Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
03-27-2017, 02:40 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 480
I know there's a five year plan guys, before you start. Either the dual qual isn't as big a money item as the company pretends or we ain't keeping the 200s very long (which was always the plan until metaphorically 5 minutes ago)
03-27-2017, 02:51 PM
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
The rep i talked to went further than that. We want money for dual qual and the company has to spend money to get us trained up, and Delta doesn't expect us to have the 200s long enough that we'd get the return on investment.
I know there's a five year plan guys, before you start. Either the dual qual isn't as big a money item as the company pretends or we ain't keeping the 200s very long (which was always the plan until metaphorically 5 minutes ago)
I know there's a five year plan guys, before you start. Either the dual qual isn't as big a money item as the company pretends or we ain't keeping the 200s very long (which was always the plan until metaphorically 5 minutes ago)
The ultimate reason for this, is Trump is deregulating a lot of the rules that require RJ service in some cities, i.e. slot restrictions, essential service, perimeter rules, etc. Delta has small monopolies on those heavily regulated airports. When this deregulation happens, even the C-series is simply too small to meet demand.
03-27-2017, 03:18 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 536
"487 hrs Company time, 1,278 Total time"
That was as low as it went this time for LGA 900 CA. I'll ask the dumb question...
1278 total time - is that referring to just Part 121 time, because it wouldn't make sense to upgrade to CA with less than 1500 ATP minimums, or am I missing something?
If it's FAR time then they should change the wording as it's confusing.
That was as low as it went this time for LGA 900 CA. I'll ask the dumb question...
1278 total time - is that referring to just Part 121 time, because it wouldn't make sense to upgrade to CA with less than 1500 ATP minimums, or am I missing something?
If it's FAR time then they should change the wording as it's confusing.
03-27-2017, 03:49 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
No, it refers to the 2500 TT waivable requirement. But their percentages are off.
1000 X .487 = 487 CT
2500 X .487 = 1218 TT
2500 X .511 = 1287 TT (what was posted)
What it should actually be, I think, is 1217. Someone made a typo.
1000 X .487 = 487 CT
2500 X .487 = 1218 TT
2500 X .511 = 1287 TT (what was posted)
What it should actually be, I think, is 1217. Someone made a typo.
"487 hrs Company time, 1,278 Total time"
That was as low as it went this time for LGA 900 CA. I'll ask the dumb question...
1278 total time - is that referring to just Part 121 time, because it wouldn't make sense to upgrade to CA with less than 1500 ATP minimums, or am I missing something?
If it's FAR time then they should change the wording as it's confusing.
That was as low as it went this time for LGA 900 CA. I'll ask the dumb question...
1278 total time - is that referring to just Part 121 time, because it wouldn't make sense to upgrade to CA with less than 1500 ATP minimums, or am I missing something?
If it's FAR time then they should change the wording as it's confusing.
Last edited by HighFlight; 03-27-2017 at 04:03 PM.
03-27-2017, 03:59 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Inverted
Posts: 402
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
