FO Pay
08-07-2016, 07:47 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Well that didn't take long. Just a couple of posts and you revert to derogatory name calling because someone called you out on a false premise used to support your banding idea - that's the sales pitch to which I was referring to answer your question.
FWIW, my initial take on pay banding is that it would cause more stagnation for much of the group. It works for United and American because they have top end fleet growth. We will never get a UPS type banding because we are a narrow body fleet with a couple wide bodies. UPS is almost entirely wide bodies.
Do yourself a favor and act like a professional in his mid-50's like you claim to be. Watching you act like a teen cyberbully on these forums is embarrassing.
FWIW, my initial take on pay banding is that it would cause more stagnation for much of the group. It works for United and American because they have top end fleet growth. We will never get a UPS type banding because we are a narrow body fleet with a couple wide bodies. UPS is almost entirely wide bodies.
Do yourself a favor and act like a professional in his mid-50's like you claim to be. Watching you act like a teen cyberbully on these forums is embarrassing.
08-07-2016, 07:53 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Well that didn't take long. Just a couple of posts and you revert to derogatory name calling because someone called you out on a false premise used to support your banding idea - that's the sales pitch to which I was referring to answer your question.
FWIW, my initial take on pay banding is that it would cause more stagnation for much of the group. It works for United and American because they have top end fleet growth. We will never get a UPS type banding because we are a narrow body fleet with a couple wide bodies. UPS is almost entirely wide bodies.
Do yourself a favor and act like a professional in his mid-50's like you claim to be. Watching you act like a teen cyberbully on these forums is embarrassing.
FWIW, my initial take on pay banding is that it would cause more stagnation for much of the group. It works for United and American because they have top end fleet growth. We will never get a UPS type banding because we are a narrow body fleet with a couple wide bodies. UPS is almost entirely wide bodies.
Do yourself a favor and act like a professional in his mid-50's like you claim to be. Watching you act like a teen cyberbully on these forums is embarrassing.
Cyberbully.
That's funny. You need a safe space to keep from hearing differing opinions?
08-07-2016, 08:04 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
There is going to be so much hiring that you won't even notice it. Now. It would get us on the right path toward longevity pay which would negate the fact that you yourself just acknowledged in our fleet makeup. In 10 years I would agree with you, that we might notice it. but not now. Not until kids in Kindergarten are applying here.. But don't let that get in the way of your agenda.
Cyberbully. That's funny. You need a safe space to keep from hearing differing opinions?
Cyberbully.
That's funny. You need a safe space to keep from hearing differing opinions?If nothing else, you are consistent with YOUR agenda. You want monetary gains NOW, who cares about 10 years down the road when you're gone. That's how I read your response. And that's how almost every one of your positions lines up on these forums. If you are truly making 10%/year gains on your investments, you'll be just fine regardless of the contract outcome. Good luck to you and thanks for flying Delta.
08-07-2016, 09:56 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Nope. I welcome differing opinions. It does make me uncomfortable watching a 56 year old man act like his grandkids though.
If nothing else, you are consistent with YOUR agenda. You want monetary gains NOW, who cares about 10 years down the road when you're gone. That's how I read your response. And that's how almost every one of your positions lines up on these forums. If you are truly making 10%/year gains on your investments, you'll be just fine regardless of the contract outcome. Good luck to you and thanks for flying Delta.
If nothing else, you are consistent with YOUR agenda. You want monetary gains NOW, who cares about 10 years down the road when you're gone. That's how I read your response. And that's how almost every one of your positions lines up on these forums. If you are truly making 10%/year gains on your investments, you'll be just fine regardless of the contract outcome. Good luck to you and thanks for flying Delta.
08-07-2016, 04:45 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
I'll rejoice when WE have a contract that lives up to management's promise of industry leading. Till then, keep in mind I am not the enemy. I had nothing to do with making you or your group "take one for the team" at any time during your career. Ask yourself who was responsible for that.
08-09-2016, 07:18 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
I'm just surprised to hear that FO's get paid. With all the good experience they're getting, especially on the 88, that seems a little ungrateful, almost like stealing. You can't even buy experience this good.
No, I'm not being serious. And I'm grateful for what you do.
No, I'm not being serious. And I'm grateful for what you do.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
