Details on Delta TA
#9381
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Details on Delta TA
Clamp, I just laid out a whole conversation where Professor/Shiznit lied to us here regarding sick leave. He laid out something as fact, when in reality, it was his thoughts on how the language will be interpreted and/or enforced. That needs to be highlighted. P2P guys who are being paid to post here shouldn't be excused for lying...
Don't you think?
Carl
Don't you think?
Carl
Actually Carl. I gave you something that I asked a direct question about and gave you the answer I got.
And it was Denny's question.
To my knowledge and the person I asked, that is the way it is.
Once again I ask you, will you accept my wager?
My profit sharing. If I'm lying about being shiznit. Against.
You leaving.
You have accused me of being two people. I have asked you to prove it. And I have asked you to wager on my telling the truth.
I have answered you. And everyone as directly and as honestly as I can. My job here is to help people get info. You are becoming a very large speedbump on the road the that goal.
#9382
Clamp, I just laid out a whole conversation where Professor/Shiznit lied to us here regarding sick leave. He laid out something as fact, when in reality, it was his thoughts on how the language will be interpreted and/or enforced. That needs to be highlighted. P2P guys who are being paid to post here shouldn't be excused for lying...
Don't you think?
Carl
Don't you think?
Carl
And Professor, cut with the BS.... some of it absolutely is your/the MEC's interpretation of the language. The language isn't black and white, and you calling it fact doesn't make it so when it is an interpretation.
#9383
I see a strategy emerging. The union guys are baiting you into petty, silly arguments so the pages get filled up with garbage. If you fall for it people WILL lose interest. We need to keep them reading so they can get the negatives somewhere. We "NO" they won't get any negatives from the union!
#9384
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
80.
It's just not.
When I person asks me a question I go back and ask the people that wrote the language and have been living with it.
That is the truth. And I am answering question as a conduit. I am not judging the TA or its language only helping to interpret. Seriously.
You should see how I vote. But that isn't the point.
It's just not.
When I person asks me a question I go back and ask the people that wrote the language and have been living with it.
That is the truth. And I am answering question as a conduit. I am not judging the TA or its language only helping to interpret. Seriously.
You should see how I vote. But that isn't the point.
#9385
Once again I ask you, will you accept my wager?
My profit sharing. If I'm lying about being shiznit. Against.
You leaving.
You have accused me of being two people. I have asked you to prove it. And I have asked you to wager on my telling the truth.
I have answered you. And everyone as directly and as honestly as I can. My job here is to help people get info. You are becoming a very large speedbump on the road the that goal.
My profit sharing. If I'm lying about being shiznit. Against.
You leaving.
You have accused me of being two people. I have asked you to prove it. And I have asked you to wager on my telling the truth.
I have answered you. And everyone as directly and as honestly as I can. My job here is to help people get info. You are becoming a very large speedbump on the road the that goal.
Carl
#9386
80.
It's just not.
When I person asks me a question I go back and ask the people that wrote the language and have been living with it.
That is the truth. And I am answering question as a conduit. I am not judging the TA or its language only helping to interpret. Seriously.
You should see how I vote. But that isn't the point.
It's just not.
When I person asks me a question I go back and ask the people that wrote the language and have been living with it.
That is the truth. And I am answering question as a conduit. I am not judging the TA or its language only helping to interpret. Seriously.
You should see how I vote. But that isn't the point.
#9387
Denny,
Tried to turn this around as soon as I saw it.
So, first off there is not now nor is there any release of you medical records. Ever. That release is so that the doctor can communicate with DHS.
Thats not how I read it. "Medical Information" says to me anything the DHS requires relating to my sick absence. THAT opens up a whole can of worms in my estimation. Here is the language:
A medical release will be limited to a written authorization for release of medical 16 information (release), provided the release is limited toto the DHS for: 1a. the specific sickness for which the pilot claimed sick leave, and 2b. the day(s) on which the pilot claimed sick leave and the consecutive day(s) off immediately preceding and succeeding the day(s) on which a pilot claimed sick leave.
This information can be required if verification has been required OR sought.
So, for example let us say that you pulled your back out on tuesday.
You have a trip on Thursday.
You are hitting day 15 on Thursday to call in sick.
Your doctor sends a verification to DHS that says, "back pain".
DHS asks for more information, specifics.
Preceding days come into play because you went to see your doctor on Tuesday. Your sick count starts Thursday.
DHS gets another note from your doctor that says,"Denny came to me for a back strain, I prescribed him pills that prohibit him for flying for a few days, expected return on Saturday."
That is the extent of the verification.
And that return date is not a binding date. Its just an idea of your return to work only.
Hope that helps.
Tried to turn this around as soon as I saw it.
So, first off there is not now nor is there any release of you medical records. Ever. That release is so that the doctor can communicate with DHS.
Thats not how I read it. "Medical Information" says to me anything the DHS requires relating to my sick absence. THAT opens up a whole can of worms in my estimation. Here is the language:
A medical release will be limited to a written authorization for release of medical 16 information (release), provided the release is limited toto the DHS for: 1a. the specific sickness for which the pilot claimed sick leave, and 2b. the day(s) on which the pilot claimed sick leave and the consecutive day(s) off immediately preceding and succeeding the day(s) on which a pilot claimed sick leave.
This information can be required if verification has been required OR sought.
So, for example let us say that you pulled your back out on tuesday.
You have a trip on Thursday.
You are hitting day 15 on Thursday to call in sick.
Your doctor sends a verification to DHS that says, "back pain".
DHS asks for more information, specifics.
Preceding days come into play because you went to see your doctor on Tuesday. Your sick count starts Thursday.
DHS gets another note from your doctor that says,"Denny came to me for a back strain, I prescribed him pills that prohibit him for flying for a few days, expected return on Saturday."
That is the extent of the verification.
And that return date is not a binding date. Its just an idea of your return to work only.
Hope that helps.
Thanks for your reply.
Denny
#9388
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
That's fair. I think. But that was a direct answer to someone on HOW this thing will be done.
Please. Someone else ask someone else. If different info is floating around from contract people I would like to know.
#9389
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
your 'job' here?
that implies there is the exchange of labor for compensation.
Since the use of legal names here is not required to participate....how about everyone on this board just begin every post with a disclaimer?
How does this sound......"I am/am NOT a paid spokesperson being compensated to achieve successful ratification of the TA"?
that implies there is the exchange of labor for compensation.
Since the use of legal names here is not required to participate....how about everyone on this board just begin every post with a disclaimer?
How does this sound......"I am/am NOT a paid spokesperson being compensated to achieve successful ratification of the TA"?
#9390
"There will be no sales job."
And then the NC concludes every NN urging you to vote yes. Absolutely unacceptable behavior.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post