Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2012, 10:18 AM
  #96381  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
The reality is Parker just opened himself up to asinine costs. RA could literally jack our rates so high that they fail on those costs alone. Dumb move for parker given where DAL is heading and our ability to actually pay and afford that level of raise.

The fact remains that even as a combined carrier, there is a ton of rationalization that needs to occur to make them a successful airline.

I often wonder if this is just APA's version of Texas Holdem with Horton. APA now has an out, even though it will be an ugly process.
I see the company wanting to reduce the DC by a point or two and adding it into the rates to jack up the AA costs higher, (we would be able to add it back into the 401k if we wanted) but it puts more pressure on the new AMR.

Also if the term sheet does get out and the details are released, expect the company to want to focus any and all improvements on the "me too" sections of the AMR deal, so that it will put on the greatest amount of burden possible.

So we might see a push for direct increase of rates to offset the miserable "training pay" that we get now instead of upping the CD rom pay credit. little/no increase to daily pay, vacation pay staying at 3:00/day(increasing vaca pay by 1:00/day is worth around 0.7% of a yearly rate raise PER WEEK of accured vacation), etc.

Just watch for things like that....

Would the AMR deal put a FULL VOTING pilot union member on the new AMR?
Would they get 5% equity stake in the new company?
Scope proposal could be atrocious....

I think DAL will hold off on a "final offer" until they know the result of Parker's attempt.


What a crazy turn of events...
shiznit is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 10:38 AM
  #96382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

I wonder how many DCA and LGA slots the new AMR would have to give up b/c of anti-trust concerns.....

That would make RA's push for LGA swap pure genius.. I would not want to play poker or chess against RA.



Additionally, Star Alliance would suffer a US domestic hit if the "new AMR" stayed in Oneworld.
shiznit is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:02 AM
  #96383  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
We are at the point where there shouldn't even be any talk of concessions of any kind. (Scope, pay, work rules, retirement, etc.) The possibility of US Airways and American making more than us after doing nothing that even approaches what the employees / pilots of DAL did to make our merger work should squash all talk of losing ground anywhere.

That should be our mindset from here on out, if it wasn't already.

If their DAL pay tie in rumor is true, it should be a signal to all Delta pilots to stop underestimating not only what we are worth, but also stop underestimating what we can attain.
WRT DL pilots, yes. What I was getting at was what if the APA caves and allows 88 seat C Series (with a nice sized first class thats about what the small one would seat) DL management will squeal like Ned Beatty that we have to allow that too. Outsourcing is, literally, a religion to them.
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:05 AM
  #96384  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
I wonder how many DCA and LGA slots the new AMR would have to give up b/c of anti-trust concerns.....

That would make RA's push for LGA swap pure genius.. I would not want to play poker or chess against RA.



Additionally, Star Alliance would suffer a US domestic hit if the "new AMR" stayed in Oneworld.
My guessing is that US would have to give up less now than they would've had to pre-slot swap. RA wasn't a "pure genius"... it was a good move for both parties involved.

The DOT, on the otherhand, will just screw the airlines merging. Doesn't matter who the involved parties are.
lolwut is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:18 AM
  #96385  
Gets Weekends Off
 
redship's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: MD FO
Posts: 107
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
I wonder how many DCA and LGA slots the new AMR would have to give up b/c of anti-trust concerns.....

That would make RA's push for LGA swap pure genius.. I would not want to play poker or chess against RA.



Additionally, Star Alliance would suffer a US domestic hit if the "new AMR" stayed in Oneworld.
Seems like Parker deserves some credit also. After all, US Air gained the DCA slots and cash by giving up LGA slots that would/will potentially be forced out due to a merger with AMR. Funny how all this is working out...
redship is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:21 AM
  #96386  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Was there something in their term sheet about 2 88 seat jets for every new mainline jet? Who would fly the 88 seaters?
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:24 AM
  #96387  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
WRT DL pilots, yes. What I was getting at was what if the APA caves and allows 88 seat C Series (with a nice sized first class thats about what the small one would seat) DL management will squeal like Ned Beatty that we have to allow that too. Outsourcing is, literally, a religion to them.
Even if they cave on scope, our contract should be equal or better than what we had before. No scope concessions! We've earned it.

If they get the same pay (plus 3% even), for doing nothing, we have to have better scope, retirement, vacation, insurance, etc.
newKnow is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:24 AM
  #96388  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,747
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Was there something in their term sheet about 2 88 seat jets for every new mainline jet? Who would fly the 88 seaters?
A regional - not only Eagle, I think part of the deal over at AA/Eagle is to allow other carriers (Pinnacle, Skywest, etc) to bid on AA regional flying.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:41 AM
  #96389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by redship
Seems like Parker deserves some credit also. After all, US Air gained the DCA slots and cash by giving up LGA slots that would/will potentially be forced out due to a merger with AMR. Funny how all this is working out...
True on the LGA end, but what about DCA slots that they just recently acquired.... AA and US already have too many slots between them at Reagan...
shiznit is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:47 AM
  #96390  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Default

When the combined American/US Air becomes the dominant/#1 East Coast airline, how long until Delta goes after JetBlue...just sayin??
Clear Right is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices