Search

Notices

FO Pay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2016, 07:02 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by LAXative
Why? Don't you want a 2nd year 717 F/O to make $170/hr like a 2nd year UPS F/O does?
Don't ask me. I've been advocating that for years. Bigger HAS to pay more around here.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 07:02 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Yeah? So what? We don't want that here. Hell we don't even want banded pay.


I for one would love pay banding like United has


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tunes is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 07:39 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,995
Default

Just for fun, I ran some numbers...our pay vs UPS for an F/O in the first 10 years of his career - where he's staying as an F/O the whole time. Of course this can't replicate all career paths but I don't think this would be unreasonable. 1,000 hours at each, PS and Retirement not included; UPS rates from above and Delta rates from the 2015 PWA chart.

Delta pilot starts on equipment X and is paid 70.12 no matter what it is...then goes to the 737 for a reasonable mix of pay and seniority in years 2 through 5...then goes to A330 F/O for years 6 through 10.

UPS pilot just rides up the longevity list, maybe retraining along the way and maybe not.

After ten years - UPS pilot's gross is $1.683M and Delta's is $1.398M, a difference of $285k. $174k of that difference happened in the FIRST 5 YEARS alone, for you TVM types.

We've got quite a ways to go to consider ourselves industry-leading.
TED74 is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 08:04 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Just for fun, I ran some numbers...our pay vs UPS for an F/O in the first 10 years of his career - where he's staying as an F/O the whole time. Of course this can't replicate all career paths but I don't think this would be unreasonable. 1,000 hours at each, PS and Retirement not included; UPS rates from above and Delta rates from the 2015 PWA chart.

Delta pilot starts on equipment X and is paid 70.12 no matter what it is...then goes to the 737 for a reasonable mix of pay and seniority in years 2 through 5...then goes to A330 F/O for years 6 through 10.

UPS pilot just rides up the longevity list, maybe retraining along the way and maybe not.

After ten years - UPS pilot's gross is $1.683M and Delta's is $1.398M, a difference of $285k. $174k of that difference happened in the FIRST 5 YEARS alone, for you TVM types.

We've got quite a ways to go to consider ourselves industry-leading.
Now take that $285K and invest it at 10%/year for X years.

I did a study on this right after the merger. The difference in career earnings would be eye watering, and that would be if you upgraded at the first opportunity to the smallest captain seat as soon as possible, and then to the next highest paying seat (basically) as soon as possible. eye.watering.

But we don't want that here.

The math doesn't lie. You young guys are getting screwed by an antiquated system, and it is sold to you by total fear tactics.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 10:38 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Viking busdvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 845
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Yeah? So what? We don't want that here. Hell we don't even want banded pay.
Why don't you want pay banding James?
Viking busdvr is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 10:42 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Viking busdvr
Why don't you want pay banding James?
Pay banding - widebody/narrowbody is a good start. But it is just a start. We are missing a window of opportunity to make these moves now when they will have the smallest impact. My previous posts on this subject were extreme sarcasm.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 10:53 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Now take that $285K and invest it at 10%/year for X years.

I did a study on this right after the merger. The difference in career earnings would be eye watering, and that would be if you upgraded at the first opportunity to the smallest captain seat as soon as possible, and then to the next highest paying seat (basically) as soon as possible. eye.watering.

But we don't want that here.

The math doesn't lie. You young guys are getting screwed by an antiquated system, and it is sold to you by total fear tactics.
10%/year. If you are making those kind of returns consistently, you're in the wrong business. I love reading posts that just casually try and slip in unrealistic/overblown/misleading numbers to try and make a point. Gives me a good chuckle.
trustbutverify is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 11:04 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
10%/year. If you are making those kind of returns consistently, you're in the wrong business. I love reading posts that just casually try and slip in unrealistic/overblown/misleading numbers to try and make a point. Gives me a good chuckle.
It's a good average. Some years have been better, some worse. 7-8% is probably a little more realistic on average, but it's doable. There are guys that do a LOT better than me. But glad you got a chuckle from it. Maybe you should take more interest in your retirement plans.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 11:09 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
It's a good average. Some years have been better, some worse. 7-8% is probably a little more realistic on average, but it's doable. There are guys that do a LOT better than me. But glad you got a chuckle from it. Maybe you should take more interest in your retirement plans.
Yep, maybe so...now back to your sales pitch.
trustbutverify is offline  
Old 08-05-2016, 07:59 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,456
Default

These numbers are very close to the 2004 767-400 numbers. Even if banding wasn't acceptable it shows RESTORATION is.


http://nebula.wsimg.com/051422c348d1...&alloworigin=1
notEnuf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
Schwanker
Delta
306
01-14-2016 11:09 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Raidr17
Military
20
03-26-2014 12:45 PM
marlonmoneda1
Regional
82
02-13-2011 11:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices