Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2015, 11:33 AM
  #6701  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
assuming the rumors on the JV section are not correct. .
uh, it's all in the TA. Scope concessions for the JV are large RJs are confirmed.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:34 AM
  #6702  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD CA
Posts: 705
Default

I'm just curious what everyone thinks the fair market value of a pilot is compensation wise? How much realistically should pilots make while taking into account not putting the company eventually in financial pain if there is an economic downturn?



$350 an Hour for 767- y2016

$400 an Hour for 777-y2016

that is what I think the pay rates should be.

And 6 weeks of Vacation after 25 years
Commando is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:34 AM
  #6703  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by WARich
I'm just curious what everyone thinks the fair market value of a pilot is compensation wise? How much realistically should pilots make while taking into account not putting the company eventually in financial pain if there is an economic downturn?
Good question in a way. Depends on who you ask. A pilot will say his value is higher than he is being compensated for, regardless. A manager will say the market value is what he is already paying. Neither get what they think a pilot is worth. The manager pays more, the pilot gets less.

A better way of looking at it may be to say what does market itself dictate and what does that typically look like. Historically we have been able to pattern bargain, where we match and receive a margin above the industry standard. In most cases that's the industry leader. That margin has been usually in the single digits, say 1-5%. This seems reasonable when you look at from the manager's perspective. He has to compete in the market for profits and shareholder value. He doesn't want to distance himself from the industry standard cost structure for fear of becoming uncompetitive.

I want much more at all times. That is natural. What is possible is another thing altogether.

Take for instance this TA. If nothing happens and this airline remains on the current trajectory, our pay will exceed AA by nearly 15%. That is a good margin for RA to eat. But, he has some hedging. If we remain this profitable, there will be plenty of profits to endure a period of relative uncompetitiveness until other airlines pattern bargain on our rates. If we lose a degree of profitability, that margin shrinks to 3.5% (when we have no profits). In this way his labor costs don't run away when he can least afford it. Smart thinking.

My preference would have been to sell another 5% PS and make that margin at 0 profitability 8.5%. That may be too rich for RA's blood.

Last edited by SharpestTool; 06-09-2015 at 11:46 AM.
SharpestTool is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:37 AM
  #6704  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Before we lock-in 50% block hours, here's some actual DALPA Data on the JV for comparison:




Cheers
George
georgetg is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:38 AM
  #6705  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
uh, it's all in the TA. Scope concessions for the JV are large RJs are confirmed.
?, no idea what this means.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:40 AM
  #6706  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Sure. That assumes this is a one-way negotiation. In my world I realize that we are negotiating, not demanding. The company has there wants and demands just like we do. There going to get some of their requirements met, we're going to get ours. 2 way street.
But in coming up with a dollar value of the TA and applying that to the pay rates only would, by definition, take 100% of the company's financial concerns into account. They were all part of the up and down costing of every section. We'd be effectively paying to undo the concessions with full value reductions from the pay rates. Why on earth would they object to that? Its the ultimate "cost neutral" approach. It wouldn't cost a penny more than the current TA.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:41 AM
  #6707  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I don't see this as a big backfire. After talking with several reps it may be it does not pass tomorrow. It's not the end of the world to send the NC back to the company. On the other hand substantial improvements are not likely. 2 to 3 % more in pay would probably cement a pass assuming the rumors on the JV section are not correct. My discussions say the JV section is fine and there will be more explanation to follow.
OK sailing, I'm going to assume 2 to 3% will swing you. Before you get carried away, crank out the TVM to see when you have to get that before its eaten up by time. If you exceed that time, you lose. Then you either have to inflate your minimum or eat the loss.

I provided such an analysis last time. For free! If I'm asked nicely I will do it again because I love all you guys. I will show you what happens at 3,6,12,18, and 24 months. After 24 months it becomes comedy. Go ask SWAPA about that.
SharpestTool is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:41 AM
  #6708  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cogf16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Posts: 978
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Yup.

Great stuff huh?

YGTBSM.
YGBFSMM, SUBTRACTED a useless little word and added 2 good ones Last one is man, you can figure the other one!
Cogf16 is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:41 AM
  #6709  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
This is good as it gets for you boys and girls. Just like last time. Whipped yourselves into a frenzy. But, wouldn't you know it, the reps and the MEC released the supporting material, then the road shows. The majority saw the sense and the value. Then you were all relegated to where you belong, the short bus.

Enjoy it while it lasts!
Ah. Well trolled. Well trolled indeed.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:44 AM
  #6710  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sounds's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Have you looked at the Facebook comments. I would argue it's a larger sample size and it running overwhelming no..........
Is this your first online community? Have you encontered the term vocal minority? The small group of individuals that frequently and strongly voice their opinions, constrasting with the silent majority that makes up most of the population base, but rarely give their opinions.
Sounds is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices