Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2015, 06:25 PM
  #6081  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
They started listening to the pilots.
Maybe. If so, why weren't they listening in the first place? How will the company view the MEC now? Credible? How could they believe that when the MEC pulls a bait and switch? Will they reward us for electing a MEC that can't be relied upon to actually be the voice of the pilot group? Whose in charge here?
SharpestTool is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:25 PM
  #6082  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Many on this board have set themselves up by having ridiculous and unrealistic expectations. Even if it is a good TA, it couldn't possibly be enough to satisfy many here. For example, someone just floated the rumor of pay raises that amounts to AMR + 2%, and we retain most of the PS. While one can debate the merit of that and the rest, it amounts to 21.5% compounded over 3 years. Know anyone in your neighborhood getting that deal? I certainly wouldn't be crying about it too loud.

That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
Not if the rumored 5.75% PS giveback is true.
BusDrvr is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:29 PM
  #6083  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by BusDrvr
Not if the rumored 5.75% PS giveback is true.
Sure it is. 5.75% of that figure goes from variable (at risk) compensation to fixed compensation. Last time I checked, profit is not guaranteed. In fact I endured a bankruptcy as a consequence of the lack of profits.
SharpestTool is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:33 PM
  #6084  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Maybe. If so, why weren't they listening in the first place? How will the company view the MEC now? Credible? How could they believe that when the MEC pulls a bait and switch? Will they reward us for electing a MEC that can't be relied upon to actually be the voice of the pilot group? Whose in charge here?
That has been a question asked by many.....
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:33 PM
  #6085  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,994
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Maybe. If so, why weren't they listening in the first place? How will the company view the MEC now? Credible? How could they believe that when the MEC pulls a bait and switch? Will they reward us for electing a MEC that can't be relied upon to actually be the voice of the pilot group? Whose in charge here?
I don't know why they weren't listening but hopefully they are now. And perhaps they were listening all along, but the pilots didn't start communicating until late in the game.

I don't care how the company views the MEC because I'm not sure it's relevant. The company doesn't reward anything...it tries to maximize profits and stock price (as every shareholder, including me, would expect). If the MEC is telling them they don't think the TA will pass, then the ball is back to the company.

I don't believe this offer is the last-best. I think it's the first-worst. And there's plenty of time to bring up the bar as the PS formula we're almost all happy with remains in place.
TED74 is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:34 PM
  #6086  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ImTumbleweed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Many on this board have set themselves up by having ridiculous and unrealistic expectations. Even if it is a good TA, it couldn't possibly be enough to satisfy many here. For example, someone just floated the rumor of pay raises that amounts to AMR + 2%, and we retain most of the PS. While one can debate the merit of that and the rest, it amounts to 21.5% compounded over 3 years. Know anyone in your neighborhood getting that deal? I certainly wouldn't be crying about it too loud.

That also would represent the top contract in the industry. Not good enough though. Really, nothing rational will meet the APC standard.
I have FIVE BILLION reasons to disagree with you.

FIVE BILLION.
ImTumbleweed is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:38 PM
  #6087  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
I don't know why they weren't listening bit hopefully they are now. And perhaps they were listening all along, but the pilots didn't start communicating until late in the game.

I don't care how the company views the MEC because I'm not sure it's relevant. The company doesn't reward anything...it tries to maximize profits and stock price (as every shareholder, including me, would expect). If the MEC is telling them they don't think the TA will pass, then the ball is back to the company.

I don't believe this offer is the last-best. I think it's the first-worst. And there's plenty of time to bring up the bar as the PS formula we're almost all happy with remains in place.
Would you negotiate with someone who says we have a deal and then says, well not really, just kidding? More importantly would you reward that behavior by offering them a superior deal? Remember, the MEC gave the green light for the table position. Most importantly, can you show me an example where that tactic has worked in this business? What airline union has actually pulled that off?
SharpestTool is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:38 PM
  #6088  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Sure it is. 5.75% of that figure goes from variable (at risk) compensation to fixed compensation. Last time I checked, profit is not guaranteed. In fact I endured a bankruptcy as a consequence of the lack of profits.
Nothing is guaranteed. I can live with variable compensation. What bothers me is taking money out of one pocket and putting it in the other and calling it a raise. I question the motives of anyone that tries to sell that kind of logic.
BusDrvr is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:38 PM
  #6089  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ImTumbleweed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Sure it is. 5.75% of that figure goes from variable (at risk) compensation to fixed compensation. Last time I checked, profit is not guaranteed. In fact I endured a bankruptcy as a consequence of the lack of profits.
I (still) have FIVE BILLION reasons do disagree with you.

FIVE BILLION.
ImTumbleweed is offline  
Old 06-07-2015, 06:38 PM
  #6090  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,994
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Sure it is. 5.75% of that figure goes from variable (at risk) compensation to fixed compensation. Last time I checked, profit is not guaranteed. In fact I endured a bankruptcy as a consequence of the lack of profits.
But your pay rates didn't yield during bankruptcy, right? If we transfer PS into pay, it can never be taken away...amirightoramiright?
TED74 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices