Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2012, 12:30 PM
  #97241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Anybody wanna buy a DAL uniform overcoat (London Fog)? Never been worn, still in the bag with the tags on it. Northies?
buzzpat is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 12:40 PM
  #97242  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
ACL, understand that you and I do not measure with the same metric. My question, and ALPA's question, should first be:
  • Does this action unify Delta flying under the control of the bargaining agent for the Delta pilots?
That does not answer my question. Or more to the point on my hypothetical; Does it make you answer you question, " yes" or "no?"



Like I have said, wait and see what the facts of the agreement are before we decide to vote no. This debate is great. I am sure the company is reading every post and showing an unwillingness to be lured by another line item does not go unnoticed.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 12:48 PM
  #97243  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Originally Posted by Lysithea25
But 4000 cards sent in is very far from 4000 votes for DPA. I know a lot of people who sent in cards to let ALPA know of their displeasure, but have no intention of voting for DPA if the time comes.

Oops, in any case, guess this is for another thread eh?
Interesting 7th post you have.

The last four CAs I've flown with haven't sent cards. But they say they will if the opener sucks. Imagine that. The two previous CAs were DPA supporters. I don't know who the diehard ALPA supporter is because I've not flown with one.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 12:55 PM
  #97244  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
Interesting 7th post you have.

The last four CAs I've flown with haven't sent cards. But they say they will if the opener sucks. Imagine that. The two previous CAs were DPA supporters. I don't know who the diehard ALPA supporter is because I've not flown with one.
Frankly it's not about supporting or not supporting Alpa. It's about the process and getting agreements and a career the Dal pilots want. I do not believe that anyone supports an orginization blindly, but sees the shortcomings as items that can be fixed through the process. Nothing comes easy and there is no "easy" button that can be pushed to solve all of the ills.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 01:00 PM
  #97245  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Geeze Carl, maybe I'm a little naive but I took T's comment as a sarcastic rebuttal. In fact, I added to his sarcastic comment with one of my own.

I realize I'm stick'en my head in the lion's mouth - where it doesn't belong. But, fire away I guess

Your Uncle Ferd
Tsquare has a history of posts denigrating fNWA guys including calling our '98 strike "proof" that our union failed and that we failed. He's also made posts calling NWA a place where all the employee groups hated all the other employee groups. With this history, I can't give him the benefit of the doubt that you do. That's fine. But none of my other fDAL buds would have made such a post.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 01:01 PM
  #97246  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Frankly it's not about supporting or not supporting Alpa. It's about the process and getting agreements and a career the Dal pilots want. I do not believe that anyone supports an orginization blindly, but sees the shortcomings as items that can be fixed through the process. Nothing comes easy and there is no "easy" button that can be pushed to solve all of the ills.
It's all about the sales pitch. We can read the data, we read the transcripts from the conference calls. We know we are doing well, and we know we are OWED a lot. IF ALPA can't do it for us and gives us a bad sales pitch that is transparent, maybe someone else should try. I bet management doesn't want that. So, they need to come up with a TA that will be voted in by the masses.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 01:17 PM
  #97247  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Bar, I'm assuming the "ratios" are block hours or utilization rates? What is the history about this from C2K that you talked about in a previous post?

Ferd
Ferd-
If you have time to read it, here is how a contractual Block Hour scheme works. The company was supposed to pay cash bonuses to the pilots for exceeding the outsourcing limit. Think that ever happened? Its mighty complex and hard to enforce and like BuckingBar said, the company broke this deal pretty much right after the ink was dry.

E. Block Hour Plans and Planned Percentages
32
33 1. Block Hour Plans
34 The Company plans to schedule no fewer than the following specified number of
35 block hours of Company flying (
block hour plan) in each of the following
36 calendar years:
37
38 2001: 2,212,000
39 2002: 2,267,000
40 2003: 2,346,000
41 2004 and thereafter: 2,443,000
42
43 2. Failure To Meet Block Hour Plans
44 If the Company fails to meet its block hour plan for any year (including any block

45 hour plan as reset), then each pilot on active payroll status on December 31 of
1 such year will be paid a pensionable lump sum bonus equivalent to a percentage
2 of the pilot’s pensionable earnings paid to him in such year, as follows:
3
Percent Below Block Hour Plan % of pensionable earnings
>0 but  
one

>5% but  
two

>10% below Plan three
4
5 Such lump sum will be paid in March of the year following the year in which the
6 Company failed to meet its block hour plan.
7 3. Planned Percentages
8 The Company plans that the total scheduled block hours of Delta Connection
9 flying, expressed as a percentage of the sum of total scheduled block hours of
10 Company flying and Delta Connection flying (planned percentage), will not be
11 greater than the following:
12
Year Planned Percentage
2002 34%
2003 36%
2004 and thereafter 37%
13
14 4. Failure to Meet Planned Percentages
15 If the actual percentage (i.e., the total actual scheduled block hours of Delta
16 Connection flying, expressed as a percentage of the sum of total actual scheduled
17 block hours of Company flying and Delta Connection flying) exceeds the planned
18 percentage for any year (including any planned percentage as reset), the planned
19 percentage of Delta Connection flying for the following year will be reduced by
20 the excess percentage. For example, if the planned percentage in 2002 is 34% and
21 the actual percentage for 2002 is 35%, then the revised planned percentage for
22 2003 would be 35%. The Company will be prohibited from exceeding the
23 applicable planned percentages (including any reset(s)) for any two consecutive
24 years.
25 5. Excused Compliance and Automatic Fixed Reset
26 a. Excused Compliance
27 The Company will be excused from compliance with all of its block hour
28 plans and planned percentages described in
Section 1 E. 1. and 3. and they
29 will be reset in the event:
30 1) on a consolidated basis, the Company
s operating margin (total operating
31 income or loss, divided by total operating revenue) for any two
32 consecutive quarters falls below 95% of the combined positive operating
33 margin (total operating income divided by total operating revenue) in the
34 same two quarters for United, American, Northwest and Continental; or
35 2) on a consolidated basis, the Company has a negative operating margin
36 (total operating loss, divided by total operating revenue) for any two
37 consecutive quarters that exceeds 105% of the combined negative

38 operating margin (total operating loss divided by total operating revenue)
1 in the same two quarters for United, American, Northwest and Continental
2 (i.e., the Company sustains a larger loss by the margin stated); or
3 3) the Company has an operating loss (excluding the effect of the retroactive
4 costs of the PWA) in any two consecutive quarters commencing with the
5 first full quarter after the date of signing of the PWA; or
6 4) the United States gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate falls more
7 than 25% below the Company
s GDP growth rate assumptions as set forth
8 in the chart below:
9
Year Assumed GDP Growth Rate -25%
2001 2.5% 1.9 %
2002 4.3% 3.2%
2003 4.8% 3.6%
2004 3.8% 2.9%
10
11 b. Automatic Fixed Reset
12 The reset of block hour plans and planned percentages for all years pursuant
13 to
Section 1 E. 5. a. will be as follows:
14
15 Block Hour Plans
16 2001: 2,099,000
17 2002: 2,173,000
18 2003: 2,256,000
19 2004 and thereafter: 2,313,000
20
21 Planned Percentages
22 2002 35%
23 2003 37%
24 2004 and thereafter 39%
25 6. Excused Compliance and Negotiated Reset
26 a. If an event in
Section 1 E. 5. a. 1), 2), 3) or 4) excusing compliance, occurs
27 after there has been an automatic fixed reset, there will be no second
28 automatic fixed reset, but the Company and the Association will promptly
29 meet and confer to reset block hour plans and planned percentages at levels
30 appropriate to the circumstances.
31 b. The Company will be excused from compliance with the block hour plans and
32 planned percentages, for all affected years, in the event a circumstance over
33 which the Company does not have control is the cause of such non34
compliance. If the Company is so excused from compliance, the Company
35 and the Association will promptly meet and confer to reset block hour plans
36 and planned percentages at levels appropriate to the circumstances.
37 7. In the event of the merger of the Company with another air carrier, the Company
38 and the Association will meet and confer to agree upon an appropriate increase in
39 the block hour plans and appropriate adjustment of planned percentages.
40

41
Check Essential is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 01:19 PM
  #97248  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: M88A
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
Interesting 7th post you have.

The last four CAs I've flown with haven't sent cards. But they say they will if the opener sucks. Imagine that. The two previous CAs were DPA supporters. I don't know who the diehard ALPA supporter is because I've not flown with one.
How many post do I have to have before it no longer matters?

I think the original point was that it's likely, when they talk about their votes, support for scope, etc, not everyone is telling you exactly what they think. Thus, the disconnect with how many people tell you X but vote Y.
Lysithea25 is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 03:02 PM
  #97249  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Tighter scope = Delta Pilot Jobs = More Job Security

Scope is my #1 issue.

For me, job security trumps pay hikes.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 03:08 PM
  #97250  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
...the company broke this deal pretty much right after the ink was dry.
The beauty of it is that they didn't even have to break it, they just complied witht he sections that excused compliance form the sections we liked.
Sink r8 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices