Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2012, 06:15 AM
  #99241  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
If you thought that a 99 percent upfront raise was achievable then if the shoe fits what can I say!

While you may be willing to turn around and kiss, I'm not.

My percentage was put down to pull the bell curve higher. Unless my percentages were thrown out for being out of the normalized range, my 99% brought up three 10% requesters to 30%.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:19 AM
  #99242  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,704
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Suspect indeed.

For months now ALPA has been telling us that it would be foolish and irresponsible to disclose that number. That it would give management an advantage in the negotiations. Like showing your cards in poker, yada yada.
So the day the pay rate talks begin, sailingfun comes out and not only claims to know the number but posts it on a public website. And surprise surprise, its a lowball number.
Something doesn't smell right.
What number did I disclose? I simply pointed out that the surveys did not reflect a 30 percent upfront raise. I don't know the exact number. I do know about where that number came out unless my reps were making things up.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:19 AM
  #99243  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
My post was only about the upfront raise. It had nothing to do with the total raises over the life of the contract. I stand by the fact that this pilot group did not request anything like some demand on here in the upfront raise on the contract surveys.
That's a lot better.


And I'm not being sarcastic.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:20 AM
  #99244  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1

While you may be willing to turn around and kiss, I'm not.

My percentage was put down to pull the bell curve higher. Unless my percentages were thrown out for being out of the normalized range, my 99% brought up two 10% requesters to 30%.
If they saw the =average( function not working to their liking I'm sure they changed it to the more statistically relevant =median( function.

In which case your 99% didn't stand a statistical chance.

I knew we should have bribed our statistician...
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:22 AM
  #99245  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,704
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
While you may be willing to turn around and kiss, I'm not.

My percentage was put down to pull the bell curve higher. Unless my percentages were thrown out for being out of the normalized range, my 99% brought up three 10% requesters to 30%.
I have no idea how DALPA calculated the surveys. I was however always taught to get a correct number you throw out the extremes both high and low. Every survey was read by a individual. The written comments were in my mind key to the surveys. Do you think yours got more or less credibility from whoever read it?
Your number would not really move a bell curve anyway. If you averaged every survey it would have a effect. It would not change a bell curve.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:22 AM
  #99246  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
If they saw the =average( function not working to their liking I'm sure they changed it to the more statistically relevant =median( function.

In which case your 99% didn't stand a statistical chance.

I knew we should have bribed our statistician...

A risk I was willing to take.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:24 AM
  #99247  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
These will greatly affect staffing numbers (more stagnation) and would make reserve potentially very abusive.

Reserve

o Reserve guarantee

§ Increase to 72:00 – 80:00 (variable with ALV)

§ Max reserve changed from ALV to ALV + 15:00

§ Ability to pick up additional on-call days for increased reserve guarantee

o X-days

§ Increase to 13/14 for bid periods with a reserve guarantee of 72:00-74:59

§ Remain at 12/13 for bid periods with a reserve guarantee of 75:00-80:00


§ Max of seven for bid periods with a reserve guarantee of 75:00-80:00 (delayed until 14-hour int’l short call implemented under new FARs)

§ Ability to pick up additional short call period for increased reserve guarantee
These are undetailed bullet points. And they weren't a "leak" they were published.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:25 AM
  #99248  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have no idea how DALPA calculated the surveys. I was however always taught to get a correct number you throw out the extremes both high and low. Every survey was read by a individual. The written comments were in my mind key to the surveys. Do you think yours got more or less credibility from whoever read it?

My ritten coments used spell chek and corect puctuation. Eye thunk theyz wel ritten soze wy wood mey numberz knot cary tha saem wate?
scambo1 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:26 AM
  #99249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,704
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
As bad as that sounds, I hope that's where that came from.
Funny when I posted on here that I did not see myself voting yes based on the negotiations update no one accused me of working for the company or DALPA!!!!
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:31 AM
  #99250  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,704
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I am with gloopy on this. 5 weeks of vacation would allow me to take 5 months off! I would love to work only 7 months a year. Gloopy for vacation chairman!
Never do math in public. I made a mistake. If vacation paid 6 hours a day then 5 weeks vacation would allow me to take 2.5 months off. Sill not a bad deal!!!
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 08:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 01:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 09:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 07:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 05:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices