Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2017, 11:00 AM
  #13901  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Farmlover
Almost 2 years of rsv and never been less than 100. Without picking up
Most reserves get between 85-95 hours, and they work their ass off to get it. The union pay proposal is a wash for them.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 12:10 PM
  #13902  
spin 2
 
stillcantfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: the big one
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by musketeer
It IS Christmas. All of you guys have been under the regional thumb for so long that you seem to be addicted to the abuse. A pay raise based on scales from a decade ago doesn't even keep up with inflation, let alone account for the massive increase in demand for pilots. I say demand massive gains and if the ship sinks, it sinks. There are places to land all around us. Everyone on here acting like we need to accept what the hand feeds us needs to wake up to the current environment.
Thank you couldn't have said it better!
stillcantfly is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 12:12 PM
  #13903  
spin 2
 
stillcantfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: the big one
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Farmlover
Almost 2 years of rsv and never been less than 100. Without picking up
Well that's great for that doesn't happen on my end! Being senior and bidding last out works well!
stillcantfly is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 12:16 PM
  #13904  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CODs4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 536
Default

Any JFK/LGA 900 captains who sit reserve P3 on here.... how often are you getting used? Average flight hours per month? Are you typically able to get released from day-4 or day-5 of P3 or does skeds use you every single day? Thanks.
CODs4ever is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 12:34 PM
  #13905  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
The company wants to divide out the $23K equally over 24 yearly paychecks. The union wants to add $23hr. If you flew the company average hours, that equates to a raise of $2.09 per hour over the company proposal. If you fall short, it's a paycut. I'm not cool with locking in a 5 year contract, that I have to fly over 1100 hrs to make any money, which I could beat with a simple $2.10 hr raise. Take the company proposal, and then lets deal with hourly rates in section 6.
Most people will benefit much more with a pure hourly rate.

Pay proposals (on top of current book) monthly:

Union ($23 per hr)

75 - $1725
80 - $1840
85 - $1955
90 - $2070
95 - $2185
100 - $2300

Company ($23000 salary)

75 - $1916
80 - $1916
85 - $1916
90 - $1916
95 - $1916
100 - $1916

I'm not working for free.
Bartok is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 12:49 PM
  #13906  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

Just looked at my stubs, and I credited 75.5, 80, and 76 the past 3 months, line holder, with no pick-ups. A far cry from your 100 on RSV. Me thinks something smells strong and wrong in Denmark.

Originally Posted by Farmlover
Almost 2 years of rsv and never been less than 100. Without picking up
HighFlight is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 12:53 PM
  #13907  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

Anything less than $25.56 is a pay cut for anyone on property in the past 2 years. And even at $25.56, it's still less pay than the more senior guys got back in the day, right?

I'll vote no for anything less than $25.56. I was hired at 75 hours guarantee, I get paid at 75 hours, and I see anything based on 83 or 85 hours as a pay cut, period.

And don't give me any of that BS about the 401K increased contribution. It might be a good thing. It might not. Won't know until one is taking it out. Had anyone here tried to take money from their 401K in 2007/2008, they would have lost their pants. Many have just started breaking even in the past year or two.

Originally Posted by Bartok
Most people will benefit much more with a pure hourly rate.

Pay proposals (on top of current book) monthly:

Union ($23 per hr)

75 - $1725
80 - $1840
85 - $1955
90 - $2070
95 - $2185
100 - $2300

Company ($23000 salary)

75 - $1916
80 - $1916
85 - $1916
90 - $1916
95 - $1916
100 - $1916

I'm not working for free.
HighFlight is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 01:35 PM
  #13908  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
Anything less than $25.56 is a pay cut for anyone on property in the past 2 years. And even at $25.56, it's still less pay than the more senior guys got back in the day, right?

I'll vote no for anything less than $25.56. I was hired at 75 hours guarantee, I get paid at 75 hours, and I see anything based on 83 or 85 hours as a pay cut, period.

And don't give me any of that BS about the 401K increased contribution. It might be a good thing. It might not. Won't know until one is taking it out. Had anyone here tried to take money from their 401K in 2007/2008, they would have lost their pants. Many have just started breaking even in the past year or two.
It's only a pay cut for those that average less than 83 hours a month.

For those that average more it is a raise.

Don't get me wrong I'll take the more money option, but the problem is we need to get what we can while the fire is hot, I've seen it turn the other way too many times to wait "because we can get more" down the line.

I see a trend that it's the guys that only fly 75 hours that have a problem with this.

For everyone else it's a benefit.
Bartok is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 01:49 PM
  #13909  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
It's only a pay cut for those that average less than 83 hours a month.

For those that average more it is a raise.

Don't get me wrong I'll take the more money option, but the problem is we need to get what we can while the fire is hot, I've seen it turn the other way too many times to wait "because we can get more" down the line.

I see a trend that it's the guys that only fly 75 hours that have a problem with this.

For everyone else it's a benefit.
I have a problem with the word pay-cut in this environment. It's unethical to rob Peter to pay Paul.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 02:04 PM
  #13910  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
I have a problem with the word pay-cut in this environment. It's unethical to rob Peter to pay Paul.
It's not a paycut, it's an actualization of a temporary Retention Bonus.

It's a raise because the bonus will go away.

And it's more money than now for most pilots on property.
Bartok is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 11:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 08:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 07:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 07:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices