Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2015, 12:29 AM
  #7011  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by Airbusdude14
That's exactly what I say they will slowly bring in smaller planes at low rates slowly phase out the Mad Dog. As it is they have tech issues on some of them doing upgrades for future ATC and NAV issues. Will have to retire them. Many pilots will be stuck filying the smaller planes at the very low rates. Can't anyone see the trend. We need our own scope to protect use on how many smaller jets we get before the Co. Needs to adjust the rates.
Not only that, but they will hurry and order 50 190's so they can add 25 more large RJ's at DCI. Then when they park 50 M-88's, DCI still has all the large RJ's.

Add in the EASK to block hour change and we see Delta pilot jobs being pushed to the smaller low paying airframes while every other JV partner adds more international JV flying which will be allowed if we go to a block hour measurement. We may all be Delta Captains for 20 years here, but 17 of those will be in small narrowbody airframes parked next to AF and Virgin 777's and 380's.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 01:19 AM
  #7012  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dtfl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Work
Posts: 507
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
One thing that WAS interesting is the virtual base thingy. Especially in MCO. With the recent announcement of MCO-GRU and SEA-MCO, it does make one wonder what's up with that.
Build virtual bases where they can eliminate DH pay and not staff it like a real base...nor would they pay folks to move?
dtfl is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 01:50 AM
  #7013  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
One thing that WAS interesting is the virtual base thingy. Especially in MCO. With the recent announcement of MCO-GRU and SEA-MCO, it does make one wonder what's up with that.

Yes, but the language doesn't allow for a first leg ocean crossing. So mco gru is out.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 02:03 AM
  #7014  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by WidgetDriver
EXACTLY. My concern is the E195 will become the new B scale. What prevents them from using it to do most domestic flying under those pathetic rates. The E195 can do most of the domestic flying.
From what I understand the E190 is for the west coast to replace the 717s and maybe do dtw flying. Maybe replace the 717 there too. The 717s will come back east maybe to do the shuttle flying in full or replace some 88 flying. The E190 is supposedly not for ATL.

The 88s retirement is now a topic of management discussion. You could probably replace its flying with a mix of 90s, 320s, 319s, 717s, 737s and even double CRJ900s.

That's what I was told.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 02:11 AM
  #7015  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
From what I understand the E190 is for the west coast to replace the 717s and maybe do dtw flying. Maybe replace the 717 there too. The 717s will come back east maybe to do the shuttle flying in full or replace some 88 flying. The E190 is supposedly not for ATL.

The 88s retirement is now a topic of management discussion. You could probably replace its flying with a mix of 90s, 320s, 319s, 717s, 737s and even double CRJ900s.

That's what I was told.

I don't know anything but even talking about 195's as replacement aircraft is kind of silly. This management team is smarter than to eject 50-60 seats that are current filled to the brim on most routes.

Down gauging the 88's would be colossally stupid. I doubt that is a long range plan. The 319/20 is a legit replacement.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 02:44 AM
  #7016  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

This TA is a complete fail. We got a nickel of per diem and 15 minutes of vacation. Management got everything they wanted and more.

The insiders delivered us once again on the exact minute management wanted the deal done. This is the worst piece of negotiating in ALPA history. And history will reflect that.
gzsg is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 02:53 AM
  #7017  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
Yes, but the language doesn't allow for a first leg ocean crossing. So mco gru is out.
MCO-GRU would not be an ocean crossing. Hell, NRT-SIN isn't an ocean crossing.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 02:54 AM
  #7018  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by Professor
I don't know anything but even talking about 195's as replacement aircraft is kind of silly. This management team is smarter than to eject 50-60 seats that are current filled to the brim on most routes.

Down gauging the 88's would be colossally stupid. I doubt that is a long range plan. The 319/20 is a legit replacement.

That is ALL conjecture.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 02:55 AM
  #7019  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
This TA is a complete fail. We got a nickel of per diem and 15 minutes of vacation. Management got everything they wanted and more.

The insiders delivered us once again on the exact minute management wanted the deal done. This is the worst piece of negotiating in ALPA history. And history will reflect that.
GZSG,

Missed you buddy.

I think that is your opinion. And as your opinion is valid.

The reality is that at least in pay this TA does a few things:
  • DOS puts us at or above AA rates.
  • Amendable date puts all rates above C2K rates. Well above AA.
  • Pays out more to pilots regardless of where company profits land. There is still no cap in profit sharing.
  • if ratified, the TA will have raised our rates 81.8% since 2008

Those are just facts. You may not like them. Just putting them out there for you and others.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:08 AM
  #7020  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
The insiders delivered us once again on the exact minute management wanted the deal done.
So what? Why don't you tell us exactly how long we should have "held out" or stalled the process. Time means bupkus.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices