Search

Notices

Back to the table?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2016, 05:44 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,153
Default Back to the table?

Looks like Malone is going to reach out to the NMB and try to get talks started again. Probably our last attempt to save full retro. Now we get to see how much the company wants a deal. Should be interesting.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 06:33 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
whitt767's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 142
Default

Interesting... wonder what the direction is?
whitt767 is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 06:42 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Schwanker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,237
Default

Standby for "industry leading blah blah blah..."

For me, the AIPs are a deal killer and I don't foresee those being pulled. They are all concessionary in nature.
Schwanker is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 07:04 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
Looks like Malone is going to reach out to the NMB and try to get talks started again. Probably our last attempt to save full retro. Now we get to see how much the company wants a deal. Should be interesting.
Malone has to have something tangible to work with, or no amount of reaching out will do. So I'm going to give the MEC the benefit of the doubt that this direction is a sufficient display of good faith on our part, to get the process going again. My understanding is that up to now, this hasn't been the case, but I haven't heard anything about the new direction, which is the way it should be.

Stupid moves eventually have a way of being discovered. But assuming that they're actually finally showing signs of leadership, and making coherent decisions, they do need our backing, and a little room to work quietly. I've noticed that we have a really nasty tendency to talk about areas in which we might be shifting our stance. A lot of it is conjecture, but some of it seems to be leaks of actual negotiating positions. That's insane.

I do feel confident in saying that there probably is a workable deal between the last table positions that meets pilot requirements. I want them to reach it, and I also want them to reach the best possible deal within the range.

So, unless I hear that we've once again taken an unworkable stance, I'm going to commend the MEC on re-engaging, and back them up on this Get Serious stuff. The company shouldn't be emboldened to play hard-ball.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 07:23 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,537
Default

set sail for fail
tunes is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 07:48 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,523
Default

Groveling... not a great strategy. Scared into no retro, fear is rampant. New direction? Lets call it what it is, lower table position.

Last edited by notEnuf; 09-24-2016 at 08:20 AM.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 08:29 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
Looks like Malone is going to reach out to the NMB and try to get talks started again. Probably our last attempt to save full retro. Now we get to see how much the company wants a deal. Should be interesting.
Nice lie.

Southwest got full retro years after they started their negotiations. Full retro for everyone, retired, separated, deceased. Fully including 401K match and Profit Sharing.
404yxl is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 08:32 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 5-9 block, kill removing
Posts: 385
Default

Any chance that this fear of caving is misplaced? Surely JM realizes that the AIP's, coupled with our already lowered pay rates put MEMRAT at considerable risk. Is there a chance he and the NC significantly improve the company's offer? It's just hard for me to think they'd risk a second overwhelming fail.
Raging white is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 08:35 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 73na
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
Nice lie.

Southwest got full retro years after they started their negotiations. Full retro for everyone, retired, separated, deceased. Fully including 401K match and Profit Sharing.
3%/4%/4% is not full retro. Why do you keep throwing that out? They basically got a cost of living bump-not full retro.

Omar
Omar 111 is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 08:43 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by Omar 111
3%/4%/4% is not full retro. Why do you keep throwing that out? They basically got a cost of living bump-not full retro.

Omar
Quit your lies and deceit. Southwest never took paycuts. Delta ALPA isn't even asking for full restoration.

For the record, they got 3%/4% on that 3%/4% on the 4% on the 3%.

I know it hurts since just prior to them getting full retro, you and your buddies were spouting off how no one ever got full retro, and then they got it.

They got full retro. Period.
404yxl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Antney
Career Questions
2
12-16-2015 06:30 AM
Albief15
FedEx
161
10-02-2015 03:11 PM
jknightcfi
Pilot Health
16
12-29-2011 03:19 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-09-2005 09:30 PM
Low Renzo
Major
4
05-27-2005 10:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices