Search

Notices

DAL Poolie Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2014, 04:28 AM
  #3071  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by lear700pilot
I do agree with the age way. Funny you mention that. In my prior post the senior to me guy was older by 4 months at current location. The aspect is most are not going to be just a few months age difference. there were people 10+ years older.

One other aspect is if I had been one more number senior, I would have been put on a different aircraft category, but was put on the "less desirable" airplane. Thought at the time it was a bummer, but that put me down a road of experiences and meeting individuals that I wouldn't trade anything for.

It is what it is, but no matter what someone is going to lose out. At least by age I knew that I would be employed longer than the other individuals at current property - if I so desired to stay there.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining about Delta's system and not trying to reinvent the wheel. I'm just giving perspective of an age based seniority system.

Question: is there any other airline that does it similar to Delta? I didn't know if others used last 4 ssn. Seems all the ones I've heard of use age.
United used to use the SSAN. I don't know how they do it now.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 04:30 AM
  #3072  
Line Holder
 
Deke999999's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 54
Default

Age at UAL, oldest picks first and the youngest in the 8 ball
Deke999999 is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 05:29 AM
  #3073  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,761
Default

Originally Posted by Deke999999
Age at UAL, oldest picks first and the youngest in the 8 ball
It was that way in '63.......back when you had to serve chicken baskets too.
badflaps is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 07:09 AM
  #3074  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Just to play devils advocate. So, all of you believe a guy who is 33 when hired should go ahead of the guy who is 32.5 because he has "less time" with the company.........ooooookay.....just sayin'
Absolutely. In that example, the two would likely only be one number apart anyway, with the "junior" one getting an extra 6 months at the top of the scale in a senior plane etc. Likewise, there could be a 20 year age difference in a class. Nothing wrong whatsoever with letting the older pilot get a few numbers since s/he would have to punch out decades sooner. It really is the fairest way to do it, young buck mini windfall notwithstanding.
gloopy is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 08:41 AM
  #3075  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I think it should be done by age as well. Its clearly not lawsuit material because many other places still do it that way and no one is getting sued. Its also the right thing to do for the reason you mentioned.
Not sure how you argue that discriminating between two people based on age is not age discrimination. It just seems illogical to arbitrarily ascribe value to age, especially to a greater age. The guy that's hired older is probably older because a) he elected to extend employment elsewhere for some perceived benefit, or b) he wasn't as successful in his career as a younger candidate.

If you're going to do it by age, then why not reward the younger guy, for getting there earlier in their career? Or pick the guy who did the best on his cognitive tests?

I would have done poorly with either an SSN or age, so this isn't a personal issue for me. I simply find the "older deserves more" argument somewhat odd.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 08:54 AM
  #3076  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Not sure how you argue that discriminating between two people based on age is not age discrimination. It just seems illogical to arbitrarily ascribe value to age, especially to a greater age. The guy that's hired older is probably older because a) he elected to extend employment elsewhere for some perceived benefit, or b) he wasn't as successful in his career as a younger candidate.

If you're going to do it by age, then why not reward the younger guy, for getting there earlier in their career? Or pick the guy who did the best on his cognitive tests?

I would have done poorly with either an SSN or age, so this isn't a personal issue for me. I simply find the "older deserves more" argument somewhat odd.
Totally disagree. Everyone's history is different. I got out of the Navy in April of 81 at the age of 29. The controllers went on strike shortly after. ALL hiring stopped. By the time any hiring started again, I was over 30 which was the kiss of death at the time to be hired at any "Major". It wasn't until 4 years later that the age limit started to ease and I was hired at NWA. It had nothing to do with my decision to remain at my current job or poor performance on my part.
maddogmax is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 09:37 AM
  #3077  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,012
Default

I suspect you're on an island with this opinion, Sink r8. Let's not forget that the entire airline system - seniority - has almost nothing to do with deserving anything. It's all about time on property. Time on earth (the reciprocal of time left with the company) is most analogous to the rest of airline career determinants. It's the only deciding factor that most (yourself excluded) at least think has some logic and purpose behind it. Basing seniority on performance on a cog test makes even less sense (to me) than the randomness of SSN.
TED74 is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 09:57 AM
  #3078  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax
Totally disagree. Everyone's history is different. I got out of the Navy in April of 81 at the age of 29. The controllers went on strike shortly after. ALL hiring stopped. By the time any hiring started again, I was over 30 which was the kiss of death at the time to be hired at any "Major". It wasn't until 4 years later that the age limit started to ease and I was hired at NWA. It had nothing to do with my decision to remain at my current job or poor performance on my part.
That's totally fine. We can add "bad luck", or "poor timing" to the list of reasons. My question is why that would entitle you to special treatment, vs someone who was younger?

I'm just asking the question, not trying to slam any group.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 09:59 AM
  #3079  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,190
Default

Must be a slow week if this is what we've devolved into arguing about

I really got screwed!!! I was younger, better looking, smarter, more motivated, higher achieving than all those old, slackass bums in my newhire class. However, NWA decided that youngest had to go last, thus I will spend most of my career looking up at these sub-humans. The great part is the last 4 of my SSN "suck" too so I was doomed either way (<---- TIC for the humor impaired)

Seriously, unless your class has 75 pilots like the one that just started Monday, it will all come out in the wash over the course of a long career. I get that 1 number can make or break it, from time to time, but this is out of everyone's control and even the most junior guy from last Monday's class already has 75 pilots behind him! This is an absolutely incredible time for anyone to be getting on. Unfortunately somebody has to be the plug, but for the time being that status is pretty short-lived.
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 10:03 AM
  #3080  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,012
Default

Agree. Couldn't care less right now. But I wouldn't mind getting it right(er) before every single number starts to matter at some point in the future.
TED74 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Trash Hauler
Major
138
06-11-2012 06:48 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
32
05-30-2012 03:51 AM
FIIGMO
Major
120
05-15-2012 07:54 PM
AerisArmis
Cargo
9
12-01-2010 05:50 PM
acl65pilot
Major
36
10-29-2008 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices