Details on Delta TA
#2922
Now, how about an answer to this question...since tsquare refuses to answer:
Carl
#2923
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
I'm no Obama fan or cheerleader but our economy is doing much better today than it was the day he took office. You can't say the same thing for GWB. We were in very deep recession the day Bush left office. Some economists even say we were borderline depression. Go ahead spin away
Its an understatement to call it burning the furniture to heat the house. Its more like burning the house to heat the house. When reality sets it, its going to suck. A lot.
I'm glad we're paying down debt but I think its a huge mistake down the road for us to be throwing billions onto the bonfire of "shareholder return" when we still have so much more work to do with debt, future capex, employee investment and much still needed infrastructure. In the long run that would do more for share prices than the current short burst of multi billion dollar purging.
#2924
Before any one feels to bad for Carl remember his hourly pay rate at NWA before the merger was 178 an hour. The tough NWA MEC had locked that in for 6 years with tiny raises.
Carl then 178.00
Carl today 340.00 effective pay rate with the DC plan and profit sharing.
Carls effective raise since the merger by the totally worthless ALPA?
90% plus a bit!
Epic fail according to Carl!
Carl then 178.00
Carl today 340.00 effective pay rate with the DC plan and profit sharing.
Carls effective raise since the merger by the totally worthless ALPA?
90% plus a bit!
Epic fail according to Carl!
Second, comparing pay rates only, with pay rates plus DC plus profit sharing is disingenuous. Everyone (except you) will see that.
Third, what does any of that have to do with ALPA's E&FA guys recommending an acceptance of 3%, 3% during these wildly profitable times?
Carl
#2925
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 413
[QUOTE=sailingfun;1749284]
Why do you constantly do this effective rate nonsense? Carl had a pension when you are taking about his 178 per hour, so if you are going to use profit sharing, which you shouldn't, and the DC plan, please include his pension. Also, you're comparing apples to oranges; legacy carriers were bleeding then, and Delta is making so much money right now it's giving it back to shareholders. ALPA isn't either extreme, in my opinion. They aren't some evil arm of management trying to screw the line pilot, but they clearly have made many mistakes, from scope to pension losses, pay, etc. A reasonable discussion of the union needs have both sides shown, and not just detractors and cheerleaders.
C2012 will be 3.5 years in duration on the amendable date. How you can call that a "very short contract" is beyond me.
Really it was 3 and you know that. Tell us about the length of the contracts at other airlines!
Before any one feels to bad for Carl remember his hourly pay rate at NWA before the merger was 178 an hour. The tough NWA MEC had locked that in for 6 years with tiny raises.
Carl then 178.00
Carl today 340.00 effective pay rate with the DC plan and profit sharing.
Carls effective raise since the merger by the totally worthless ALPA?
90% plus a bit!
Epic fail according to Carl!
Really it was 3 and you know that. Tell us about the length of the contracts at other airlines!
Before any one feels to bad for Carl remember his hourly pay rate at NWA before the merger was 178 an hour. The tough NWA MEC had locked that in for 6 years with tiny raises.
Carl then 178.00
Carl today 340.00 effective pay rate with the DC plan and profit sharing.
Carls effective raise since the merger by the totally worthless ALPA?
90% plus a bit!
Epic fail according to Carl!
#2926
What they really meant to say is: "A contract's a contract. See ya in 2016."
Carl
#2927
There have been many many trillions of fake money created and pumped into the economy at essentially zero interest, and especially the stock market for them to play with. All of that is a huge debt trap later. We have a lot of big, hungry chickens that will "come home to roost" as a certain someone's beloved mentor has phrased it.
Its an understatement to call it burning the furniture to heat the house. Its more like burning the house to heat the house. When reality sets it, its going to suck. A lot.
I'm glad we're paying down debt but I think its a huge mistake down the road for us to be throwing billions onto the bonfire of "shareholder return" when we still have so much more work to do with debt, future capex, employee investment and much still needed infrastructure. In the long run that would do more for share prices than the current short burst of multi billion dollar purging.
Its an understatement to call it burning the furniture to heat the house. Its more like burning the house to heat the house. When reality sets it, its going to suck. A lot.
I'm glad we're paying down debt but I think its a huge mistake down the road for us to be throwing billions onto the bonfire of "shareholder return" when we still have so much more work to do with debt, future capex, employee investment and much still needed infrastructure. In the long run that would do more for share prices than the current short burst of multi billion dollar purging.
Carl
#2928
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
You are correct sir, but you've forgotten a very important point. Management is paid primarily in stock and options. While what you state would indeed be in the long term best interests of our airline, it would not be in the best interest of maximum short term stock price. By "throwing billions into the shareholder value bonfire", they are actually transferring money for Delta's future...to their own pockets. That's our dilemma.
Carl
Carl
Look at Honda or Toyota, two brands known for long term quality. Either could destroy/monetize their own long term quality tomorrow, transfer a ton of money to their investors and it would be a year or two before word got out, their brand got tarnished by the customers and by then they could be long gone. Ditto for any company of course.
#2929
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A330 First Officer
Posts: 1,465
Yep, I'm at $275k for the year so far, 88 Driver is full of doo doo. With 5 pay periods to go I'm going to gross over 340k on the year. My highest earning year under C2K was $234k. That had no profit sharing and no DC plan either. I'm finding this board to be more and more worthless, and nothing but a sounding board for the whiners. That's why I don't bother coming here very often. It used to be useful and funny.
#2930
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,740
You are correct sir, but you've forgotten a very important point. Management is paid primarily in stock and options. While what you state would indeed be in the long term best interests of our airline, it would not be in the best interest of maximum short term stock price. By "throwing billions into the shareholder value bonfire", they are actually transferring money for Delta's future...to their own pockets. That's our dilemma.
Carl
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post