Delta Hiring News
#2411
I found the most difficult part was flying with different Captains with minimal briefing (eg one wants high and fast to save gas vs the one who wants you to get configured early and the differences in applying "standard" procedures). It was easy to confuse technique vs procedure. After about three months you get comfortable and can begin to be more proactive vs reactive. It's a matter of data points and the amount of variables intoduced.
#2412
That is precisely my point. Just trying to give the new hire military guys a dose of reality.
#2413
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,753
As a single seat guy, that first 4 day was a blur (humbling, yes), but the learning curve was steep as far as operating procedures.
I found the most difficult part was flying with different Captains with minimal briefing (eg one wants high and fast to save gas vs the one who wants you to get configured early and the differences in applying "standard" procedures). It was easy to confuse technique vs procedure. After about three months you get comfortable and can begin to be more proactive vs reactive. It's a matter of data points and the amount of variables intoduced.
I found the most difficult part was flying with different Captains with minimal briefing (eg one wants high and fast to save gas vs the one who wants you to get configured early and the differences in applying "standard" procedures). It was easy to confuse technique vs procedure. After about three months you get comfortable and can begin to be more proactive vs reactive. It's a matter of data points and the amount of variables intoduced.
You should have seen it before "The summer of 1987" and the advent of CRM.
I thought it was much more fun before then, you could basically do what ever you wanted to do, as long as you didn't kill anyone. Checklists were optional, there were no headsets, no WARTS/NATS briefings, and very little automation. You just flew the 727 like it was an airplane, because it was. As a newhire F/E, I got lots of landings on the 727. The Newbs got to sit on the panel for a few years to watch and learn, so even the single seat and boat guys had figured out what was going on by the time they got to the right seat.
The pilots were much better then too, stick and rudder wise, because they hand flew every approach. And they had to think for themselves, because there was no standardization, vs. doing every thing with the standardization and all the automation like we do today. Today's pilots are great FMS programmers, and button pushers, and briefers, but pretty weak stick and rudder wise.
Yes, our safety record is much better today, but the "fun" part of the flying is pretty much gone.
Last edited by Timbo; 11-03-2013 at 04:17 PM.
#2414
As a single seat guy, that first 4 day was a blur (humbling, yes), but the learning curve was steep as far as operating procedures.
I found the most difficult part was flying with different Captains with minimal briefing (eg one wants high and fast to save gas vs the one who wants you to get configured early and the differences in applying "standard" procedures). It was easy to confuse technique vs procedure. After about three months you get comfortable and can begin to be more proactive vs reactive. It's a matter of data points and the amount of variables intoduced.
I found the most difficult part was flying with different Captains with minimal briefing (eg one wants high and fast to save gas vs the one who wants you to get configured early and the differences in applying "standard" procedures). It was easy to confuse technique vs procedure. After about three months you get comfortable and can begin to be more proactive vs reactive. It's a matter of data points and the amount of variables intoduced.
#2415
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,761
You should have seen it before "The summer of 1987" and the advent of CRM.
I thought it was much more fun before then, you could basically do what ever you wanted to do, as long as you didn't kill anyone. Checklists were optional, there were no headsets, no WARTS/NATS briefings, and very little automation. You just flew the 727 like it was an airplane, because it was. As a newhire F/E, I got lots of landings on the 727. The Newbs got to sit on the panel for a few years to watch and learn, so even the single seat and boat guys had figured out what was going on by the time they got to the right seat.
The pilots were much better then too, stick and rudder wise, because they hand flew every approach. And they had to think for themselves, because there was no standardization, vs. doing every thing with the standardization and all the automation like we do today. Today's pilots are great FMS programmers, and button pushers, and briefers, but pretty weak stick and rudder wise.
Yes, our safety record is much better today, but the "fun" part of the flying is pretty much gone.
I thought it was much more fun before then, you could basically do what ever you wanted to do, as long as you didn't kill anyone. Checklists were optional, there were no headsets, no WARTS/NATS briefings, and very little automation. You just flew the 727 like it was an airplane, because it was. As a newhire F/E, I got lots of landings on the 727. The Newbs got to sit on the panel for a few years to watch and learn, so even the single seat and boat guys had figured out what was going on by the time they got to the right seat.
The pilots were much better then too, stick and rudder wise, because they hand flew every approach. And they had to think for themselves, because there was no standardization, vs. doing every thing with the standardization and all the automation like we do today. Today's pilots are great FMS programmers, and button pushers, and briefers, but pretty weak stick and rudder wise.
Yes, our safety record is much better today, but the "fun" part of the flying is pretty much gone.
#2416
I have found the majority of Captains have been a bit leery to "let" me hand fly more and I rarely see them doing the same. I've also been on/off MLOA quite a bit, so I'm always fighting recency issues.
But I prefer the stick and rudder flying of my night job.....especially PAC off.
#2417
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,753
As you know, the personal dynamic with a Capt, F/O and young engineer was what made it fun. It was always two against one when it came to pranks. And if the Capt. was a prick, the other two would work together to punk him. Some of the pranks the two up front would play on the new engineers were hilarious.
The best part was you could fart, any time, and deny it, pointing at one of the two other guys.
Not so with only two of us up there!
#2418
There someone goes dissing another pilot group just because they think everyone should want Delta. Can we do a couple things, one get back to the topic of the thread and two stop thinking we know what's best for everyone. Keep in mind everyone is different, some people would prefer to be gone for 2 wks then home for 2 wks rather than never having a chance to unpack for 10+ years of their lives....just saying, don't judge.
Don't judge.
#2419
I wasn't dissing anybody. It was taken out of context. If you'd read my initial post, it was a forewarning to military guys, like I was, that they should not assume that based on their military expertise, the Delta world will be a piece of cake. Because, no matter how many combat sorties, or bombs dropped, or international flying time, it isn't the same.
Don't judge.
Don't judge.
I was offended.
GJ
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post