Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2012, 03:51 PM
  #94091  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,016
Default

Atlanta remains the World's busiest airport for another year:

Atlanta, home to Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL), remained top after its passenger total rose 3.4 percent to 92.4 million, while Beijing had a 4.7 percent gain, to 77.4 million
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:06 PM
  #94092  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Jesse
I hear rumors that management wants the contract taken care of quickly.
If taken care of means more outsourced large RJ's or continued Alaska code share abuse, they can keep their COLA and we'll see them in 5 years.
gloopy is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:06 PM
  #94093  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,948
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar

Marketing and Network run the "brand." They decide which division or partner will create their productive capacity. Their decisions are driven by revenue and cost. They don't particularly care if it is a Delta 747 or an Air France A380. Neither do they care whether it is a 757, or a NextGen CRJ. None are old school Delta. None have the nostalgic sensibilities that cloud our judgement. Their considerations are mathematical, pure and simple.


In 2007 Delta did reconnect to the core values to power their way out of bankruptcy. However shareholders demanded a deal and the deal they got was entirely rational from an economic perspective. Delta moved further towards becoming a brand management company ... . Try to find a pair of Levi's made in San Francisco ... the only reason the odds are better for finding a Delta pilot flying Delta passengers is because of ALPA and because of scope.

Bar,

I pretty much agree with your post but have a question on the math: Did their math include the billions dollars of writing off near worthless 50 seat less RJs less than 10 years after purchase? Or to but it another way - what amortization schedule did they use for the 50 seaters - I doubt it was billions to worthless in 10 years.

I'm sure they will make it up with a billion dollar write-off of "Goodwill" or whatever accounting sophistry works at the time.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:10 PM
  #94094  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
After our Board of Directors booted Jim Whitehurst, he found employment at Red Hat. No one had yet figured out how to make free software profitable until Jim got there. Under his leadership, they've done rather well:




I wouldn't call my friend that won a Field's Medal in Ubermath to mentor him just yet. Its not exactly hard to find CEO's that have doubled a company's share price from 2008-2012. Pretty much any of them that have a pulse have those bragging rights.
gloopy is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:43 PM
  #94095  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,443
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The 2010 data you cite has already been admitted to be in error. The total SWA pilot corps was over-counted by around 15%. They divided total pilot group compensation by far more pilots than actually existed...thus lowering the true average compensation per SWA pilot. The 2011 data will show the correct total of SWA pilots.

Carl
Carl, admitted to be in error by who? Several other data sources show SWA total pilot costs in 2010 as 642,300,000.00. Divided by the 162,000 amount you get around 3960 pilots. I think the seniority list at SWA then had somewhere around 4500 pilots. With Mil leave, sick and disabled the numbers seem about right. You can wish them different but when you in front of the nmb the data is the data. Can you sight another source with different numbers?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:49 PM
  #94096  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Carl, admitted to be in error by who? Several other data sources show SWA total pilot costs in 2010 as 642,300,000.00. Divided by the 162,000 amount you get around 3960 pilots. I think the seniority list at SWA then had somewhere around 4500 pilots. With Mil leave, sick and disabled the numbers seem about right. You can wish them different but when you in front of the nmb the data is the data. Can you sight another source with different numbers?
I can't remember if it was LuvJockey or not, but an SWA pilot posted a link to the article where the mistake was outlined and admitted to. It stated that the 2011 data would have correct total SWA pilot numbers. The 2010 data did not.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:58 PM
  #94097  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Starboard Side, weekends & holidays.
Posts: 855
Default

Awesome.. Another 4 days of riding out of ATL and flying back in (over and over and over again). 88 Captains, I know you can (and should) split up the flying any way you want, but going by twos seems to work pretty well...

(I know.. The majority of guys do this already, but for some reason I haven't shot an approach to anything besides 26R or 27L in a month. Tempted to check in requesting 28 just for something new...)
FmrFreightDog is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 05:02 PM
  #94098  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Understand the disconnect between our flight operations management and the network & marketing management that dictate what flying we perform.

Our flight operations management is highly motivated and enthusiastic about the work we perform. They desire happy employees and want the highest quality work from those employees in exchange. They support our operation and give 110%. I like working for them and am happy to go the extra mile for our airline and our customers. Together, we think we make a difference. We are both prostrate to marketing and network management.

Marketing and Network run the "brand." They decide which division or partner will create their productive capacity. Their decisions are driven by revenue and cost. They don't particularly care if it is a Delta 747 or an Air France A380. Neither do they care whether it is a 757, or a NextGen CRJ. None are old school Delta. None have the nostalgic sensibilities that cloud our judgement. Their considerations are mathematical, pure and simple.

Delta's flight operations management has more in common with Comair's flight operations management than they do the network and revenue men. As a labor group, we have failed to realize our commonality with the Comair pilots, who saw their flying outsourced and diversified until they were a shadow of their former selves.

That's why I'm not particularly excited about old-gen tech aircraft for mainline pilots. I know what it takes to win the beauty contest with revenue and network management ... we need efficient, current generation equipment to compete.

---- -----

In contrast, both FedEx and Emirates are vertically connected throughout their corporations. Their senior management sees a real value to performing their own work to ensure the quality of their product. They perceive this quality as essential to their success. They are enthusiastic, top to bottom, in their own operation.

Contrast this to Delta network management who described Go Jets as "the best... ." For reference, GoJets is a division of Trans States, which was fired as a DCI carrier by Leo Mullin's team for sub par performance.

----------

New hires would be foolish to come to a division of a Company where management outsources labor on a pure economic basis. They will only be valued as the commodity they are. Their loyalty and enthusiasm for their employer will be unrequited. They would be much better off with an employer who is "in it to win it."

In 2007 Delta did reconnect to the core values to power their way out of bankruptcy. However shareholders demanded a deal and the deal they got was entirely rational from an economic perspective. Delta moved further towards becoming a brand management company ... . Try to find a pair of Levi's made in San Francisco ... the only reason the odds are better for finding a Delta pilot flying Delta passengers is because of ALPA and because of scope.
This is the most logical and common sense explanation of Delta Air Lines structure!
Thank you Bar...
sinca3 is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 05:10 PM
  #94099  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by FmrFreightDog
Awesome.. Another 4 days of riding out of ATL and flying back in (over and over and over again). 88 Captains, I know you can (and should) split up the flying any way you want, but going by twos seems to work pretty well...

(I know.. The majority of guys do this already, but for some reason I haven't shot an approach to anything besides 26R or 27L in a month. Tempted to check in requesting 28 just for something new...)
If the next guy looks to be doing the same thing then speak up and ask for a leg or legs other than ATL. I have been lucky and 90% of the guys I fly with fly the first leg then we go two's from there. If the guy is a big enough douche to say no after your request, then I'd call in sick and be done with it!
sinca3 is offline  
Old 03-29-2012, 05:18 PM
  #94100  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
If the next guy looks to be doing the same thing then speak up and ask for a leg or legs other than ATL. I have been lucky and 90% of the guys I fly with fly the first leg then we go two's from there. If the guy is a big enough douche to say no after your request, then I'd call in sick and be done with it!
I did a trip with 9 legs recently, me got 3, he got 6. Oh well, if that's how he wants to run it that's okay. I land better the less I do it and after what happened in New York, he needed the practice.



Originally Posted by sinca3
If the next guy looks to be doing the same thing then speak up and ask for a leg or legs other than ATL. I have been lucky and 90% of the guys I fly with fly the first leg then we go two's from there. If the guy is a big enough douche to say no after your request, then I'd call in sick and be done with it!
That's a vast majority of my experience lately too. Originally it was one and one when I first got on, then some did two and two which is kind of eh, but now it seems as if one and then two and two is the norm. Unless they want to do something different which is usually for good reason like how Song flying sometimes warrants splitting one on one to prevent boredom.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 03-29-2012 at 05:35 PM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices