Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:20 PM
  #4141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,169
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I know you have no desire to debate. Just the same stuff that passes in the echo chamber and staunch defense of all things DALPA.

Boring and predictable.

Carl
Can we at least agree that no matter what comes out in a TA, you will be crying foul and claiming that DALPA is trying to put one over the pilot group?

I can't imagine a scenario where you might actually support a TA. Talk about predictable. The only part I don't get is your agenda.
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 06:31 PM
  #4142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Carl, your idea of debate is overwhelming the audience with your noise. If anyone disagrees with you, they are labeled as part of the surrender early crowd or whatever the insult du jour is.

I have no desire to debate with you. I had my fill 3 years ago. The point of my post was simply that you are constantly railing against a growing number of Delta pilots, and can't seem to grasp that they're/we're not out to get you.

Carry on
Spot on...make the mistake of countering one of Carl's emotional outbursts with data and instantly become a surrender monkey, one of many mindless sheep or a backroom shadow MEC member conspiring with management to dupe the benighted yes voting pilot population...it gets tiresome, does it not?
Seaslap8 is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 06:34 PM
  #4143  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Can we at least agree that no matter what comes out in a TA, you will be crying foul and claiming that DALPA is trying to put one over the pilot group?
Of course not. I've posted here many times on what I'd be happy with, and what is clearly achievable in our current environment.

But can we at least agree that no matter what the criticism of your beloved DALPA, you'll dutifully somehow work in Black Helicopters or Tin Foil Hats, etc. to describe such ungrateful miscreants?

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
I can't imagine a scenario where you might actually support a TA.
If you actually read people's views instead of spouting DALPA approved insults, you'd see exactly such a scenario.

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
The only part I don't get is your agenda.
To get DALPA to behave like a labor union. Period.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 06:35 PM
  #4144  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Seaslap8
Spot on...make the mistake of countering one of Carl's emotional outbursts with data and instantly become a surrender monkey, one of many mindless sheep or a backroom shadow MEC member conspiring with management to dupe the benighted yes voting pilot population...it gets tiresome, does it not?
Look forward to some of that "data" Seaslap.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 07:00 PM
  #4145  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Seaslap8
Spot on...make the mistake of countering one of Carl's emotional outbursts with data and instantly become a surrender monkey, one of many mindless sheep or a backroom shadow MEC member conspiring with management to dupe the benighted yes voting pilot population...it gets tiresome, does it not?
speaking of "tiresome," this guy was another dalpa operative during the c12 cramdown.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 07:25 PM
  #4146  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Can we at least agree that no matter what comes out in a TA, you will be crying foul and claiming that DALPA is trying to put one over the pilot group?

I can't imagine a scenario where you might actually support a TA. Talk about predictable. The only part I don't get is your agenda.
Can we agree that the insiders here will say anything and promise anything and threaten and make ridiculous projections to get pilots to vote yes?

I would love to vote yes. After the council 16 update, that is not too likely.
gzsg is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 07:30 PM
  #4147  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
What would be the most refreshing is if we line pilots elected reps that have the courage to turn down this upcoming signed TA and send the shadow MEC back to the drawing board.

Whether you are one of the 10 reps that believe in surrendering at the earliest opportunity, or one of the 9 reps that aren't afraid to follow our process, the one thing all reps should have in common is to not be afraid of the MEC administration when they make reps irrelevant.

On another note, it is absolutely incredible that management would be allowed to "brief" our reps in closed session DURING Section 6 negotiations. The only briefing of our reps should be by the negotiators themselves...NEVER management. I've never seen such a weak MEC administration in my life.

Carl
Carl

I don't see the big deal. Our execs just happened to be in the neighborhood and all their schedules were open, so they just dropped in to say hi.

Having RA speak to the MEC on the brink of a TA was effective. Just read the council 16 update.

We surrender!
gzsg is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 07:46 PM
  #4148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,169
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Carl

I don't see the big deal. Our execs just happened to be in the neighborhood and all their schedules were open, so they just dropped in to say hi.

Having RA speak to the MEC on the brink of a TA was effective. Just read the council 16 update.

We surrender!
See that's the thing. You and I can both read the same piece of paper and somehow you take it as a surrender. Exactly which part gave you that impression?

Btw, for those interested the 16 letter is published on the dalpa website under my MEC/LEC and then click 16. If anything it is a broad overview of the past few weeks' events. Nowhere does it indicate that we are surrendering. GMAB
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 07:56 PM
  #4149  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
See that's the thing. You and I can both read the same piece of paper and somehow you take it as a surrender. Exactly which part gave you that impression?

Btw, for those interested the 16 letter is published on the dalpa website under my MEC/LEC and then click 16. If anything it is a broad overview of the past few weeks' events. Nowhere does it indicate that we are surrendering. GMAB

Council 16 Update

May 11, 2015

During the week of May 4, your MEC met in regular session in Atlanta and spent a considerable amount of time interacting with the Negotiating Committee regarding Contract 2015. These discussions, as well as an extensive session with Richard Anderson and the Delta senior executives, were all conducted in executive session.

As we progress toward a TA, your Council 16 representatives regard the contract survey as our guide, the framework for our future as Delta pilots. While we do not think that we know better than our constituents—we embrace the views reflected in the survey data—you did elect us to know more by virtue of the information to which we have access. The information this week, most often confidential in nature, included briefings from various subject-matter experts, our Pilot Director Ken Rogers, the investment banker Steven Presser who proctored our bankruptcy claim, and Mr. Anderson and his team.

A battle plan never survives first contact with the enemy, or as Mike Tyson so eloquently stated, “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.” From the first round of negotiations, portions of our battle plan have fallen by the wayside, others have changed dramatically, and some continue to provide for our strategy going forward. When the time comes to bring the TA to you, our brothers and sisters of LAX, we will be in the lounge and on the road to explain our thought processes, clearly outline our decisions, and discuss the information that influenced those decisions made by the MEC.

We will not be swayed by emotion or fear, nor will we endeavor to lead by popular opinion. In every section of the contract we have utilized the tools at hand, to include the contract survey, e-mails, phone conversations, and feedback gathered from flying the line. These we synthesized with the company business plan to arrive at the best, most value added direction for our negotiators, and ultimately for the pilots of Delta Air Lines.

We are optimistic about reaching an agreement with management that you and the pilots of Delta will embrace, and we are enthusiastic about the progress made thus far.

We look forward to seeing everyone at the next council meeting at the Proud Bird Restaurant, 11022 Aviation Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90045, on June 11 at 1100.

Fraternally,

Tim, Dan, and Tony
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-11-2015, 09:51 PM
  #4150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,599
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Of course not. I've posted here many times on what I'd be happy with, and what is clearly achievable in our current environment.

But can we at least agree that no matter what the criticism of your beloved DALPA, you'll dutifully somehow work in Black Helicopters or Tin Foil Hats, etc. to describe such ungrateful miscreants?



If you actually read people's views instead of spouting DALPA approved insults, you'd see exactly such a scenario.



To get DALPA to behave like a labor union. Period.

Carl
I completely agree that the significant raises you seek are achievable. However, I believe they are achievable after 3-5 years of negotiations. Might as well take the rumored 25% raise over 3 years now since its going to take that long anyway.

Time value of money. If the contract is indeed 3 years, mathematically its very difficult to not leave money on the table turning down a contract so short.
Trip7 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices