Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
03-30-2012, 09:02 AM
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
03-30-2012, 09:04 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
03-30-2012, 09:07 AM
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
If we don't then its mismanagement on our part with revenues. Why push more seats into lower buckets just to spread the exact same revenue of the flight over more seats on the same flight? What are they teaching at the RASM/CASM schools these days? Fill-em-up no matter what? Its better to carry extra weight for the same total revenue? No wonder there's "no money in cargo".
I guess it really is better to have 3 full 50 seaters than a single 737-800 at 90% load factor because you're wasting that 10%?
I guess it really is better to have 3 full 50 seaters than a single 737-800 at 90% load factor because you're wasting that 10%?
RASM-CASM=Operating profit
What makes the RASM or the CASM matters not. A MD90 could be a 757 replacement, a Next Gen CRj900 could replace a 757. A 737-900 could replace a 757. They all can attach to a jetway and fly 1,000 miles at around Mach .79. (The CRj actually does the profile better than the Douglas product, hey, 50 years changed the way they build wings)
Gloopy, you say they "suck at math." Not really. They suck at forecasting markets five years into the future when an airplane acquisition is really a 15 to 20 year look see. They also tend to screw up and make deals that looked good at the time, but which fade when the variables change.
03-30-2012, 09:10 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Hey quick question, does the pilot group need to approve a rate on the 717 if they decide to bring them on property?
Or is their as predetermined way of setting a rate for a new aircraft type that is brought on property?
Just wondering...
Or is their as predetermined way of setting a rate for a new aircraft type that is brought on property?
Just wondering...
03-30-2012, 09:14 AM
Happy to be here
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
If it is agreed to before the compleation of Section6, yes we have to vote. If it is a LOA after the fact, by policy manual definition, they do not have to send it to MEMRAT.
03-30-2012, 09:16 AM
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
So, my wife bought lottery tickets. Since our paycheck no longer allows a Cadillac a month, or six months for that matter, what would you guys blow a few hundred million on?
Nominations:
or perhaps
or
I'm kinda thinking all three, since two of the three could be leased back and used as a self supporting tax write off. The airplane is a business necessity ... otherwise how could you check on your boat? None would be financially irresponsible since none are really going to drop in value.
Frankly, I don't get why more buyers don't go for an older business jet. The performance, dollar for dollar, is much higher and the parts are cheap. These things don't fly often, so who cares what the fuel burn is when the maintenance & insurance on a new light jet can set you back $300,000 a year anyway.
Nominations:
or perhaps
or
I'm kinda thinking all three, since two of the three could be leased back and used as a self supporting tax write off. The airplane is a business necessity ... otherwise how could you check on your boat? None would be financially irresponsible since none are really going to drop in value.
Frankly, I don't get why more buyers don't go for an older business jet. The performance, dollar for dollar, is much higher and the parts are cheap. These things don't fly often, so who cares what the fuel burn is when the maintenance & insurance on a new light jet can set you back $300,000 a year anyway.
03-30-2012, 09:23 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,538
Just always remember:
What makes the RASM or the CASM matters not. A MD90 could be a 757 replacement, a Next Gen CRj900 could replace a 757. A 737-900 could replace a 757. They all can attach to a jetway and fly 1,000 miles at around Mach .79. (The CRj actually does the profile better than the Douglas product, hey, 50 years changed the way they build wings)
Gloopy, you say they "suck at math." Not really. They suck at forecasting markets five years into the future when an airplane acquisition is really a 15 to 20 year look see. They also tend to screw up and make deals that looked good at the time, but which fade when the variables change.
RASM-CASM=Operating profit
What makes the RASM or the CASM matters not. A MD90 could be a 757 replacement, a Next Gen CRj900 could replace a 757. A 737-900 could replace a 757. They all can attach to a jetway and fly 1,000 miles at around Mach .79. (The CRj actually does the profile better than the Douglas product, hey, 50 years changed the way they build wings)
Gloopy, you say they "suck at math." Not really. They suck at forecasting markets five years into the future when an airplane acquisition is really a 15 to 20 year look see. They also tend to screw up and make deals that looked good at the time, but which fade when the variables change.
I think they are making the same mistake again now with excessive "capacity discipline" while the LCC's collectively have a gigantic order book for growth. Something will have to give there eventually. I also wonder how kindly the legacies will take to LCC's and SWA continuing to poach new market share. I know the sleeping giant will be awakened as soon as they start to widebody flying over the pond, but will it really take that long to generate a massive backlash?
03-30-2012, 09:27 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: DL 7ER F/O
Posts: 249
I think I would find me a couple really nice beavers, and attach a turbine engine to one of them.
03-30-2012, 09:36 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 350A
Posts: 425
A week of vacation (21hrs) is 39 RAW points.
03-30-2012, 09:37 AM
The Brown Dot +1
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Excuse me. I own you. Or will. You shall now your head when typing a post in my general direction. Was your head down? did you say Oh Captain My Captain?
I'll buy this airline by its own assets or something. I will give you a gift, I will say RJs.
Now that I own this airline you may wonder, does FTB want to be a master that is loved or feared?
Both.
I want you to fear how much you love me.
I'll buy this airline by its own assets or something. I will give you a gift, I will say RJs.
Now that I own this airline you may wonder, does FTB want to be a master that is loved or feared?
Both.
I want you to fear how much you love me.
You will be a "firm, but fair master" and even though you are a doctor, you are not a licensed physician. And, if Chakka meat was the secret ingredient on iron chef, how would Bobby Flay serve it?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
