Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2012, 06:22 PM
  #94981  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
OK, I'm going to play 'Devil's Advocate' here for just a moment, and throw out a scenario, see what you (all of you) think:

What IF...

RA comes to our Negotiating team and says something like this, "Ok, well, we had to buy Pinacle, and we need more 76 seat feed...bla, bla, bla..."

And our NT says, "OK, but they WILL BE FLOWN by DELTA PILOTS!!"

And RA says, "OK, fine, let's put all the Pinacle pilots on the Delta Seniority list, straight date of hire, and on the Delta Pilot Contract."

Or words to that effect.

Now What?

What should our NT say to that? Yes? No? Staple or...?

Discuss.
Simple. The answer is NO. Why? Because that's not what's in SWAPA's scope and it's unreasonable to ask of us something that's not in the contract of our less profitable competitor. To the NMB? Same answer.

Next!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:22 PM
  #94982  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

I thought that's what would happen (stapled) back when DAL bought Com Air and ASA, but when our MEC met with theirs, to discuss a common seniority list, single carrier status, etc. all they (CA, ASA) would talk about was DOH.

Believe me, I am all for taking back ALL of our flying, but now that National represents both groups, I'm just trying to figure out how it's going to happen, and NOT result in a DFR lawsuit, or arbitration, or something other than a staple.
Timbo is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:26 PM
  #94983  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I thought that's what would happen (stapled) back when DAL bought Com Air and ASA, but when our MEC met with theirs, to discuss a common seniority list, single carrier status, etc. all they (CA, ASA) would talk about was DOH.
That's why it didn't happen among other reasons. I say bring on the arbitration.

Oh, and the DC-9 has gone senior to the MD-88.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:27 PM
  #94984  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
That's why it didn't happen among other reasons. I say bring on the arbitration.

Oh, and the DC-9 has gone senior to the MD-88.

Is that just because the 9 is now in ATL and the 88 is in NYC? Or is the 9 senior to the 88 in ATL too?
Timbo is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:34 PM
  #94985  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Is that just because the 9 is now in ATL and the 88 is in NYC? Or is the 9 senior to the 88 in ATL too?
In ATL the captain seat is equal in seniority and the FO is a couple hundred numbers junior on the bottom end.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:35 PM
  #94986  
Line Holder
 
mtbguy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: DAL
Posts: 43
Default Careful with those debit cards

Today my bank informed me my card had been "compromised" with fraudulent charges in last two weeks. The charges were to "TWA corp" in NYC, I haven't been there in a month or so but seems to be linked to airport coffee/food concessions purchases.....

At least the criminals have a sense of humor
mtbguy is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:41 PM
  #94987  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

OK, but how do we 'recover' all the RJ flying, and 'staple' them, legally, without risking an arbitrated list, that might put a whole bunch of -them- in front of -you-?

I think with Richard now making DL the DIP financeir for Pinacle, there is an opportunity, but then I thought the same thing with Com Air and ASA and Compass...none of it worked out, for recovering our outsourced flying.

For obvious reasons, Richard doesn't WANT them all on our list, and on our contract, so I doubt he'd offer it up to our team anyway, but if he wants this done quickly...well, how bad do you want it Richard?

Put up or shut up Richard.
Timbo is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:46 PM
  #94988  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I agree that it needs tightening. It is going to depend on the price as to whether "reversing" it is palatable or not. As a matter of fact, in some of mine I have probably illustrated more of the shortcomings of some of the language than many care to recognize.. And never in any of my posts have I said otherwise. I just said that it is in fact negotiable, and that "not quack quack quack " is NOT a strategy.
Guys, T is a 76 captain...hes looking out for number one. Just let that be understood and you can ignore the theoretical "maybe we could trade some scope and I can get an even bigger pay raise scenarios".
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:50 PM
  #94989  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
OK, but how do we 'recover' all the RJ flying, and 'staple' them, legally, without risking an arbitrated list, that might put a whole bunch of -them- in front of -you-?
You're talking about two different things. If it's a merger, that's managements purview and there's no need for this modification to our scope. If you're inferring that we should accept scope language changes to allow this in order to get around an SLI, that's not legal. You cannot negotiate something for another group. You can only get around an SLI by scaring the hell out of the other pilot group so they give up their legal rights.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 06:53 PM
  #94990  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Hey, there's an idea!

Now all we have to do is get Garry Kelly to talk to them!

We're going to need more kittens...

But seriously, I doubt they would accept a staple if it were a 'merger' and who knows what an arbitrator would do with a 15yr. RJ Capt., but I doubt he'd be stapled to the bottom.
Timbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices