The Case For Voting Yes - Multiple Parts
#71
They could give the non-pilot employees a five percent raise on December 25, 2015 - Merry Christmas! - and it wouldn't trigger 3 B.4 BECAUSE it's before the raises at UAL and AAL.
Meanwhile, 3 B.5 expires on the New Year, and DAL could rely on bonuses and lump sum payouts while we grind our gears.
Meanwhile, 3 B.5 expires on the New Year, and DAL could rely on bonuses and lump sum payouts while we grind our gears.
#72
I think the company would say that none of those are justifiable reasons to use sick leave. Yes they are reasons not to fly, but maybe not to use sick leave. I think that I could get be removed from a flight with a call to my Chief Pilot but I wouldn't get paid...
....We don't have a good method to get paid for personal time off that is not sick related. Maybe that's an area that needs improvement.
Well you didn't comment on my sprained ankle example, where this TA results in you being in a situation where you have to verify with a doctor every sniffle for a year. That could happen to you with this TA. Easily.
Now with regard to my examples of things hard to verify, my emotional and mental health ARE health issues in my opinion, and a perfectly justifiable reason to use sick leave. I hope you agree that you cannot and should not legally fly if you are not fit for duty. Period. Even if it is not a verifiable "sickness" that is causing you to be unfit.
Now if you have child care issues or something like that, then yes, call your chief pilot and try to arrange a trip drop. Want to go to your son's graduation? Sure, call the chief pilot. None of these are sick leave issues. These are issues that it would be very helpful to have a PPT system for, as the APD system is too limited.
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 709
This is something I was thinking too. What did they give Delta Pilots during all of the concessions? They just took because times were bad. So now that times are good the pilots should be trying to do more taking than giving.
#74
New Hire
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 6
I don't question the importance of the Section 14 of our contract and the changes that the TA proposes. That's why I was asking the questions. UGBSM was gracious enough to give me his view of a potential scenario. I replied with my interpretation of that.
ghilis101
I may not have been clear. I have been sick, I just have not had enough occurrences to trigger or would have triggered a verification. I too hope we are all fortunate enough to not have to do it.
BobZ
I have always believed that if I had some reason not to fly then the company would back me up. If that didn't happen with you, then that is a problem. If things happen as you said, then I would definitely be working that up the chain.
BobZ you said:
"Its only fools like yourself who cloud the issue by advocating a personal standard of 'sick' that has nothing to do with the clear and unambiguous legal obligation of self certifying fitness for duty."
What have I clouded and what are my personal standards that you disagree with? All I said was that I thought the company's position about calling in sick for non illness reasons was not what sick leave was intended for. This is not my personal interpretation. Being sick and being able to sign a dispatch release are two different criteria. I never said they were the same.
ghilis101
I may not have been clear. I have been sick, I just have not had enough occurrences to trigger or would have triggered a verification. I too hope we are all fortunate enough to not have to do it.
BobZ
I have always believed that if I had some reason not to fly then the company would back me up. If that didn't happen with you, then that is a problem. If things happen as you said, then I would definitely be working that up the chain.
BobZ you said:
"Its only fools like yourself who cloud the issue by advocating a personal standard of 'sick' that has nothing to do with the clear and unambiguous legal obligation of self certifying fitness for duty."
What have I clouded and what are my personal standards that you disagree with? All I said was that I thought the company's position about calling in sick for non illness reasons was not what sick leave was intended for. This is not my personal interpretation. Being sick and being able to sign a dispatch release are two different criteria. I never said they were the same.
#75
You also said ...
"it is undesirable and completely unnecessary to explain your personal private problems to a DHS company doctor or your chief pilot"
If I understand correctly, that there is no prescribed "verification Form" that your Dr. fills out with details about your personal private problems but only that he gives a general nature of the illness and a estimated return to work date. Also the TA takes the Chief Pilot out of the process unlike the current contract.
"it is undesirable and completely unnecessary to explain your personal private problems to a DHS company doctor or your chief pilot"
If I understand correctly, that there is no prescribed "verification Form" that your Dr. fills out with details about your personal private problems but only that he gives a general nature of the illness and a estimated return to work date. Also the TA takes the Chief Pilot out of the process unlike the current contract.
Again, you can't go to a medical doctor and have him write on the verification form "upset about his divorce, needs three days off".
Now, if you are upset about it and can't work for a month then maybe you need to see a psychologist or psychiatrist and you can try and get a doctor verification for that.
But c'mon, it is perfectly reasonable to need a little bit of time off during a personal crisis affecting your emotional and mental health that is none of the company's or DHS's business. I guess you have never been in that position. Lucky you. Yes, this requires the company to trust your good judgement, which they have always done in the past... but I guess that just is NOT going to happen anymore. Too bad.
#76
The NC said call in sick if you have sinus or allergy issues that require Benadryl. It used to be 12hrs, no fly, now its 60hrs no fly. That's the stuff in Tylenol PM. If you get a cold in Jan. In MN, MI, NY or UT and normally use the "DM" cough suppressant to try to get some sleep to fly the next day, sorry that's 48hrs no fly instead of 12hrs now. ALPA aeromedical is the source.
How would Sedgwick handle that?
How would Sedgwick handle that?
#77
New Hire
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 6
UGBSM "Again, you can't go to a medical doctor and have him write on the verification form "upset about his divorce, needs three days off".
I am not saying that you should not have the time off. I was suggesting that you are not entitled to sick leave to cover that time off. Where is it acceptable to call in sick because you are upset about a marital problem?
UGBSM "this requires the company to trust your good judgement, which they have always done in the past."
I have no personal experience that says the company is not trusting our good judgement like they have in the past. If others have, I hope they share that with us here so I learn from that and evolve my opinions.
UGBSM "But c'mon, it is perfectly reasonable to need a little bit of time off"
This is the way it has been here at Delta from the time I was hired. I guess the company(not me) feels that the goodwill that existed was being taken advantage of. What have been your personal examples that this has changed?
I am not saying that you should not have the time off. I was suggesting that you are not entitled to sick leave to cover that time off. Where is it acceptable to call in sick because you are upset about a marital problem?
UGBSM "this requires the company to trust your good judgement, which they have always done in the past."
I have no personal experience that says the company is not trusting our good judgement like they have in the past. If others have, I hope they share that with us here so I learn from that and evolve my opinions.
UGBSM "But c'mon, it is perfectly reasonable to need a little bit of time off"
This is the way it has been here at Delta from the time I was hired. I guess the company(not me) feels that the goodwill that existed was being taken advantage of. What have been your personal examples that this has changed?
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
The legal and professional obligation we operate under is the requirement to self report fitness for duty. Period.
What other occupation requires, at the start of every workday, the execution of such an all encompassing....and legally binding declaration?
The same professional judgment and integrity the airline, the pax, and the faa count on our exercising in every other aspect of aircraft operation.....is what every individual exercises in each fitness for duty determination.
We have an allocated number of paid sick leave hours in our pwa. I dont care if a pilot uses every second of that allocation every year if his individual determination was, in every instance, that he was not fit for duty. Its not my place to second guess that individuals call about their personal fitness.
Use none, or use it all......in either case...there is no 'abuse'.
If the cost of that allocation has become onerous....then reduce the allocation. Or offer lower cost alternatives for work absences.
What other occupation requires, at the start of every workday, the execution of such an all encompassing....and legally binding declaration?
The same professional judgment and integrity the airline, the pax, and the faa count on our exercising in every other aspect of aircraft operation.....is what every individual exercises in each fitness for duty determination.
We have an allocated number of paid sick leave hours in our pwa. I dont care if a pilot uses every second of that allocation every year if his individual determination was, in every instance, that he was not fit for duty. Its not my place to second guess that individuals call about their personal fitness.
Use none, or use it all......in either case...there is no 'abuse'.
If the cost of that allocation has become onerous....then reduce the allocation. Or offer lower cost alternatives for work absences.
#79
New Hire
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 6
Again, that's what I stated before you entered this conversation. We don't have a vehicle to reimburse us for personal time off that is not sick related. That should be addressed. Until then, you are either sick or not. It is a clear line. You are not entitled to sick leave if you are not sick. If you are not fit to fly for other reasons, then you should not fly but don't expect to be paid out of sick leave $.
#80
Again, that's what I stated before you entered this conversation. We don't have a vehicle to reimburse us for personal time off that is not sick related. That should be addressed. Until then, you are either sick or not. It is a clear line. You are not entitled to sick leave if you are not sick. If you are not fit to fly for other reasons, then you should not fly but don't expect to be paid out of sick leave $.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post