
07-29-2017, 07:21 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,100
I agree.. Without a clear path for career progression, this present arrangement wont be sustainable. It certainly does not give any incentive for loyalty, diligence and other things. Also you are asking people to be brand ambassadors, to think, behave and groom themselves as the staff on the mothership. Yet in the same breath when it comes time to progress, you are telling them, you are not as good as us, we may or may not want you, prove yourself (the gist of DGI).
07-30-2017, 06:40 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,835
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
07-30-2017, 06:45 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,835
I agree.. Without a clear path for career progression, this present arrangement wont be sustainable. It certainly does not give any incentive for loyalty, diligence and other things. Also you are asking people to be brand ambassadors, to think, behave and groom themselves as the staff on the mothership. Yet in the same breath when it comes time to progress, you are telling them, you are not as good as us, we may or may not want you, prove yourself (the gist of DGI).
"First, we agreed that it was in the parties’ mutual interest to move away from the FTI scope issue and flow, as neither side could agree to the other’s proposal. It is likely we will continue to explore the LGA/JFK co-domicile initiative."
I'm curious how it's in "both parties' mutual interest" seems like it's one parties' interest. And how is co-domicile in our interest without something to show for it
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
07-30-2017, 06:56 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 426
Btw, you may remember this from the March Hotline.
"First, we agreed that it was in the parties’ mutual interest to move away from the FTI scope issue and flow, as neither side could agree to the other’s proposal. It is likely we will continue to explore the LGA/JFK co-domicile initiative."
I'm curious how it's in "both parties' mutual interest" seems like it's one parties' interest. And how is co-domicile in our interest without something to show for it
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
"First, we agreed that it was in the parties’ mutual interest to move away from the FTI scope issue and flow, as neither side could agree to the other’s proposal. It is likely we will continue to explore the LGA/JFK co-domicile initiative."
I'm curious how it's in "both parties' mutual interest" seems like it's one parties' interest. And how is co-domicile in our interest without something to show for it
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I also have never witnessed a delta commander do a gate announcement. They are above that kind of thing. But you fools better do it or else your shot at the DGI will be for nothing.
07-30-2017, 08:12 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
07-30-2017, 09:20 AM
New Hire
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Btw, you may remember this from the March Hotline.
"First, we agreed that it was in the parties’ mutual interest to move away from the FTI scope issue and flow, as neither side could agree to the other’s proposal. It is likely we will continue to explore the LGA/JFK co-domicile initiative."
I'm curious how it's in "both parties' mutual interest" seems like it's one parties' interest. And how is co-domicile in our interest without something to show for it
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
"First, we agreed that it was in the parties’ mutual interest to move away from the FTI scope issue and flow, as neither side could agree to the other’s proposal. It is likely we will continue to explore the LGA/JFK co-domicile initiative."
I'm curious how it's in "both parties' mutual interest" seems like it's one parties' interest. And how is co-domicile in our interest without something to show for it
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
07-30-2017, 12:01 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,835
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
07-30-2017, 12:28 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Boeing 737 FO
Posts: 125
Maybe people with cjo's shouldn't be in the negotiations. I know a couple of them that are great guys who want good things for us, but you've got a point. Maybe they subconsciously are less aggressive than that would be otherwise
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
07-30-2017, 01:03 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,147
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
