Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Pinnacle=Endeavor Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2013, 10:21 PM
  #141  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by SmitteyB
Shy- you offer nothing meaningful to the conversation. You are an idiot if you think that Colgan pilots deserved nothing because someone crashed an airplane.

I would argue after 3701 no Pinnacle Pilot had any career expecations either. No airframes had been added since that accident. Seriously what kind of an argument is that?
Shy's point isn't that good, however some history of your merger partner needs to be corrected:

Pinnacle continued to take deliveries of CRJ200s for over a year after the 3701 accident.

They got the contract to fly CRJ900s about a year and a half after the CRJ200 deliveries were completed.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 05:35 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 246
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy

Sounds eerily like Colgan 3407. And both CA's names were Marvin. What are the chances. Incompetent pilots should be weeded out, instead, ALPA protects them.
Explain how ALPA protected the Captain of the 3407 Accident (kinda tough to do as ALPA was only on property for a handful of weeks prior to the accident)?

ALPA doesn't protect incompetent pilots, it protects pilots from incompetent management who can't follow a process.

Last edited by Seggy; 06-05-2013 at 05:53 AM.
Seggy is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 05:35 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,341
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
That was long before it was Pinnacle. Was that Express I? I assume so. 1991 was a long time ago. How big was Express I back then? What kind of operations was it doing?



Sounds eerily like Colgan 3407. And both CA's names were Marvin. What are the chances. Incompetent pilots should be weeded out, instead, ALPA protects them.
Man, MA, it's always someone else's fault. Number one, a name change doesn't change the fact that the airline has killed passengers in the past - and oh by the way in 1991 it was doing the same operation as it is doing today - flying feeder work for a major. Potentially the only difference being 135 carrier vs 121. Don't know for sure though. Fact is, you went to an airline with an accident history. You are lucky they weren't shut down, otherwise you wouldn't have had a JetU to go to to learn new hire ground school at a slower rate.

And what's this about "protecting pilots"? And not ratting them out? I'm pretty sure you used to brag on airlink about being allowed to do certain things when you were an FO, that most of the rest of us would just look at our FOM and think, well, says I can't do it. I'm totally the pot here, but you are no angel when it comes to doing things that might have needed ALPA protection.
cencal83406 is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 05:46 AM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 787
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Shy's point isn't that good, however some history of your merger partner needs to be corrected:

Pinnacle continued to take deliveries of CRJ200s for over a year after the 3701 accident.

They got the contract to fly CRJ900s about a year and a half after the CRJ200 deliveries were completed.
Thank you for clearing that up. I was completely aware of the EDC-financed 900s, but did not know that -200s kept coming. I stand corrected.
SmitteyB is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 05:54 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 787
Default

Shy- btw Monteleon was a trouble maker at the FAA who was suspended and possibly fired for some of the things he was doing or not doing in his job. I believe some of the things he said, but to give him an open mic would be foolish. Just as most of your arguments go over people's heads because your reputation.

Monteleon isn't as clean as you think.

And B Coates is a liar. It was one pilots word against another. A loser vs. one of the most competent, smartest, best pilots I have ever flown with.
SmitteyB is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 08:00 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Noseeums's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 426
Default

Originally Posted by Seggy
ALPA doesn't protect incompetent pilots, it protects pilots from incompetent management who can't follow a process.
lol rrrrright
Noseeums is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 09:30 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,915
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
Number one, a name change doesn't change the fact that the airline has killed passengers in the past
It kinda does. See www.valujet.com

And what's this about "protecting pilots"? And not ratting them out? I'm pretty sure you used to brag on airlink about being allowed to do certain things when you were an FO, that most of the rest of us would just look at our FOM and think, well, says I can't do it. I'm totally the pot here, but you are no angel when it comes to doing things that might have needed ALPA protection.
What are you talking about? What illegal things do you claim I did and bragged about?
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 09:34 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by Seggy

ALPA doesn't protect incompetent pilots, it protects pilots from incompetent management who can't follow a process.

did you see how many people got their jobs back because of ALPA during the SLI? Some of those guys have ZERO business being in an airplane or just being an employee anywhere.
mooney is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 10:16 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,915
Default

Originally Posted by mooney
did you see how many people got their jobs back because of ALPA during the SLI? Some of those guys have ZERO business being in an airplane or just being an employee anywhere.
+1!!!!!!!!!!!!
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 10:54 AM
  #150  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
+1!!!!!!!!!!!!

First off, it would be interesting to know the details of what mooney stated.

Secondly, seeing your post, I need to remind you of your party foul.

80ktsClamp is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices