Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2012, 03:31 AM
  #99061  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default APC Hand Signals Ettiquite Proposal

Challenge: Two hands presented in the double cup position.

CA Response: Two hands in the double cup position
FO Response: One hand in the single cup position
FA Response: Both arms straight down by sides, hands cupped inward to "cup" the "objects" after years of gravity.

GA Response: Double Cup response followed by placing straight palms 1-2 inches apart, meaning I fly, but a small plane (may also work for RJ guys)

I'll give these signals a shot on my CAE-ATL-MCO flights today and Friday return If there is no report by Friday, the signals were interpreted to be sexist and I'm in jail.

Any improvements/further classifications welcome.
N9373M is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 04:27 AM
  #99062  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Brocc15
Anyone looking for a date? Here's someone I thought you guys would like from e-harmony, according to posts I've read from many of you she is just your type:

eHarmony Video Bio - YouTube
Must resis... must fight urge to vie... can't... shouldn't...fighting... trying... oh... i'm... I'm going in!

This ought to be good Brocc!
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 04:29 AM
  #99063  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Must resis... must fight urge to vie... can't... shouldn't...fighting... trying... oh... i'm... I'm going in!

This ought to be good Brocc!



worth it.

21 million views! WOW.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:18 AM
  #99064  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 80
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
It is sad, and so much of it has to do with ALPA having changed its view on the airline pilot profession. Mr. Prater and now Mr. Moak see themselves as executives, board members and politicians. As such, they grow to feel that they are far above us. Some folks like alfaromeo actually have disdain for us. In his case (and slowplay), they've both been counseled about not being such condescending d!cks to the pilots...but as alfaromeo just showed yet again, he can't do it. It comes from being high up in the MEC bureaucracy where you're not elected and unaccountable to the reps or to the pilots. All you have to do is a$$ kiss the MEC chairman, and your job is secure.

Because of this global change in attitude by ALPA higher ups, they see ALPA as more of a world power rather than a local organization to help local pilot issues. We have ALPA executives fully committed to their own advancement in business and politics, which is why so much of what they do runs in direct contravention to what we tell them we want.

The good news is that I believe ALPA really is a dying organization. Non-ALPA represented pilots are at the top of the pay heap in the cargo world and the passenger world. The best work rules reside at non-ALPA represented airlines. The best scope sections also reside at non-ALPA airlines. As more and more airlines remove ALPA from the property, our profession has a real chance to regain the respect our responsibilities should command.

Carl

Let's not forget that Moak had a chance to recapture some of this 76 seat flying at the LOCAL level during his tenure as the DALPA MEC and was the deciding vote against a staple of the CPZ pilots to the bottom of the list.
SierraWhiskey is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:18 AM
  #99065  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
So, you want SWA pay but are not willing to match SWA productivity? On what basis do you think we "deserve" that?

Because we're better looking???
Find one single quote where I ever said I want anything that SWA has...
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:21 AM
  #99066  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Needless negative speculation... the company could just as easily grow by 6000 in that period.
We won't shrink by 6000 pilots, and I can guarantee you that if we grow by 6000 it will not be organically.
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:29 AM
  #99067  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
How can you be as productive on a 777 as you can as a SWA pilot in a 737 with 5 legs a day? Delta chose which planes would be used on certain routes, and 737s all the way to Asia just can't do it. 777s have first class cabins and can pull in huge amounts of revenue from cargo uplifted on those longer routes. Southwest just can't do that. You just can't compare SWA pilots to Delta pilots, the operations are different. Just stop that nonsense.
Productivity is a stupid stupid argument that will continually be brought up because that is how we argue pay. MAde sense in the Dark Ages, but not any more... Your argument above illustrates exactly why it is a stupid methodology.
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:36 AM
  #99068  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
We are in deep trouble.

It is painful to read a post like that from a guy like Pineapple. And to log on here and see the connected guys like alfaromeo and slowplay begin their defense of this latest concessionary round of bargaining is just devastating.
This TA is gonna be ugly and its gonna pass and there's nothing we can do to stop it.

Management, the bankruptcy courts and the NMB have done their jobs efficiently and effectively.
The "reset" of the airline piloting profession over the last 10 years has been successful.

Despite our hopes, there will be no "restoration". Our union has already conceded the fight.

That's what happens when you have an MEC who's only experience is concessionary bargaining.

They were told they saved the company, by the company. They believed it ... they learned to enjoy and believe they were important to corporate management.

They have taken ownership for fixing all the company's problems.

It is a tragedy.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:53 AM
  #99069  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I tend to agree with you on our productivity. The training footprints for all the different fleets isn't our fault. Outside of all the multi-fleet training, I'd bet we are easily on par with WN productivity.

80 (4 aircraft schools in 5 and change years)
Not only that, but also having a million fleet types and then turning marketing loose to do whatever drives a penny more revenue at our expense results in a lot of very unproductive pairings that could be made much more productive if we had a single (or even just a few fewer) fleet types. When every city pair is served by a almost every plane in the fleet every day, that's why we end up with long sits and overnights that trash our productivity in addition to the massive training pipeline you mentioned. Then the company turns around and says we can't get SWA pay because we don't have SWA productivity, even though we generate more revenue per pilot, in part because of the very things that hurt our productivity, than SWA.

Then we TA more productivity all over the NNP for a player to be named later or whatever.
gloopy is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 06:01 AM
  #99070  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Brocc15
Anyone looking for a date? Here's someone I thought you guys would like from e-harmony, according to posts I've read from many of you she is just your type:

eHarmony Video Bio - YouTube
Wreck That Chick - YouTube
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices