Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
What needs to be fixed?  What is a win? >

What needs to be fixed? What is a win?

Search

Notices

What needs to be fixed? What is a win?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2016, 04:41 PM
  #31  
Snake
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 242
Default

I wouldn't be surprised to see Local Executive Council resolutions to terminate the test program for virtual bases. Nobody likes uncertainty.
rube is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 08:52 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
The days of watching out for the old guards are not over, and the environment sets the context. And history informs us as to the sort of shenanigans that get pulled (B-scales, The Matrix that existed both at Delta and NW, etc.).

I don't think you would see guys being as naïve as they were in 1996, but desperate people do desperate things. I think there are enough people around that might want to grab a chunk of money on their way out, under the guise of some pension change (probably not a DB, but some weird targeted plan, or some annuity, or even a really oddly-time early-retirement plan). As we get younger, their window closes, but we're not there yet.

I know I'm probably being a bit machiavellian here, but there is a reason we still read the guy: human nature is mostly constant.

I think there will be more of a need to be involved, and get very, very interested in the quality of our representation going forward, not less. One thing I totally agree with BtoA (and others) on is that we'll need to supervise VB and specially TDY) closely.
I think that ship has sailed. Not to mention, there's no way to get a DB again. At least not anything worth very much, and even a crappy one would cost so much IMO just about everyone would rather just have the cash.

Zero interest and a multi bubble economy high on trillions of funny money would be a hilarious time to try and get back into a DB. There's just no way, even if the demographics leaned that way, which they don't. That ship has sailed over the horizon and off the edge of the flat earth it came from. Its not coming back.
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 09:17 PM
  #33  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I think that ship has sailed. Not to mention, there's no way to get a DB again. At least not anything worth very much, and even a crappy one would cost so much IMO just about everyone would rather just have the cash.

Zero interest and a multi bubble economy high on trillions of funny money would be a hilarious time to try and get back into a DB. There's just no way, even if the demographics leaned that way, which they don't. That ship has sailed over the horizon and off the edge of the flat earth it came from. Its not coming back.
Agreed for both of you and Sink. The restoration+ crowd is literally off in la la land.

In my opinion, my no vote last year was justified. The poison pills have been 95% removed and full restoration granted. On the verge of a presidential election of this sort with an awful outcome regardless, I'm ok with this deal.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 10-19-2016, 07:05 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,456
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I think that ship has sailed. Not to mention, there's no way to get a DB again. At least not anything worth very much, and even a crappy one would cost so much IMO just about everyone would rather just have the cash.

Zero interest and a multi bubble economy high on trillions of funny money would be a hilarious time to try and get back into a DB. There's just no way, even if the demographics leaned that way, which they don't. That ship has sailed over the horizon and off the edge of the flat earth it came from. Its not coming back.
This is a shift in all industries, not just airlines that declared bankruptcy. After 23 years of service my father, who was an office type in the consumer products industry, was given the option of capping his pension and participating in the DC. At his seniority he accrued more cash in the next 7 years than he would have gained in retirement benefit. He made the choice to leave aviation and I think it was a good one for him. All the employees were given that choice and now new hires only have a DC. Companies don't want the legacy responsibility to manage huge funds that don't produce returns for the company and are expensive to administer.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 10-19-2016, 08:04 AM
  #35  
Bus driver
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 838
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Agreed for both of you and Sink. The restoration+ crowd is literally off in la la land.

In my opinion, my no vote last year was justified. The poison pills have been 95% removed and full restoration granted. On the verge of a presidential election of this sort with an awful outcome regardless, I'm ok with this deal.
la la land for their concerns, but your concerns are more cogent and valid 80? Can't argue what a nice raise the training world types will get, nothing la la land about those!
Tanker1497 is offline  
Old 10-19-2016, 08:18 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker1497
la la land for their concerns, but your concerns are more cogent and valid 80? Can't argue what a nice raise the training world types will get, nothing la la land about those!
So someone else getting a better deal is not fair because YOU didn't get it? Funny how you vilified those that voted yes on TA 15 as being 'greedy'.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 10-19-2016, 08:45 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
This is a shift in all industries, not just airlines that declared bankruptcy. After 23 years of service my father, who was an office type in the consumer products industry, was given the option of capping his pension and participating in the DC. At his seniority he accrued more cash in the next 7 years than he would have gained in retirement benefit. He made the choice to leave aviation and I think it was a good one for him. All the employees were given that choice and now new hires only have a DC. Companies don't want the legacy responsibility to manage huge funds that don't produce returns for the company and are expensive to administer.
Even municipalities are moving to DC systems. The "20 and out" model is radically unsustainable, particularly when its based off of "best/last years" especially when there are ways to dramatically increase your income for those years. Governments can get away with the abuse longer for obvious reasons, but even then its really hard to tell the masses hey you have to work til you die with inferior health care so we can punch out after 20, often in our 40's and 50's, all expenses paid. It just doesn't work. And the math gets even dumber when an actual company that has to balance its books has to deal with it.

We can get a DB at some point, but if we ever do it will be an insured annuity based one in our names. And it won't ever be a guaranteed chunk of FAE.
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-19-2016, 09:15 AM
  #38  
Quality of Lifer
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: M88A
Posts: 677
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Agreed for both of you and Sink. The restoration+ crowd is literally off in la la land.

In my opinion, my no vote last year was justified. The poison pills have been 95% removed and full restoration granted. On the verge of a presidential election of this sort with an awful outcome regardless, I'm ok with this deal.
full restoration granted? Give me a FB!!!!! Ask for nothing....receive nothing
Turbo1 is offline  
Old 10-19-2016, 09:40 AM
  #39  
Bus driver
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 838
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
So someone else getting a better deal is not fair because YOU didn't get it? Funny how you vilified those that voted yes on TA 15 as being 'greedy'.
Hello James...those of us that vote for work rules and QOL don't get too wrapped up in section 3, like you and yours do. I will benefit better than a lot of Captains if this TA passes, due to my getting paid for about 1,765 hours of pay for 2016. I can buy a nice car for my retro check if this TA passes. If you want to call the raise from TA15 as being greedy, I can't help you much with that. You do know that you and your fellow LCAs, and the SLIs will get a much better deal if the TA passes, by far, than the average line pilot? I wish I was paid for what my seniority would hold when I'm flying 80/hrs a month on the line. Even better for the 717 LCAs to get 777 override pay. What percentage of the pilot list is getting this better deal if the TA passes James? Surely the majority, that work on average 10 to 12 hour days, right?
Tanker1497 is offline  
Old 10-19-2016, 06:10 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
qball's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker1497
la la land for their concerns, but your concerns are more cogent and valid 80? Can't argue what a nice raise the training world types will get, nothing la la land about those!
Does that include guys who get their trip taken by training and then green slip...or stay home and get paid. Good on 'em. If an OE guy gets a big override for doing OE...goodnonnhim too. They don't get enough right now.
qball is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SunSherpa
Military
18
09-24-2011 08:17 AM
Keydet96
Military
16
03-03-2011 05:56 PM
Longbow64
Technical
0
08-31-2009 06:05 AM
museic
Military
15
08-19-2008 05:17 AM
GrayDogg
Major
0
02-24-2005 05:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices