Canaries in the Coal Mine
07-02-2015, 06:03 PM
#12
The Brown Dot +1
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
I jump seated today on an ATL crewed flt. I promised myself when I was getting on that I would just keep my mouth shut. You know get along to go along.
No need. These guys were spooled. Solid NOs. They were talking about the DN letter like they had dissected it. They were clearly informed on the TA.
Some interesting commentary on how the MEC admin has lost control of the message and how the word was getting out. Some speculation that something underhanded or maybe better stated something under the table was going on. Atlanta guys. Yeah!
I've voted no before. Pretty much everything since C2K. It's good to see some first time NOs out there.
No need. These guys were spooled. Solid NOs. They were talking about the DN letter like they had dissected it. They were clearly informed on the TA.
Some interesting commentary on how the MEC admin has lost control of the message and how the word was getting out. Some speculation that something underhanded or maybe better stated something under the table was going on. Atlanta guys. Yeah!
I've voted no before. Pretty much everything since C2K. It's good to see some first time NOs out there.
07-02-2015, 06:21 PM
#13
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
From RA's weekly address:
"Failure to ratify the agreement will lead to a very different and longer path that will not result in a better deal. Uncertainty will prevail, and that will not be good for anybody."
I think at the highest levels there is genuine concern that this will not pass. Frankly I disagree with Richard on this one because I'd rather have our current work rules then the ones in this new TA.
"Failure to ratify the agreement will lead to a very different and longer path that will not result in a better deal. Uncertainty will prevail, and that will not be good for anybody."
I think at the highest levels there is genuine concern that this will not pass. Frankly I disagree with Richard on this one because I'd rather have our current work rules then the ones in this new TA.
07-02-2015, 06:34 PM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
From RA's weekly address:
"Failure to ratify the agreement will lead to a very different and longer path that will not result in a better deal. Uncertainty will prevail, and that will not be good for anybody."
I think at the highest levels there is genuine concern that this will not pass. Frankly I disagree with Richard on this one because I'd rather have our current work rules then the ones in this new TA.
"Failure to ratify the agreement will lead to a very different and longer path that will not result in a better deal. Uncertainty will prevail, and that will not be good for anybody."
I think at the highest levels there is genuine concern that this will not pass. Frankly I disagree with Richard on this one because I'd rather have our current work rules then the ones in this new TA.
07-02-2015, 06:42 PM
#16
The Brown Dot +1
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
From RA's weekly address:
"Failure to ratify the agreement will lead to a very different and longer path that will not result in a better deal. Uncertainty will prevail, and that will not be good for anybody."
I think at the highest levels there is genuine concern that this will not pass. Frankly I disagree with Richard on this one because I'd rather have our current work rules then the ones in this new TA.
"Failure to ratify the agreement will lead to a very different and longer path that will not result in a better deal. Uncertainty will prevail, and that will not be good for anybody."
I think at the highest levels there is genuine concern that this will not pass. Frankly I disagree with Richard on this one because I'd rather have our current work rules then the ones in this new TA.
Voted NO twice now. Hopefully it got counted twice.
Another quick question. If our voting software vendor is so secure and secret without ALPA intervention, how or why would Richard make that statement? Does he have some spidery sense or is someone telling him the running tallies?
Did I mention I voted NO twice.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
