OE/TOE Trip Removal
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,010
I get a sense that the union monitors a lot of stuff, but it's individual pilots who consistently detect contractual violations. It would be nice for all users to have visibility into the IOE/TOE bucket of trips as they flow in and out of open time.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,653
There is a added feature that allows you to track anybtrip from creation to flight in DBMS. In addition the trips would show up in daily trip coverage.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Posts: 1,034
So don't take offense, Mr/Ms TAprocon, but...
This looks like a bit of a sales job. You mention 23.m.4 and then present a really nice looking powerpoint-esque slide, complete with sarcasm (forget already?)...yet you fail to explain HOW this change can be used.
If somebody was new to the company, and had no experience with this OE trip pull game, it might look to them like under the current contract, the company can pull ANY trip on the 25th. With the proposal at hand, they can only pull a very specific type of trip, but they can do that each PCS cycle (i.e. 4x per day). No big deal, right? At least that's what your really swanky chart seems to indicate.
Soooo, should we explain how the PCS cycle can make it more difficult under this TA than under the current contract to catch trips in open time before they're pulled, or should we just let everyone figure it out themselves by reading between your flowcharts and snark?
Don't get me wrong...I think we deserve to know all the facts.
If you present yourself as an unbiased source, make sure you explain how this change affects us. Most of us are smart enough to know that the company doesn't ask for changes to status quo unless it benefits them. This item obviously does WRT the training cycle. Goody goody for them. But it also affects a lot of pilots who are currently able to make a better living off the rules that stand today.
Just saying.
This looks like a bit of a sales job. You mention 23.m.4 and then present a really nice looking powerpoint-esque slide, complete with sarcasm (forget already?)...yet you fail to explain HOW this change can be used.
If somebody was new to the company, and had no experience with this OE trip pull game, it might look to them like under the current contract, the company can pull ANY trip on the 25th. With the proposal at hand, they can only pull a very specific type of trip, but they can do that each PCS cycle (i.e. 4x per day). No big deal, right? At least that's what your really swanky chart seems to indicate.
Soooo, should we explain how the PCS cycle can make it more difficult under this TA than under the current contract to catch trips in open time before they're pulled, or should we just let everyone figure it out themselves by reading between your flowcharts and snark?
Don't get me wrong...I think we deserve to know all the facts.
If you present yourself as an unbiased source, make sure you explain how this change affects us. Most of us are smart enough to know that the company doesn't ask for changes to status quo unless it benefits them. This item obviously does WRT the training cycle. Goody goody for them. But it also affects a lot of pilots who are currently able to make a better living off the rules that stand today.
Just saying.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,111
I disagree. The company would have to tell the union which trips were used for IOE, otherwise it would be very difficult to track especially if it doesn't show in the daily trip coverage that a trip was removed for IOE. The company can pull LCA from reserve and give them an IOE trip. May be a real good deal for junior LCA to bid reserve then get all their trips assigned for IOE as the month progresses(which could technically violate seniority among other reserve pilots).
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,653
I disagree. The company would have to tell the union which trips were used for IOE, otherwise it would be very difficult to track especially if it doesn't show in the daily trip coverage that a trip was removed for IOE. The company can pull LCA from reserve and give them an IOE trip. May be a real good deal for junior LCA to bid reserve then get all their trips assigned for IOE as the month progresses(which could technically violate seniority among other reserve pilots).
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
I disagree. The company would have to tell the union which trips were used for IOE, otherwise it would be very difficult to track especially if it doesn't show in the daily trip coverage that a trip was removed for IOE. The company can pull LCA from reserve and give them an IOE trip. May be a real good deal for junior LCA to bid reserve then get all their trips assigned for IOE as the month progresses(which could technically violate seniority among other reserve pilots).
This is certainly a nominal concession from current book, but it appears its a minor one and WAY better than the original 2015 language.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post