Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Christopher kern lec44 f/o rep candidate >

Christopher kern lec44 f/o rep candidate

Search

Notices

Christopher kern lec44 f/o rep candidate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2015, 04:39 AM
  #11  
Bye Bye Maddog!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Movin' On UP........
Posts: 560
Default

That would be 2 middle names!
Piklepausepull is offline  
Old 09-22-2015, 04:33 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crewdawg52's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Right Seat 744
Posts: 946
Default

Simple question....... How did he vote on the TA?
crewdawg52 is offline  
Old 09-22-2015, 06:03 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 534
Default

Your name is on my ballot, good sir. All the best to you.
buckleyboy is offline  
Old 09-23-2015, 03:01 PM
  #14  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 757/767
Posts: 14
Default

Voted NO on the TA.
admrl757 is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 06:19 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sounds's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by admrl757
THE REJECTED TA

We are all familiar with the term “fifty plus one” as it pertains to the successful passage of negotiated agreements. My fellow aviators of Council 44, I submit to you that such a metric is a prescription for rejection, and based upon the most recent survey questions reported via social media, I fear the groundwork is being established for another disappointment. You see, I was taught that anything less than 70% (sometimes 80%) is considered a failure. The bar is set too low. Questions from the latest survey, suggesting a minor tweak here or there to change a “no” vote to a “yes” vote tells me that our feedback is not being acknowledged correctly. Let’s raise the bar. If a 65% rejection can send a message imagine what will resonate throughout our Company, the industry and Wall Street if we achieve an even higher rating of approval with a quality TA worthwhile of MEMRAT.
What are the processes involved in changing the 50+1 rule? Is that based on ALPA national policy or based on the RLA?

streaming videos of proceedings and increased use of electronic balloting). I am not sure what progress DALPA has made on this matter, but I intend to research this issue, learn of any impediments and work to overcome them.
I am told that the new chairman is investigating that however it is a legal issue that Dalpa does not have control over.
Sounds is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 03:19 PM
  #16  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 757/767
Posts: 14
Default

I am not specifically referencing any policies ALPA National or RLA. What I am saying is the TA appeared to be aiming for the bare minimum of passage. The quality of the TA, or lack thereof, represents to me a minimalist attempt at getting passage by just scraping by. By stressing pay, pay, pay it almost succeeded. I am seeking a more comprehensive package and higher quality product. I purport that by raising the bar for higher acceptance, the motivation is there to obtain a quality agreement for passage, not garbage.

I understand there may be some legal constraints regarding technology. I intend to look into that further and see what can be done to address those issues and remove the impediments. Technology and legal will have to mesh.
admrl757 is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 06:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by admrl757
I am not specifically referencing any policies ALPA National or RLA. What I am saying is the TA appeared to be aiming for the bare minimum of passage. The quality of the TA, or lack thereof, represents to me a minimalist attempt at getting passage by just scraping by. By stressing pay, pay, pay it almost succeeded. I am seeking a more comprehensive package and higher quality product. I purport that by raising the bar for higher acceptance, the motivation is there to obtain a quality agreement for passage, not garbage.

I understand there may be some legal constraints regarding technology. I intend to look into that further and see what can be done to address those issues and remove the impediments. Technology and legal will have to mesh.
And how do you get management to sign the contract? Go look at Section 28 and see how many signatures are there. How do you do get all those names on the left side of the page to sign the document? This is a serious question. Our contract is already 10% ahead of the competition and management was willing to go to 20%. Exactly how far ahead of your competitors will we have to be before it's not garbage?
Bananie is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 07:29 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ImTumbleweed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
And how do you get management to sign the contract? Go look at Section 28 and see how many signatures are there. How do you do get all those names on the left side of the page to sign the document? This is a serious question. Our contract is already 10% ahead of the competition and management was willing to go to 20%. Exactly how far ahead of your competitors will we have to be before it's not garbage?
Please enlighten us.

What is "Section 28", and of what document are you referencing? And what, exactly is it referencing?

Can you please post the source?

Then we can read it, understand it, and debate it.
ImTumbleweed is offline  
Old 09-24-2015, 07:40 PM
  #19  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,753
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie
And how do you get management to sign the contract? Go look at Section 28 and see how many signatures are there. How do you do get all those names on the left side of the page to sign the document? This is a serious question. Our contract is already 10% ahead of the competition and management was willing to go to 20%. Exactly how far ahead of your competitors will we have to be before it's not garbage?
Show me where in that POS TA we were ever going to be 20% ahead of the competition. Was our Pay rate going to be 20% ahead of AA's? How about RETIREMENT, was that going to be 20% ahead of AA's?
Timbo is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 07:03 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by ImTumbleweed
Please enlighten us.

What is "Section 28", and of what document are you referencing? And what, exactly is it referencing?

Can you please post the source?

Then we can read it, understand it, and debate it.
Section 28 of your contract.
Bananie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
BoredwLife
Hangar Talk
43
08-07-2008 06:12 AM
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
170
07-11-2008 03:43 PM
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
78
03-14-2008 03:45 PM
Albief15
Cargo
126
07-19-2007 05:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices