Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
05-18-2012, 07:28 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: NYC 320B
Posts: 271
Sounds like the "good old days" were traveling to Columbia with the secret service. Anybody have $100 bucks they can spare for those guys/
05-18-2012, 07:29 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
- No money flying up and down the west coast.
- No money in anything that touches the west coast.
- No money in Europe.
- No money in anything not DCI.
- No money in Comair, Pinnacle, Mesa at DCI.
- No money in not subsidizing Frontier.
- No money in our core business of flying people from A to B.
- No money in not making our core business refining fuels instead.
- No money in the Shuttle.
- No money in DCA.
- No money in all those slots at LGA.
- No money in the 787.
- No money in the C Series.
- No money in the A380.
- No money in Boston.
- No money in...
How about no money in charters (charters are not our core business). Yet a year later....... I want what they are smoking.
TEN
05-18-2012, 07:30 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,235
05-18-2012, 07:32 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,099
Don't worry, Richard was able to sell his shares before the stock fall.
Delta CEO Anderson sells $1.92M in company stock - Atlanta Business Chronicle
Delta CEO Anderson sells $1.92M in company stock - Atlanta Business Chronicle
Delta CEO Sells Stock
Last edited by KC10 FATboy; 05-18-2012 at 07:48 AM.
05-18-2012, 07:51 AM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
I know we don't have a TA, but why do we need to bail out a bad idea by allowing larger bad ideas?
I mean if a fleet of over 360 outsourced CRJ-200s on long term contracts to near bankrupt regionals is all of a sudden a bad idea, why is replacing the CRJ-200s with outsourced CRJ-900s to the same airlines a better idea?
How long til those become a bad idea and we have to move the scope line to compensate for all of these bad ides? Sure we could say "oh but that won't happen!!"
Okay, but when the first "bad idea" showed up in the early 1990s I doubt this was on anyone's radar as a swap solution to the unprofitable "bad idea":
I mean if a fleet of over 360 outsourced CRJ-200s on long term contracts to near bankrupt regionals is all of a sudden a bad idea, why is replacing the CRJ-200s with outsourced CRJ-900s to the same airlines a better idea?
How long til those become a bad idea and we have to move the scope line to compensate for all of these bad ides? Sure we could say "oh but that won't happen!!"
Okay, but when the first "bad idea" showed up in the early 1990s I doubt this was on anyone's radar as a swap solution to the unprofitable "bad idea":
05-18-2012, 07:54 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
AS adding A PDX-OGG flight, are we going to abandon Hawaii or just buy AS or HA?
05-18-2012, 07:55 AM
The Brown Dot +1
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
I know we don't have a TA, but why do we need to bail out a bad idea by allowing larger bad ideas?
I mean if a fleet of over 360 outsourced CRJ-200s on long term contracts to near bankrupt regionals is all of a sudden a bad idea, why is replacing the CRJ-200s with outsourced CRJ-900s to the same airlines a better idea?
How long til those become a bad idea and we have to move the scope line to compensate for all of these bad ides? Sure we could say "oh but that won't happen!!"
I mean when the first bad idea showed up in the early 1990s I doubt this was on anyone's radar:
I mean if a fleet of over 360 outsourced CRJ-200s on long term contracts to near bankrupt regionals is all of a sudden a bad idea, why is replacing the CRJ-200s with outsourced CRJ-900s to the same airlines a better idea?
How long til those become a bad idea and we have to move the scope line to compensate for all of these bad ides? Sure we could say "oh but that won't happen!!"
I mean when the first bad idea showed up in the early 1990s I doubt this was on anyone's radar:
05-18-2012, 08:01 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
It is interesting when you can counter a doom and gloom you better sign this mysterious TA or else because bad times are ahead with: "you know Wall Street just doesn't like your capacity cuts. We need to grow. Why aren't we growing?"
Maybe they don't realize the new found power they have to affect the industry?
effect the industry.
@#%)@#%@#)(%*$@# DENNY CRANE!
Maybe they don't realize the new found power they have to affect the industry?
effect the industry.
@#%)@#%@#)(%*$@# DENNY CRANE!
You Rang!?!
DennyCrane!!
05-18-2012, 08:10 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,538
05-18-2012, 08:19 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
I know we don't have a TA, but why do we need to bail out a bad idea by allowing larger bad ideas?
I mean if a fleet of over 360 outsourced CRJ-200s on long term contracts to near bankrupt regionals is all of a sudden a bad idea, why is replacing the CRJ-200s with outsourced CRJ-900s to the same airlines a better idea?
How long til those become a bad idea and we have to move the scope line to compensate for all of these bad ides? Sure we could say "oh but that won't happen!!"
Okay, but when the first "bad idea" showed up in the early 1990s I doubt this was on anyone's radar as a swap solution to the unprofitable "bad idea":
I mean if a fleet of over 360 outsourced CRJ-200s on long term contracts to near bankrupt regionals is all of a sudden a bad idea, why is replacing the CRJ-200s with outsourced CRJ-900s to the same airlines a better idea?
How long til those become a bad idea and we have to move the scope line to compensate for all of these bad ides? Sure we could say "oh but that won't happen!!"
Okay, but when the first "bad idea" showed up in the early 1990s I doubt this was on anyone's radar as a swap solution to the unprofitable "bad idea":
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
