Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2015, 04:40 AM
  #4311  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
What was the TAKE, for the pilot group, when they GAVE up pay/retirement/work rules during the bankruptcy TA's?
A few that I recall...

From LOA 46 (pre-BK):
-- Targeted 11% DC plan
-- Pilot - Pilot Swap Board
-- Bidding for CQ (delayed implementation)

From LOA $51 (BK):
-- $2.1B cash upon exiting BK
-- Requirement to remove 6 seats from all 76-seat jets if Troy Kane furloughed
-- Increased PS
-- MPPP distributed to pilots for self-investment
-- Flowback JS

Not that any of these came close to making them "cost-neutral" by any means...
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 04:54 AM
  #4312  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
A few that I recall...

From LOA 46 (pre-BK):
-- Targeted 11% DC plan
-- Pilot - Pilot Swap Board
-- Bidding for CQ (delayed implementation)

From LOA $51 (BK):
-- $2.1B cash upon exiting BK
-- Requirement to remove 6 seats from all 76-seat jets if Troy Kane furloughed
-- Increased PS
-- MPPP distributed to pilots for self-investment
-- Flowback JS

Not that any of these came close to making them "cost-neutral" by any means...
Thanks Alan.
I wasn't sincerely asking the question, and not trying to come across as argumentative.

The point I was moreorless trying to make is that I believe contract negotiations are about realistic leverage as opposed to equal amounts of give and take.

To ask another question. How was the $2.1 billion distributed? I'm assuming this was small payout to each pilot after the pension fund was liquidated. Is that accurate?
DeadHead is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 06:20 AM
  #4313  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
The point I was moreorless trying to make is that I believe contract negotiations are about realistic leverage as opposed to equal amounts of give and take.
Agreed. In down times, it's more give than take (although often not enough to satisfy the company), and in up times it's more take than give (although often not enough to satisfy the pilots).

Originally Posted by DeadHead
How was the $2.1 billion distributed? I'm assuming this was small payout to each pilot after the pension fund was liquidated. Is that accurate?
It was paid out after Delta emerged from BK, which was after the pension was terminated. About 2/3 of the amount was coming in any case, while the other 1/3 was the result of that termination. The size of each pilot's payout was determined by a formula that considered a number of factors, including a pilot's seniority, his pay rate, his age, his status as active or inactive, etc.

Being fairly junior at the time, my pay out filled up my 415(c) for several years with the remaining cash putting me well into AMT.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 06:27 AM
  #4314  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Thanks Alan.
I wasn't sincerely asking the question, and not trying to come across as argumentative.

The point I was moreorless trying to make is that I believe contract negotiations are about realistic leverage as opposed to equal amounts of give and take.

To ask another question. How was the $2.1 billion distributed? I'm assuming this was small payout to each pilot after the pension fund was liquidated. Is that accurate?
Contract negotiations are always about leverage. There will also always be some give and take. It's the leverage that determines the percentages of the give and take.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 06:37 AM
  #4315  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Contract negotiations are always about leverage. There will also always be some give and take. It's the leverage that determines the percentages of the give and take.
I don't quantify taking $100 out of someone's pocket, then handing them a $5 bill as a give and take. I look at it as someone taking $95 out of somebody's pocket.

The bankruptcy LOAs cost the pilots ALOT more than it did the company. I don't see at as unreasonable to think that C2015 should cost the company ALOT more than it does the pilot group. I don't believe we should be giving any concessions, and if it is part of the deal than we should demand an apples to apples cost comparison.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 06:50 AM
  #4316  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Contract negotiations are always about leverage. There will also always be some give and take.
Right now, for us, it's not "give and take." Compromise for us in this environment means "take or take slightly less."

As always, thanks for being the anchor.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 07:15 AM
  #4317  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 335
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Agreed. In down times, it's more give than take (although often not enough to satisfy the company), and in up times it's more take than give (although often not enough to satisfy the pilots).



It was paid out after Delta emerged from BK, which was after the pension was terminated. About 2/3 of the amount was coming in any case, while the other 1/3 was the result of that termination. The size of each pilot's payout was determined by a formula that considered a number of factors, including a pilot's seniority, his pay rate, his age, his status as active or inactive, etc.

Being fairly junior at the time, my pay out filled up my 415(c) for several years with the remaining cash putting me well into AMT.
If I recall, the claim ($2.1B) was not part of the pension termination it was just a claim for BK concessions. We got a $650M note for the termination.
Falcon7 is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 07:21 AM
  #4318  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7
If I recall, the claim ($2.1B) was not part of the pension termination it was just a claim for BK concessions. We got a $650M note for the termination.
True. I was referring to the full amount that we received, having pre-sold the $2.1B claim for some 60 cents on the dollar.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 07:21 AM
  #4319  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 335
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
I don't quantify taking $100 out of someone's pocket, then handing them a $5 bill as a give and take. I look at it as someone taking $95 out of somebody's pocket.

The bankruptcy LOAs cost the pilots ALOT more than it did the company. I don't see at as unreasonable to think that C2015 should cost the company ALOT more than it does the pilot group. I don't believe we should be giving any concessions, and if it is part of the deal than we should demand an apples to apples cost comparison.
I think that's what folks are talking about. There will be some give and take, there always is in every negotiation. But what matters is whether you come out ahead or behind in the give and take of negotiations. The expectation is that when the company is doing well you come out ahead. To borrow from your analogy we give $5 and get $100 back.
Falcon7 is offline  
Old 05-16-2015, 07:23 AM
  #4320  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 335
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
True. I was referring to the full amount that we received, having pre-sold the $2.1B claim for some 60 cents on the dollar.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Falcon7 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices