Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Fleet tracking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2020, 05:11 PM
  #631  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
Default

Originally Posted by web500sjc
Mesabah is making the assertion that they will reduce the number of 76 seat RJs (in compliance with the LOA) by using the “parked 76 seaters” to replace old 70 seat jets.

I.e we will use the MRJ 900/E175 to replace old ratty MRJ700s/E170s since we can’t use them as 76 seaters. Which is separate from the “make all 76 seaters in to 70 seaters.

Ahh, I see that now, thanks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
WhiskeyDelta is offline  
Old 06-23-2020, 05:26 PM
  #632  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta
Ahh, I see that now, thanks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Another thing to consider, is that the Covid19 crisis has already shrunk DCI permanently, DAL can simply block seats to comply, instead of actually parking jets. It's hard to say how DALPA will handle that, since you are reducing ASMs, and not actual block hours.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 06-23-2020, 05:29 PM
  #633  
On Guard!
 
Meow1215's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Default

Originally Posted by Rayjay
I don’t see how the agreement still applies when Compass is no longer in business?
This is Delta’s interpretation also. In the grand scheme of things, DAL and DALPA would likely negotiate a new LOA before they park 35 and start removing seats from the others when the time comes to deal with it.
Meow1215 is offline  
Old 06-24-2020, 02:18 AM
  #634  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
Default

Originally Posted by Meow1215
This is Delta’s interpretation also. In the grand scheme of things, DAL and DALPA would likely negotiate a new LOA before they park 35 and start removing seats from the others when the time comes to deal with it.

Don’t take this the wrong way, but who at Delta have you talked to has made this determination? It’s probably not a stretch to say no one because DALPA hasn’t even addressed this topic publicly. I ask you to reread the language I posted above. It’s clear cut that the flow-down agreement has to be renewed or they must park the 35 jets. CPZ has “ceased to be available” and given the lack of a new agreement, those jets have to be parked until, like you said, a new LOA is reached or a new DCI carrier takes their place.
WhiskeyDelta is offline  
Old 06-24-2020, 03:59 AM
  #635  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 102
Default

That is the interpretation we heard from our union that Delta would take

Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta
Don’t take this the wrong way, but who at Delta have you talked to has made this determination? It’s probably not a stretch to say no one because DALPA hasn’t even addressed this topic publicly. I ask you to reread the language I posted above. It’s clear cut that the flow-down agreement has to be renewed or they must park the 35 jets. CPZ has “ceased to be available” and given the lack of a new agreement, those jets have to be parked until, like you said, a new LOA is reached or a new DCI carrier takes their place.
Svfr is offline  
Old 06-24-2020, 04:10 AM
  #636  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,378
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Another thing to consider, is that the Covid19 crisis has already shrunk DCI permanently, DAL can simply block seats to comply, instead of actually parking jets. It's hard to say how DALPA will handle that, since you are reducing ASMs, and not actual block hours.
Not to mention, when the DL & WestJet JV gets approved, it's going to reduce the number of RJ's needed. Go back prior to the Delta & Aeromexico JV, look how much RJ flying was done to Mexico, some out of ATL, some LAX, some SLC. Look who does it now, hint, its not a DCI carrier... Same thing is going to happen with Canada.
KSCessnaDriver is offline  
Old 06-24-2020, 05:28 AM
  #637  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 39
Default

Here's an easy solution. We simply bring all of our planes out of storage immediately. That way, SkyWest has to keep all their -900s and -700s parked permanently due to the NWA scope clause. Simple!
quitty123456789 is offline  
Old 06-24-2020, 02:07 PM
  #638  
On Guard!
 
Meow1215's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta
Don’t take this the wrong way, but who at Delta have you talked to has made this determination? It’s probably not a stretch to say no one because DALPA hasn’t even addressed this topic publicly. I ask you to reread the language I posted above. It’s clear cut that the flow-down agreement has to be renewed or they must park the 35 jets. CPZ has “ceased to be available” and given the lack of a new agreement, those jets have to be parked until, like you said, a new LOA is reached or a new DCI carrier takes their place.
Our MEC Chairmen, who got it from sources directly inside in DAL/DALPA. Again, it’s highly unlikely any current DCI partner will accept a flow back. A new agreement will be required to return all the current DCI A/C.
Meow1215 is offline  
Old 06-25-2020, 05:09 AM
  #639  
Treading water
 
jaxthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Last Row Deadheader
Posts: 61
Default

Looks like a few more 900s are coming out of SLN tomorrow.

906XJ and 153PQ to ATL
913XJ to MSP
917XJ to DTW

Good vibes all around
jaxthepilot is offline  
Old 06-25-2020, 07:28 AM
  #640  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Position: ATL FO
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta
Don’t take this the wrong way, but who at Delta have you talked to has made this determination? It’s probably not a stretch to say no one because DALPA hasn’t even addressed this topic publicly. I ask you to reread the language I posted above. It’s clear cut that the flow-down agreement has to be renewed or they must park the 35 jets. CPZ has “ceased to be available” and given the lack of a new agreement, those jets have to be parked until, like you said, a new LOA is reached or a new DCI carrier takes their place.
I find it ironic that the double breasted stiffs who scoff at any regional pilot in the terminal as if they were useless pieces of trash are now the ones who think they're somehow entitled to a job at EDV. There is/will be no flow down, just as there was no flow up. Grasping at straws in a downturn is a bad look for the prestigious widget pilots.
JonGoodsell764 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Albief15
Cargo
16
08-31-2014 05:45 AM
jetBlueRod
Major
80
06-11-2008 07:27 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
0
10-05-2005 06:19 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
0
07-23-2005 01:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices