Details on Delta TA
05-25-2015, 07:00 PM
#4842
Straight QOL, homie
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
You know the last MEC meeting was rough. F-bombs were dropped, feelings were hurt. Massive concessions were signed off on by the thinnest majority; pilot surveys were ignored.
Let's take a couple of days to put things back together.
I'm an "on target" guy. Are your sources by any chance "on time" guys?
05-25-2015, 07:02 PM
#4843
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Work
Posts: 507
Oops " Adding 125 76 seat jets would equate to 450 76 seat jets and if it was unlimited 70 seaters as well, it would then go above the current cap of 450. " He went on to say this rumor does not pass the logic test.
05-25-2015, 07:05 PM
#4844
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
I've heard exactly the opposite from reputable sources.
You know the last MEC meeting was rough. F-bombs were dropped, feelings were hurt. Massive concessions were signed off on by the thinnest majority; pilot surveys were ignored.
Let's take a couple of days to put things back together.
I'm an "on target" guy. Are your sources by any chance "on time" guys?
You know the last MEC meeting was rough. F-bombs were dropped, feelings were hurt. Massive concessions were signed off on by the thinnest majority; pilot surveys were ignored.
Let's take a couple of days to put things back together.
I'm an "on target" guy. Are your sources by any chance "on time" guys?
For a dude with no real information, you sure are full of very specific advice.
Do you roll up to the cockpit when deadheading and ask if the dude/ettes flying need some advice too?
05-25-2015, 07:08 PM
#4845
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Healthy debate is good.
If that upsets you, get ready. The demographics are changing within the dues paying membership. Adapt or become extinct.
05-25-2015, 07:10 PM
#4847
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
You are so barking up the wrong tree.
Until the last few pages this has only been a Chicken Little Festival.
Let us debate. But without real, and I mean real TA stuff...there isn't anything to debate.
Call your lec reps. Talk to them. Adjust the course and ask questions. It's so simple I could do it.
Until the last few pages this has only been a Chicken Little Festival.
Let us debate. But without real, and I mean real TA stuff...there isn't anything to debate.
Call your lec reps. Talk to them. Adjust the course and ask questions. It's so simple I could do it.
05-25-2015, 07:13 PM
#4848
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Which was? This is exactly my point. You have 'sources' who 'say'. Great. I have a source that says I'm the best pilot on the planet. She's my mom. And also says I'm very good at brushing my teeth. She also thinks I'm still 10.
I digress. A source is not the source. You fill the waves here with constantly with vitriol and innuendo that the sky is falling.
Is it? Hell if I know. But it isn't just this second. And until I see what a TA brings, I'm not ringing the bell and screaming it to the town.
05-25-2015, 07:17 PM
#4849
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
I've heard exactly the opposite from reputable sources.
You know the last MEC meeting was rough. F-bombs were dropped, feelings were hurt. Massive concessions were signed off on by the thinnest majority; pilot surveys were ignored.
Let's take a couple of days to put things back together.
I'm an "on target" guy. Are your sources by any chance "on time" guys?
You know the last MEC meeting was rough. F-bombs were dropped, feelings were hurt. Massive concessions were signed off on by the thinnest majority; pilot surveys were ignored.
Let's take a couple of days to put things back together.
I'm an "on target" guy. Are your sources by any chance "on time" guys?
I'm an on target guy and so are my sources, but no reason to not be on time for no good reason, right?
I know there was some gnashing of teeth toward the end of the last meeting, but it sounded like it was more to do with the old guard being upset about no longer being in control. Massive concessions? HA! Your info is bad, brotha.
Like you, I'm a no vote on unnecessary concessions/trades... but the product has to be a good bit farther along for anything to be verifiable.
05-25-2015, 08:10 PM
#4850
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
You are so barking up the wrong tree.
Until the last few pages this has only been a Chicken Little Festival.
Let us debate. But without real, and I mean real TA stuff...there isn't anything to debate.
Call your lec reps. Talk to them. Adjust the course and ask questions. It's so simple I could do it.
Until the last few pages this has only been a Chicken Little Festival.
Let us debate. But without real, and I mean real TA stuff...there isn't anything to debate.
Call your lec reps. Talk to them. Adjust the course and ask questions. It's so simple I could do it.
The DALPA spin-machine is engaged once a TA is released for a vote.
The time to debate is NOW! BEFORE a TA is released.
The problem is DALPA isn't even letting us know what's on the table. Not even letting membership know what is being discussed.
So I'll listen to the rumors....because that is the ONLY information that is being provided to me. (other than the worthless, "your union met in closed session today for 9 hours" email)
Based on the rumors provided to me. I will vote NO.
DALPA know this: The demographics of your dues paying members are changing. Adapt or become extinct.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
