Details on Delta TA
#6482
The problem they're having with the huge OE/GS bonanza is a direct result of the 3 yr hiring freeze. Not our problem to solve. A tiny bit of the next $6B sitting around waiting for a stock buyback would give them some options.
#6483
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
#6485
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
I Know they aren't supposed to vote till tomm, is that still gonna be true?
What is the mood of the reps? Outraged, passive, etc?
Just trying to gauge if this turd will float...
Are they having an open honest debate? And who is grilling the negotiators/MEC over this?
Thx.
What is the mood of the reps? Outraged, passive, etc?
Just trying to gauge if this turd will float...
Are they having an open honest debate? And who is grilling the negotiators/MEC over this?
Thx.
#6486
#6487
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
How is that spin? I don't like the new verification, but currently we get nothing for our unused sick time. I've had 80 hours of unused time every year but 1.
I'm just passing along what's being briefed at the meeting. You can decide if you like it or not. This piece for me is a positive. YMMV
I'm just passing along what's being briefed at the meeting. You can decide if you like it or not. This piece for me is a positive. YMMV
#6488
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,169
I Know they aren't supposed to vote till tomm, is that still gonna be true?
What is the mood of the reps? Outraged, passive, etc?
Just trying to gauge if this turd will float...
Are they having an open honest debate? And who is grilling the negotiators/MEC over this?
Thx.
What is the mood of the reps? Outraged, passive, etc?
Just trying to gauge if this turd will float...
Are they having an open honest debate? And who is grilling the negotiators/MEC over this?
Thx.
Any comment on mood would be speculation as none of the reps have spoken yet. From the peanut gallery I have no sense of where they are leaning.
#6489
Payrates:
21.5% compounded over 3 years
3.5% margin + PS on AA rates
45.4% compounded over 6 years counting C2012
Satisfied with this section
DC fund goes to 16% 1/17
Would rather have seen the extra 1% in fixed pay rates. Not a deal killer.
Per diem increase, vacation pay, CQ pay, etc
Yawn. Money could be utilized anywhere within the contract.
Company commits to 100 seat jet
More RJ reductions via 2:1 gearing. 2 100 seaters allow 1 additional 70 or 76 seat jet. DCI shrinks to 425 from 450. Total seats also decline by 2%. DCI block hour ratio enhanced from 1.35 to 1.81.
Nothing to hate here. More transferal of flying from DCI to mainline. Jobs=airframes. This mechanism works great for C2012 and continues.
Joint Venture Scope
Needs more study
Reroute improvements
No issues.
Sick Leave
No issues. I can verify beyond 80 hours instead of 100. Need some clarification whether process remains the same, i.e. pre-emptive verification if pilot desires, etc.
The rest is fluff and stuff.
Impression:
Solid industry leading contract. I would have preferred more monetization of profit sharing into fixed rates. But, if this board is any indication, the pilot group likely wants to carry the risk associated with PS.
RA wants us to lead the industry in pay rates. He also knows the PS is an expense, contrary to what I read here. It is profit that could go to capital expenditures or to shareholders. If he is on the hook to pay us, it's an expense. We clearly wanted to retain PS and I bet he wants to keep it in place as well in order to provide motivation. He is going to count PS as part of total compensation, as he should. Adding our profit sharing to the 3.5% margin on AA, we will be well ahead of AA in good years and firmly ahead on breakeven or worse years.
RJ flying transfer to mainline continues.
I'll vote for it if it makes it through the MEC
Ratified 60%
21.5% compounded over 3 years
3.5% margin + PS on AA rates
45.4% compounded over 6 years counting C2012
Satisfied with this section
DC fund goes to 16% 1/17
Would rather have seen the extra 1% in fixed pay rates. Not a deal killer.
Per diem increase, vacation pay, CQ pay, etc
Yawn. Money could be utilized anywhere within the contract.
Company commits to 100 seat jet
More RJ reductions via 2:1 gearing. 2 100 seaters allow 1 additional 70 or 76 seat jet. DCI shrinks to 425 from 450. Total seats also decline by 2%. DCI block hour ratio enhanced from 1.35 to 1.81.
Nothing to hate here. More transferal of flying from DCI to mainline. Jobs=airframes. This mechanism works great for C2012 and continues.
Joint Venture Scope
Needs more study
Reroute improvements
No issues.
Sick Leave
No issues. I can verify beyond 80 hours instead of 100. Need some clarification whether process remains the same, i.e. pre-emptive verification if pilot desires, etc.
The rest is fluff and stuff.
Impression:
Solid industry leading contract. I would have preferred more monetization of profit sharing into fixed rates. But, if this board is any indication, the pilot group likely wants to carry the risk associated with PS.
RA wants us to lead the industry in pay rates. He also knows the PS is an expense, contrary to what I read here. It is profit that could go to capital expenditures or to shareholders. If he is on the hook to pay us, it's an expense. We clearly wanted to retain PS and I bet he wants to keep it in place as well in order to provide motivation. He is going to count PS as part of total compensation, as he should. Adding our profit sharing to the 3.5% margin on AA, we will be well ahead of AA in good years and firmly ahead on breakeven or worse years.
RJ flying transfer to mainline continues.
I'll vote for it if it makes it through the MEC
Ratified 60%
#6490
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,169
Fair enough. I'm just passing along what I'm witnessing at the meeting for those that couldn't make it. Since you have better information than John Morgado, please share.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post