Search

Notices

DAL Class drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2016, 01:01 AM
  #371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: 737B
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by easternguy
I am surprised I haven't heard more about the newsletter a few weeks ago about downsizing narrowbody NYC flying. Displacements coming?

I expect lots of 1st leg deadheads for the NY base in the coming future.... Are we starting to see some of the motivation for virtual basing now???
asacimesp is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 06:21 AM
  #372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
wags3539's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Slinger
Posts: 316
Default

For someone who is most likely missing the big picture, can someone please explain the downside to virtual bases? From the sounds of it, it seems as it would be helpful for commuters, but I'm sure I am missing something. Don't take this the wrong way, I'm not advocating one way or the other, I am just genuinely curious as to what the downside would be.
wags3539 is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 06:25 AM
  #373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by wags3539
For someone who is most likely missing the big picture, can someone please explain the downside to virtual bases? From the sounds of it, it seems as it would be helpful for commuters, but I'm sure I am missing something. Don't take this the wrong way, I'm not advocating one way or the other, I am just genuinely curious as to what the downside would be.
The downside is a potential loss of jobs. As currently structured any job loss would be very minimal and the company protects only 6 million in cost savings. If the program were to be renegotiated to lift all restrictions allowing international VB's with ocean crossings the job loss could be substantial.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 06:29 AM
  #374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,995
Default

Originally Posted by wags3539
For someone who is most likely missing the big picture, can someone please explain the downside to virtual bases? From the sounds of it, it seems as it would be helpful for commuters, but I'm sure I am missing something. Don't take this the wrong way, I'm not advocating one way or the other, I am just genuinely curious as to what the downside would be.
What helps one group often affects another negatively. VB non-participants fear a negative effect on the bid package they will have available to them. Efficiencies gained by the company generally reduce the number of pilots required. Layovers in VB bases could be reduced, so those living there would lose paid overnights at home. Seniority in VBs is a bit of an unknown, and it's possible that bidders would be bidding "in the blind", leaving a known quantity seniority in their base for an unknown in the VB.

Commuters who are granted the VB likely benefit, but commuters who are not could also lose bid package choices, as well as dead heads from which they used to be able to deviate.

Complex, but those are some possible negatives I can think of.
TED74 is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 06:46 AM
  #375  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoonShot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,057
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
What helps one group often affects another negatively. VB non-participants fear a negative effect on the bid package they will have available to them. Efficiencies gained by the company generally reduce the number of pilots required. Layovers in VB bases could be reduced, so those living there would lose paid overnights at home. Seniority in VBs is a bit of an unknown, and it's possible that bidders would be bidding "in the blind", leaving a known quantity seniority in their base for an unknown in the VB.

Commuters who are granted the VB likely benefit, but commuters who are not could also lose bid package choices, as well as dead heads from which they used to be able to deviate.

Complex, but those are some possible negatives I can think of.
Good synopsis. I'd add that those in current bases could see ever changing seniority in their base depending on who bids a VB each month. Some junior line holders could find themselves on reserve if a bunch of junior guys in their seat go to VBs etc...
MoonShot is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 07:04 AM
  #376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
wags3539's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Slinger
Posts: 316
Default

Thanks guys. I guess I've never seen a virtual base, and have no clue how it works. Those points are definitely concerning. I guess it's all hypothetical at this point. I'm assuming, and hoping, that that's the worst case scenario. Hopefully it doesn't play out too bad, and improves the quality of life for a few guys in the process.
wags3539 is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 07:15 AM
  #377  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by wags3539
Thanks guys. I guess I've never seen a virtual base, and have no clue how it works. Those points are definitely concerning. I guess it's all hypothetical at this point. I'm assuming, and hoping, that that's the worst case scenario. Hopefully it doesn't play out too bad, and improves the quality of life for a few guys in the process.
It will only help the senior pilots, who commute who will now get positive space to work instead of nonrevving and hotels on each end of every pairing. Pilots who live in the VB only lose out, since they no longer get a paid DH to where they already are and now lose per diem they were getting effectively doing daytrips from their home.

It will harm every pilot that doesn't participate since they will have no idea how to judge what base, what airplane, will get what flying, in any sort of reasonable fashion.

Right now a pilot could bid off any seat lock into a new category. They will not be able to do that here.
404yxl is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 07:17 AM
  #378  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 56
Default

I'm sorry if this has already been asked...would VB mean sitting reserve at your VB too? That might translate to QOL improvement, right?
Squirt F15 is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 07:19 AM
  #379  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by Squirt F15
I'm sorry if this has already been asked...would VB mean sitting reserve at your VB too? That might translate to QOL improvement, right?
Pilots currently can get DH's to their home, paid, and then per diem to do daytrips out of their home, because it is a 4 day from another base. This would not help them.
404yxl is offline  
Old 11-11-2016, 07:30 AM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirtdiver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 767A
Posts: 791
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
It will only help the senior pilots, who commute who will now get positive space to work instead of nonrevving and hotels on each end of every pairing. Pilots who live in the VB only lose out, since they no longer get a paid DH to where they already are and now lose per diem they were getting effectively doing daytrips from their home.

It will harm every pilot that doesn't participate since they will have no idea how to judge what base, what airplane, will get what flying, in any sort of reasonable fashion
Who knows what's going to happen? Somebody who lives in base might like the trips built from the VB enough to bid them and leave the commuter still commuting, to a smaller category
Dirtdiver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aussiedoodle
United
9
09-10-2021 12:54 PM
MCFlyer
American
6024
02-11-2020 08:21 AM
Pilotfo64
Delta
21
07-08-2015 02:46 PM
Bobofighter
Major
42
11-10-2007 08:46 PM
WaterSkr
Cargo
7
09-24-2007 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices