Details on Delta TA
#3902
Now, why can't you even use the word RESTORATION?
Carl
#3903
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
You know bro, I have said this before and I will say this again. You, Carl, Jerry and others need to represent us at DALPA.
I almost always agree with you gents.
Just the other day, I too, was doing math. My conclusion, there is no way that I will earn enough money in the Bfund to net me 60% FAE upon retirement.
We have some great salespeople.
TEN
My only hope is that pilots like you, RUN FOR OFFICE and implement some changes.
I almost always agree with you gents.
Just the other day, I too, was doing math. My conclusion, there is no way that I will earn enough money in the Bfund to net me 60% FAE upon retirement.
We have some great salespeople.
TEN
My only hope is that pilots like you, RUN FOR OFFICE and implement some changes.
How this MEC can pretend the last 10 years never happened is beyond me.
#3904
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Karnak, if you aren't willing to fight for restoration, just get out of the way.
#3905
Of course not. How on Earth do you come up with that canard?
Carl
#3906
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Both. Did somebody surgically remove your spine?
No. Pay rates back to the peak in C2K on date of signing. Profit sharing is a separate discussion after C2015 ratification.
As long as the $325 an hour is on date of signing, yes.
See above.
Yes. I kept my teeth...and my spine.
No you don't ERflyer. You DON'T want this. You're fighting as hard as you possibly can to ensure it doesn't happen. Why you do it, is an open question.
Hopefully this helps.
Carl
No. Pay rates back to the peak in C2K on date of signing. Profit sharing is a separate discussion after C2015 ratification.
As long as the $325 an hour is on date of signing, yes.
See above.
Yes. I kept my teeth...and my spine.
No you don't ERflyer. You DON'T want this. You're fighting as hard as you possibly can to ensure it doesn't happen. Why you do it, is an open question.
Hopefully this helps.
Carl
I'm just trying to interject some realism. Restoration won't happen because your employer will never give it to you. I do want it but I know it'll never happen. Sorry. Reality sucks.
Knowing that your employer won't give you a raise that would be 50% more than what its competitors pays their pilots leads to the next logical step: what tactic do I use to get the most I can?
Your tactics, asking for unrealistic raises, in my opinion, will get me less money. I'm just stating what the better, realistic, tactic is to gain the largest pay raise I possibly can.
#3907
#3908
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 5-9 block, kill removing
Posts: 385
That doesn't really help.
I'm just trying to interject some realism. Restoration won't happen because your employer will never give it to you. I do want it but I know it'll never happen. Sorry. Reality sucks.
Knowing that your employer won't give you a raise that would be 50% more than what its competitors pays their pilots leads to the next logical step: what tactic do I use to get the most I can?
Your tactics, asking for unrealistic raises, in my opinion, will get me less money. I'm just stating what the better, realistic, tactic is to gain the largest pay raise I possibly can.
I'm just trying to interject some realism. Restoration won't happen because your employer will never give it to you. I do want it but I know it'll never happen. Sorry. Reality sucks.
Knowing that your employer won't give you a raise that would be 50% more than what its competitors pays their pilots leads to the next logical step: what tactic do I use to get the most I can?
Your tactics, asking for unrealistic raises, in my opinion, will get me less money. I'm just stating what the better, realistic, tactic is to gain the largest pay raise I possibly can.
I'm curious, what evidence pdo you have that asking for "an unrealistic raise" will ultimately result in "less"? I'm interested in real life data, because this really seems like conjecture and emotional opinion, not fact based cause and effect.
Last edited by Raging white; 05-06-2015 at 05:46 PM. Reason: Poor wording
#3909
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
RA and Mike Campbell laugh every day about how stupid we are.
700% for us and 3% for the lame pilots.
#3910
No you don't want it ERflyer. Like Karnak, you passionately and vigorously make the case to not even try. It's who you are ace. Own it.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post