Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
The Case For Voting Yes - Multiple Parts >

The Case For Voting Yes - Multiple Parts

Search

Notices

The Case For Voting Yes - Multiple Parts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2015, 04:09 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by ghilis101
1 more TA? Not a chance. You vote 2015 TA and there is zero chance Bastian is giving us a 2018 TA on time. Unless its rammed down our throats again. But odds are theyll milk it in 2018 fedex and swa style. This is it. Nothing left in our skeleton of a contract. Ugh is right.
Pure speculation. Like what will happen if this TA is voted down.
ERflyer is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 04:14 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
Man, you're Chairman's Club material! After C2105, maybe you can suggest another section of the contract to concede. Unfrigginbelievable in these times you'd even accept a single concession.
A negotiation is give and take.

In the real world ultimatums and the inability to compromise get you very little. Two sides have to get something to reach a deal or one of the sides has no incentive to negotiate.

20% more than American for some give and take. Reality.
ERflyer is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 04:24 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by ghilis101
1 more TA? Not a chance. You vote 2015 TA and there is zero chance Bastian is giving us a 2018 TA on time. Unless its rammed down our throats again. But odds are theyll milk it in 2018 fedex and swa style. This is it. Nothing left in our skeleton of a contract. Ugh is right.
Wasn't the exact same thing said after contract 2012?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 04:30 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default The Case For Voting Yes - Multiple Parts

Originally Posted by BobZ
Weasel...

You live in some kind of alternate reality. Sure....as an fo today....go ahead and try and get a pd.

As a captain....i had just the case you cite...personal crisis with family....called scheds and informed them i would not be reporting for work.

Answer?.....thats not approved...we dont have staffing. Okay....well you do whatever you want...im not going to be there. next call i got was from cpo.....accusing me of refusing to report for work.

Both crewmembers now sign the release......it is a regulatory and legal requirement we certify all factors and fitness for duty. If a crewmember cannot do so......they are in the world of the faa....sick.

Its only fools like yourself who cloud the issue by advocating a personal standard of 'sick' that has nothing to do with the clear and unambiguous legal obligation of self certifying fitness for duty.


Originally Posted by bluejuice71
Wow, in to name calling now. Real professional.

Does his post not still have merit? Or are you using his use of the word fool to describe someone as a distraction from the real issues at hand?

Bottom line: Is BobZ making a valid point or not?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 05:32 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Default

More LCA OE Myth Busting

For May, not exactly the peak of summer flying yet but the latest month available, FO's had 3,912 green slip/ assignment trips.

The worst case estimated projection for June if 75% of the PBS OE trips were removed would be 302 trips removed.

So, 302 / 3,912 = 7.7% less.

92.3% of green slips would remain. And as summer kicks in I bet the green slips for June would be closer to 5,000 thus leaving 4,700 green slips. Hardly a devastating loss.

And 100% of copilots will make 21.5% more on those green slips as well as regular pay in 2018.

You could be making 8% more on green slips and straight pay right now if the TA is approved.

It's a complete myth that green slips will disappear with this negotiated trade off.
ERflyer is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 05:50 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
More LCA OE Myth Busting

For May, not exactly the peak of summer flying yet but the latest month available, FO's had 3,912 green slip/ assignment trips.

The worst case estimated projection for June if 75% of the PBS OE trips were removed would be 302 trips removed.

So, 302 / 3,912 = 7.7% less.

92.3% of green slips would remain. And as summer kicks in I bet the green slips for June would be closer to 5,000 thus leaving 4,700 green slips. Hardly a devastating loss.

And 100% of copilots will make 21.5% more on those green slips as well as regular pay in 2018.

You could be making 8% more on green slips and straight pay right now if the TA is approved.

It's a complete myth that green slips will disappear with this negotiated trade off.
Do you ever get tired of getting your tail kicked? Anyway, in the NY FO er category every FO is getting at least 2 greenslips a month. The future looks like even more as training is only forcast to increase. So with this TA at 7-10 % loss, we are tallking at least 2 greenslips per pilot per year. Which if you assume 50 trips per year...equates to at least 8% pay cut. There goes your pay raise plus u get all the rest of the $hit that comes with this POS TA at a time of unheard of record profits.
Pilotfo64 is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 05:51 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
More LCA OE Myth Busting

For May, not exactly the peak of summer flying yet but the latest month available, FO's had 3,912 green slip/ assignment trips.

The worst case estimated projection for June if 75% of the PBS OE trips were removed would be 302 trips removed.

So, 302 / 3,912 = 7.7% less.

92.3% of green slips would remain. And as summer kicks in I bet the green slips for June would be closer to 5,000 thus leaving 4,700 green slips. Hardly a devastating loss.

And 100% of copilots will make 21.5% more on those green slips as well as regular pay in 2018.

You could be making 8% more on green slips and straight pay right now if the TA is approved.

It's a complete myth that green slips will disappear with this negotiated trade off.
I am not voting no to protect excessive greenslip flying for FOs. Sorry. I have enough other reasons. If we are going to do that then captains pay increases need to be much more than FOs. Some on here count GS pay as if it were regular compensation. OK, if that is the case, then FO rates are too high relative to CA rates.

bring it on!
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 06:24 PM
  #68  
Sick of whiners
 
KnotSoFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: 767 VEOP
Posts: 507
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotfo64
Do you ever get tired of getting your tail kicked? Anyway, in the NY FO er category every FO is getting at least 2 greenslips a month. The future looks like even more as training is only forcast to increase. So with this TA at 7-10 % loss, we are tallking at least 2 greenslips per pilot per year. Which if you assume 50 trips per year...equates to at least 8% pay cut. There goes your pay raise plus u get all the rest of the $hit that comes with this POS TA at a time of unheard of record profits.

2 greenslips per NYC FO per month? That's like 30X per day. Doubtful. And although training will not decrease much in the coming months, our block hours, esp int'l block hours will decrease. Autumn-Winter block hours are -25% lower than right now. I doubt there will be many displacements for the Winter, so I would be willing to bet that this GS extravaganza will taper down significantly in 8 weeks, leaving your annual GS numbers suspect as well. Or do you have factual numbers to base your assertions on?
KnotSoFast is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 06:55 PM
  #69  
La Familia Delta
 
ghilis101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 2,467
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
I am not voting no to protect excessive greenslip flying for FOs. Sorry. I have enough other reasons. If we are going to do that then captains pay increases need to be much more than FOs. Some on here count GS pay as if it were regular compensation. OK, if that is the case, then FO rates are too high relative to CA rates.

bring it on!
We have more FOs than captains in most categories, even in categories that don't have 3 or 4 pilot augmented crew requirements. Given that CAs generally have more vacation and sick than FOs, how are you not getting the same number of green slips if not more? Where I'm at (nyc717) the CA greenslips faaaar exceed FO greenies
ghilis101 is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 07:14 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ImTumbleweed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
A negotiation is give and take.

In the real world ultimatums and the inability to compromise get you very little. Two sides have to get something to reach a deal or one of the sides has no incentive to negotiate.

20% more than American for some give and take. Reality.
A negotiation is give and take...until one side takes EVERYTHING and gives almost nothing back.

That's when the other side says...



PARK US!

I am totally content working under our current contract for the next 3-5 years.

Please park us with the NMB!
ImTumbleweed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdr7225
Regional
100
04-15-2008 12:38 PM
POPA
Regional
70
08-06-2007 08:38 AM
acepilot100
Hangar Talk
0
02-09-2007 10:10 AM
Jakob
Hangar Talk
4
12-04-2006 10:15 AM
4th Level
Major
1
02-24-2005 05:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices