Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2009, 05:38 PM
  #9291  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Friend...who's talking about outsorcing 100 seat jet flying? I'm saying if you want to replace the DC-9 with E-195 then pay DC-9 rates. Hell I won't be flying that E-195, but you will. Do you realy want to fly that for a 20% discount? If you do, ya need a drug test...........
I'd flyit if it meant keeping that plane at mainline to ensure we can get the rates back up. The initial rate is low because we don't have them in property yet. We can get it up to where it needs to be but not if it's given away, once it's gone, it's gone
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:45 PM
  #9292  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Reddog,

So, if the company gets rid of all the smaller DC-9s, what do you propose we do? $121.70 is a negotiated contract rate, which is about $3 less than I was making nine months ago. Another point is that it is for 100 seat flying. The DC-9 covers 100-125 seats right now. Also, the only other legacy to have the 190/5 on property is US Air and they pay their 12 year captains $95 per hour. I'm not saying this to suggest that they are happy with the pay rates, but I can tell you, I bet they are happy to have the jobs and the possibility to negotiate higher rates if and when they get their act together. As someone pointed out earlier, JetBlue just negotiated very high rates for the 195. If we get it, we will too. What I don't understand is why the $121 is so offensive to you when that is what DC-9 drivers got paid last year this time. Would you rather us refuse to fly the airplane and put people on the street just to prove a point? I'd talk to the people on the street to see how they feel about it. But, I think they are telling you on this forum right now.

New K Now

Last edited by newKnow; 06-30-2009 at 06:08 PM.
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:57 PM
  #9293  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

reddog, so do you propose that the E-195s (if they were to be ordered) have Delta Connection painted on the side of them if they aren't paid at DC-9 rates?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:00 PM
  #9294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

The Delta contract has a pay rate for the E190/195. That pay rate would govern until a new contract is negotiated.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:03 PM
  #9295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

The combined pre 9/11 list would have somewhere around 17000 pilots on it. The 2009 list has around 12,400 pilots on it. We arguably are more efficient. But not to the tune of 35%. The loss of 5000 pilots is a result of our arrogance and inability to secure the flying under 100 seats. Get the planes back on the property. Period.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:07 PM
  #9296  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The Delta contract has a pay rate for the E190/195. That pay rate would govern until a new contract is negotiated.
That's what reddog is whining about.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:23 PM
  #9297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
Default

I still say bring all of the CRJ-900's back to mainline!
firstmob is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:50 PM
  #9298  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Friend...who's talking about outsorcing 100 seat jet flying? I'm saying if you want to replace the DC-9 with E-195 then pay DC-9 rates. Hell I won't be flying that E-195, but you will. Do you realy want to fly that for a 20% discount? If you do, ya need a drug test...........


Red,
I agree a higher payrate would be nice but the rate is what it is. We need to start thinking strategically vice tactically. Jet Blue got the 190 onboard with atrocious payrates - their rates were so low it was pathetic, but they quickly got the rate up to a respectable $143. What is even more important a 6 year JB 190 Captain makes $132 and they have been upgrading quicker than that -even though it will most likely slowdown. So a 6th year Jet Blue guy makes more than 90% of our 12 year FO's.
Yes in a perfect world we would match the DC-9 rates, but lets get the planes at mainline and then we can get the rates where they should be. I do; however, admire your passion - ever think about running for office? As a DAL South guy I eagerly look forward to an infusion of "Northern Blood" into our seemingly lethargic Union.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:54 PM
  #9299  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,016
Default

The fact that we are even arguing about this is disturbing. I'm sick and tired of senior pilots thinking it's alright to just let the narrow body flying go away. If you didn't want to fly it for such wages, then why did we put it in the contract? We've made our bed. Our contract's up in four years. We can fix the low rate then. In the meantime, new planes need to be on the Delta list.

Different rumor: I heard they were looking at buying the Shuttle America 175's and putting them at Compass. If this happens, Delta would be able to furlough mainline pilots without furloughing Compass pilots. I hope this rumor is not true, but I've heard it floating around out there.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 07:15 PM
  #9300  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Not Myopic. If an E-195 can replace a DC-9, then pay it at DC-9 rates. Don't really give a Rats A** about someone not yet hired at DAL. Concerned that a DC-9 is parked and that pilot is paid 18-22% less to fly the same range, speed, payload airplane
Reddog, the DC9 is getting parked. What is your better alternative? More outsourcing?

Why do you care? Obviously you are senior enough to hold A320 Captain. You'll be middle of the widebody flying before long. I'm guessing you are worried that YOUR negotiating capital will be used to negotiate 100 to 130 seat jet rates. (it wont, you have nothing to worry about)

We junior pilots who are tired of outsourcing and the excuse that our flying does not pay enough for us to perform, we want the thing on the property. We'll fly it, you don't have to bid it.

We should care about those hired behind us. Our profession is going down the crapper as we outsource more and more of it. Also, as we outsource we have less power at the bargaining table. Get us more flying and we can get you more power at the table to negotiate better rates for you.

Unity = Power
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices