Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2015, 10:37 AM
  #8031  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
For everyone asking about quarterly results and PTIX and profit sharing, this is the deal....

I feel as though there is a fundamental misunderstanding about pay and profit sharing. I'm not here to argue for or against nor am I going to tell you how pay raises are going to be funded.

But the reality is that Q earnings are completely irrelevant. First off, we are still under the old profit sharing scheme for this year. 2016 is when the change would be in effect.

If you reference the bar graph of 6 billion PTIX 2018 salary+profit sharing, with and without a deal (I posted earlier); this is the worst case scenario. We will be making more money with this deal across the board no matter what.

Anything above $6BN we will start making significantly more.

I think making the pay / p/s argument is a poor one. This deal gives all of us more money, regardless.

The questions to ask are:

1. Is in enough money?
2. Is it enough money in light of what you view as concessions in other areas?

I think that is a more honest debate to have.
You also have to account for the loss of wide body jobs(and its trickle down) associated with the joint venture changes. There is more to the contract than straight pay.
capncrunch is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:39 AM
  #8032  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
You also have to account for the loss of wide body jobs(and its trickle down) associated with the joint venture changes. There is more to the contract than straight pay.
I'll address the JV language again here shortly with answers to some of my own concerns that were asked and answered.

This was bar none my biggest worry in the contract and its a 'meh', fine change for me now.

FYI Delta wide body capacity is to grow 9% via deliveries in the life of this contract.

I'll be back with more info on JV language. But please keep writing questions down, the road shows will be sporty for the NC committee, as they should be.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:40 AM
  #8033  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by Raging white
Do I get this right, you're willing to sell the FO's quality of life for a raise? Not sure the FO's will support your "I got mine" position, but I respect your honesty.
Are these the same FOs that have been whining for the last 10 years about being FOs? The same ones that can now hold lines in the left seat but are printing so much money that all of a sudden throwing gear is not such a bad thing? THOSE FOs? I got mine? Hardly.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:48 AM
  #8034  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Parking the entire 747 fleet in 18 months will affect him, I hope you asked him when he was going to A330 school...

That's the question for you Timbo, because those Ninjas win again. They are gonna take YOUR seat.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:49 AM
  #8035  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,456
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
For everyone asking about quarterly results and PTIX and profit sharing, this is the deal....

I feel as though there is a fundamental misunderstanding about pay and profit sharing. I'm not here to argue for or against nor am I going to tell you how pay raises are going to be funded.

But the reality is that Q earnings are completely irrelevant. First off, we are still under the old profit sharing scheme for this year. 2016 is when the change would be in effect.

If you reference the bar graph of 6 billion PTIX 2018 salary+profit sharing, with and without a deal (I posted earlier); this is the worst case scenario. We will be making more money with this deal across the board no matter what.

Anything above $6BN we will start making significantly more.

I think making the pay / p/s argument is a poor one. This deal gives all of us more money, regardless.

The questions to ask are:

1. Is in enough money?
2. Is it enough money in light of what you view as concessions in other areas?

I think that is a more honest debate to have.
I respectfully disagree. The misunderstanding is greater. PS ties us to all of Delta's revenue. The pay rates are for your personal hours flown or credited. We make money in a variety of ways, actually flying airplanes is only one. This is about global investment and getting something for outsourced flying.

For example:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/delta-...201412909.html
notEnuf is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:50 AM
  #8036  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
As of July we have 441 positions paying top of scale. The eventual $330/hr, if we gain 350s as we retire 747s, only 3.5% of the list will get those rates at any given time. Sorry to say but you won't see that. And if and when you do you should already have a nice 401k or other plan that was established from all your Narrowbody flying. I'll never see it and I plan to retire at 60.
At least SOMEBODY is paying attention.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:51 AM
  #8037  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
FYI Delta wide body capacity is to grow 9% via deliveries in the life of this contract.
Looking at our WB deliveries as a way to blow off a major concession to our joint venture language is a bad idea. Think about the growth if we don't change the language and the company gets into compliance. Much better than 9% growth.
capncrunch is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:51 AM
  #8038  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I respectfully disagree. The PS ties us to all of Delta's revenue. The pay rates are for your personal hours flown or credited. We make money in a variety of ways, actually flying airplanes is only one. This is about global investment and getting something for outsourced flying.

For example:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/delta-...201412909.html
This is why we still have profit sharing. I do not disagree with your logic. Ancillary revenue streams are a key strategy of the company.

Profit sharing has changed in this TA yes. But only changed. You will still make more money under this TA every single year it is effect, regardless of Delta profit and declared PTIX.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:52 AM
  #8039  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
Looking at our WB deliveries as a way to blow off a major concession to our joint venture language is a bad idea. Think about the growth if we don't change the language and the company gets into compliance. Much better than 9% growth.
Let me get you facts and data and you guys can debate it.

Give me a little time and I'll be back with it.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-12-2015, 10:52 AM
  #8040  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
Are these the same FOs that have been whining for the last 10 years about being FOs? The same ones that can now hold lines in the left seat but are printing so much money that all of a sudden throwing gear is not such a bad thing? THOSE FOs? I got mine? Hardly.
And there you have it.

That's how management and ALPA will win this thing.
Divide, segment and get the 51%.

I'm not picking on tsquarebender. He's not alone.
There are captains who absolutely hate seeing their FOs get green slip #4. Drives 'em nuts.
And they especially hate seeing them get a green slip after a line check trip drop which puts them at triple pay.
Check Essential is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices