Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2014, 05:07 AM
  #1991  
ready for mo money
 
pilotjockey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Left Behind
Posts: 84
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco
<<<<Quote:
I have some ideas, but it would be foolish to post them here.>>>>

But yet, some think that publishing survey results here is "unfoolish"? I think everyone thinks that for the most part that pilots "think like they do" and that there is going to be this unified support on every issue that they hold dear like "CDOs." (We can see from the DPA survey that they aren't that unpopular over there).

The perception now is a vast majority of pilots do not want CDOs (I certainly don't) but say the survey shows a majority of pilots actually want them? The company comes to the table demanding them.... Do you have more or less leverage with the company knowing exactly the percentage of pilots who want them?

To me it is exactly the same reason you wouldn't publish your complete strategy (assuming you were actually in a position to implement it and not just typing on a forum) until you were ready for action.
the Detroit Pilots Association is attempting to wreck my career as badly as the alpo clan

displaying a contract survey for the company to see???? wth?
talk about shooting all of us in the foot right before we are about to negotiate a new contract with the company actually making record profits

ygbsm, the madness and idiocy of that group knows no bounds
pilotjockey is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 05:39 AM
  #1992  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,431
Default

Originally Posted by pilotjockey
the Detroit Pilots Association is attempting to wreck my career as badly as the alpo clan

displaying a contract survey for the company to see???? wth?
talk about shooting all of us in the foot right before we are about to negotiate a new contract with the company actually making record profits

ygbsm, the madness and idiocy of that group knows no bounds
Agreed. I refuse to ever go to the DPA site. Why? Because they aren't the certified collective bargaining agent for the Delta pilots. The arrogance that the donut crowd is displaying by even having such an item on their website is astounding.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 05:59 AM
  #1993  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Negotiations involve give and take. This example was unusual in that some of the give and take happened after some TA language was agreed to.

While the entire CDO part was a mess, the end result was very good. "What happened" is that reserve long callout remained where it had been since C2K at 12 hours. "What happened" was that the ADG kicks in Nov 1, effective forever from that point forward,
"What happened" is that DALPA gave up the 13 hour callout it already secured to get rid of the CDOs it foolishly asked for.

"What happened" is that the company got the benefits of the LOA immediately--and relief from our contractual protections--IMMEDIATELY. We have to wait 6 months to enjoy our upside.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 06:00 AM
  #1994  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon
Do you believe our elected reps or negotiating committee is unintelligent?
No.

So there must be some other explanation for their utter failure to deliver for the line pilot at the negotiating table.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 06:13 AM
  #1995  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
I certainly agree on no erosion of QOL or productivity.

That said, I'm intrigued by Option B in Question 28 of the survey. This is the question on pay banding and asks if we would be in favor in a staffing neutral way, e.g., more vacation. This could give the pilot group fewer trips to Virginia Avenue in exchange for more vacation, saving us more negotiating dollars for $$$, while not reducing pilot staffing or requiring more work.

Thoughts on that?
That is a concession. It reeks of cost neutrality. Why on earth would we do that?

My thoughts are, you are floating another lead trial balloon for DALPA.

My thoughts are, only a hardened hack would attempt to spin the concession of longer freezes as a positive by promoting it as "fewer trips to Virginia Avenue."

You appear to have abandoned all pretense of being a neutral line pilot unaffiliated with DALPA. Or are you still trying to obfuscate your intent?
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 06:17 AM
  #1996  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
"What happened" is that DALPA gave up the 13 hour callout it already secured to get rid of the CDOs it foolishly asked for.
I believe it was the company, not us, who asked for the CDOs.

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
"What happened" is that the company got the benefits of the LOA immediately--and relief from our contractual protections--IMMEDIATELY. We have to wait 6 months to enjoy our upside.
What benefits and what protections? We got our ability to leave the phone off for 9 hours or more on long call back, and the reserve pilots who had been illegally subjected to pay loss were made whole, both as of the date of signing.

We wait 6 months for the 5:15 ADG, and the company waits the same amount of time for the new PWA duty limits.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 06:22 AM
  #1997  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,588
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank

"What happened" is that DALPA gave up the 13 hour callout it already secured to get rid of the CDOs it foolishly asked for.

"What happened" is that the company got the benefits of the LOA immediately--and relief from our contractual protections--IMMEDIATELY. We have to wait 6 months to enjoy our upside.
You can't seem to wrap your head around the concept that everything is a cost item. As I pointed out we offered CDO's as a small offset to big cost increase of 5:15. Had we not offered it in the first place the 13 hour call out may not have been in the package. We wanted the CDO part back so the 12 hour call out came back. I believe the pay no credit for the 5:15 until November had been dropped prior to the CDO issue.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 06:34 AM
  #1998  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Why on earth would we do that?
Because I'd rather spend time on vacation than in training, all other things being equal. And if I can more vacation by training less and not losing pay when I stay on my same equipment, I fully expect to see that much more in pay rates.

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
My thoughts are, you are floating another lead trial balloon for DALPA.
My thoughts are, this balloon was floated by DALPA in the survey, and I for one find it interesting.

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
...only a hardened hack would attempt to spin the concession of longer freezes as a positive by promoting it as "fewer trips to Virginia Avenue."
Who said anything about longer freezes? I have friends at UAL who tell me that their normal freeze is 24 months, but you can always get out of a freeze to bid into a higher paying band.

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
You appear to have abandoned all pretense of being a neutral line pilot unaffiliated with DALPA. Or are you still trying to obfuscate your intent?
You appear to have abandoned all pretense of being a neutral line pilot who is willing to have an adult conversation about issues facing us today.

I know you're capable of better. Why are you so afraid to simply talk about these issues?
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 06:48 AM
  #1999  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Oberon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 757/767
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
No.

So there must be some other explanation for their utter failure to deliver for the line pilot at the negotiating table.
What "utter failure"? What's your hypothesis on why our elected reps and negotiating committee fails to deliver for the line pilot (paraphrasing)?
Oberon is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 07:20 AM
  #2000  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Would ya'll please stop quoting PDs incessant juvenile lunacy. It is so much nicer here when I don't have to read the rants of someone living in his parents' basement and whining about having to pay rent.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices