Search

Notices

Lanyard Policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2016, 08:11 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ImTumbleweed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by EGTrise
By all means, wear the lanyards! But as some here have pointed out, our management isn't stupid; the reasons for this change aren't entirely clear. Pay attention to this part of the ALPA memo:
"...if you are challenged by your supervisor or someone in your chain of command, do not risk disciplinary action through non-compliance with their directive. Follow their directive and let us know that you were ordered to remove your ALPA-approved lanyard. Be sure to let your supervisor know that you are complying with his order under protest – and be assured that your union will also be protesting..."
Be professional, be smart. Just sayin'.
Good point.

Keep it professional.

Just know that 12,000+ pilots will be saying...

ImTumbleweed is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 08:32 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,907
Default

Originally Posted by zippinbye
Once FAA-approved, I believe the entire FOM contents carry regulatory weight; an extension of FARs, if you will. Please correct me if I'm wrong in that interpretation.

So if I'm on target, a violation of FOM directives, especially a wanton and purposeful violation, could open the door for FAA administrative or enforcement action, .
Yes and no. I think FAA enforcement because of your shoes not being shined, or wearing cowboy boots, our having hair too long, or wearing the wrong-colored lanyard, falls into the category of being preposterous.
It's never happened.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 08:54 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Yes and no. I think FAA enforcement because of your shoes not being shined, or wearing cowboy boots, our having hair too long, or wearing the wrong-colored lanyard, falls into the category of being preposterous.
It's never happened.

This.

FOM's contain regulatory items and company policy.

It is FAA approved due to CFR's contained in them. Company policy such as uniforms, is not under the FAA's purview. They don't care about it.
thefoxsays is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 09:09 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 367
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
This is a very encouraging development.

Somebody in upper management is running scared.

Turns out they may not have the stomach for the "long process" they've been threatening.

Congratulations Team Orange.
They have no experience with unions, it's an unknown for them. Although most of those guys have seen NWA strike, AAL attempt to strike, AAL work actions, UAL work actions, BOB, etc. To them it's like sitting in a dark tunnel and hearing a train coming.
300SMK is offline  
Old 02-11-2016, 09:12 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 367
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Yes and no. I think FAA enforcement because of your shoes not being shined, or wearing cowboy boots, our having hair too long, or wearing the wrong-colored lanyard, falls into the category of being preposterous.
It's never happened.
Part of the FOM it talks about whom the FOM is applicable to and what sections. For example, the grooming standards dictate no goatee. However, a Fed can have a goatee because that regulation is not applicable to them.

The uniform standards have no weight with the FAA. However, if asked by one of our caring CPO's to remove the lanyard, I probably would... Only to be donned for the next trip after union council.
300SMK is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 04:08 AM
  #66  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by 300SMK
Part of the FOM it talks about whom the FOM is applicable to and what sections. For example, the grooming standards dictate no goatee. However, a Fed can have a goatee because that regulation is not applicable to them.

The uniform standards have no weight with the FAA. However, if asked by one of our caring CPO's to remove the lanyard, I probably would... Only to be donned for the next trip after union council.
First off, BRAVO JM and the rest of the New MEC!

Second, if/when you are 'challenged' by a CP about your ALPA badge (lanyard) as the MEC letter said, be respectful BUT be sure you tell him you are removing it UNDER PROTEST, and ASK for his NAME, get out your pen, let him see you are writing down his name, time and location of his challenging YOUR RIGHT to be in a Union and display a Union badge!

Let's start taking hostages, hit them with a lawsuit, see how they like that.
Timbo is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 04:59 AM
  #67  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by ImTumbleweed
Finally!

DALPA shows some stones. LOVE IT!

I agree!

But Mr Rodgers giving the bird is verrrrrry disturbing.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 05:18 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
zippinbye's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: WB/A
Posts: 899
Default

Originally Posted by thefoxsays
This.

FOM's contain regulatory items and company policy.

It is FAA approved due to CFR's contained in them. Company policy such as uniforms, is not under the FAA's purview. They don't care about it.
Thanks guys for clarifying the reach of the FOM concerning uniform items. Glad to hear the lanyard crack-down is simply bovine excrement and not regulatory in nature. That makes it all the easier to display the ALPA lanyards. Thank you John Malone and the rest of your team at the MEC.
zippinbye is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 05:48 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 275
Default

Don't think I've ever seen a management type with a Mustache in compliance with the FOM. It's not allowed to extend beyond the corner of the mouth. They have already set precedents in not following FOM.

I'm due for a new lanyard, mine is 10 years old.
snowdawg is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 06:03 AM
  #70  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Just a thought. If you read the memo carefully, it mentions bringing us in line with the rest of the company. This policy change also applies to IFS, and ACS. It's a company wide change. Is it poor timing, or nefarious shenanigans?
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
PEACH
Union Talk
8
03-30-2010 08:40 AM
RedBaron007
Regional
30
04-04-2007 09:16 AM
RockBottom
Major
42
06-14-2006 10:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices