Search

Notices

DAL Class drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2018, 05:30 PM
  #2531  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Boeing’s last two clean sheet aircraft have both proved remarkable successful and met or exceeded all the promised specs. The 787 was late but is killing the competition now despite being more money.
The original 787s? We must have been looking at two different performance data then. Of course being on time has no importance either. In case you forgot, that is a big part of the reason why we don't have them. (over promise... under deliver)
JamesBond is offline  
Old 12-27-2018, 06:03 PM
  #2532  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,569
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
The original 787s? We must have been looking at two different performance data then. Of course being on time has no importance either. In case you forgot, that is a big part of the reason why we don't have them. (over promise... under deliver)
The aircraft is meeting all the performance specs and selling very well. Airlines can’t seem to get enough of them!
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-27-2018, 06:05 PM
  #2533  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by captkdobbs
The single-pilot cockpit WILL happen eventually, just as the pilotless aircraft. The question is going to be "when?"

I don't think we'll go single-pilot for 15-20 years. It took years after the technology was proven to get rid of the Flight Engineer. The DC-10 didn't really need an engineer at all. How about the early 737s where they were run with an FE.

What will have to happen before this occurs is the flying public will have to accept other automated transportation systems. Driverless cars are in the works, but they aren't normal yet. Driverless busses? This and they'll have to have a good safety record.

More information for you on the subject

https://ethw.org/First-Hand:Evolutio...rt_Flight_Deck
Baradium is offline  
Old 12-27-2018, 07:51 PM
  #2534  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 258
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Nothing in those sources about single pilot 797 ops. Boeing has put out they want cockpit commonality with the 787.
That means boeing is committed to a yoke on the 797. How quaint.
SideSticker is offline  
Old 12-28-2018, 04:47 AM
  #2535  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The aircraft is meeting all the performance specs and selling very well. Airlines can’t seem to get enough of them!
Thanks to the American taxpayer.

But you know the point was that it was late, and overweight in the beginning. Over promised.... under delivered.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 12-28-2018, 09:28 AM
  #2536  
Back on Reserve
 
captkdobbs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: A330 FO
Posts: 711
Default

Originally Posted by captkdobbs
The single-pilot cockpit WILL happen eventually, just as the pilotless aircraft. The question is going to be "when?"

I don't think we'll go single-pilot for 15-20 years. It took years after the technology was proven to get rid of the Flight Engineer. The DC-10 didn't really need an engineer at all. How about the early 737s where they were run with an FE.

What will have to happen before this occurs is the flying public will have to accept other automated transportation systems. Driverless cars are in the works, but they aren't normal yet. Driverless busses? This and they'll have to have a good safety record.
Originally Posted by Baradium
More information for you on the subject

https://ethw.org/First-Hand:Evolutio...rt_Flight_Deck
This is a great article. Thank you for sharing. There are also several references regarding the role ALPA played in this battle in Flying the Line (I and II).

I will, however, still stand by my original premise that the DC-10 and the 737 (from a systems and operational standpoint) didn't need the FE. I agree that it was ALPA (as well as the Teamsters) lobbying HARD to keep the FE (read more jobs) that kept that position as long as it did.

I also believe that it will be lobbying by ALPA, sometimes directly to the flying public, stating that 'Safety of Flight' will be reduced if we go to single pilot (and eventually pilotless) that will keep two pilots in the cockpit. Just like the FE position, we will most likely see a two pilot cockpit even after the single-pilot technology exists and is proven.
captkdobbs is offline  
Old 12-30-2018, 12:42 PM
  #2537  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by SideSticker
That means boeing is committed to a yoke on the 797. How quaint.
Hopefully SWA doesn't order any
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-31-2018, 02:09 AM
  #2538  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 948
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Hopefully SWA doesn't order any


The trick is to not let them be the first to get it!
Hillbilly is offline  
Old 12-31-2018, 05:43 AM
  #2539  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Posts: 1,034
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The aircraft is meeting all the performance specs and selling very well. Im/Ex Bank can't seem to finance enough of them!

FIFY.


Filler.
Vincent Chase is offline  
Old 12-31-2018, 07:36 AM
  #2540  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,569
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Thanks to the American taxpayer.

But you know the point was that it was late, and overweight in the beginning. Over promised.... under delivered.
Not really but it makes good news. Airbus offers competitive financing and is itself heavily subsidized as evidenced by the recent world court ruling that they picked up 22 billion in illegal subsidies. American and UAL are also purchasing large numbers of 787’s. It’s simply a great aircraft with huge customer appeal. Not purchasing the aircraft is I suspect a mistake Delta will in the future wish they had not made. The A330-900 has all the earmarks of the Convair 880, L1011, MD90, MD11 ect.. Some will point to the current engine issue on the RR version as proof the A330 was the right choice however the 787 offers a choice of 3 engines. The only engine you can get on the A330-900 is the RR off the 787 modified for old fashioned bleed air.
We do however seem to have a knack for loving our orphan children!
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aussiedoodle
United
9
09-10-2021 12:54 PM
MCFlyer
American
6024
02-11-2020 08:21 AM
Pilotfo64
Delta
21
07-08-2015 02:46 PM
Bobofighter
Major
42
11-10-2007 08:46 PM
WaterSkr
Cargo
7
09-24-2007 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices