Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2012, 07:10 AM
  #92381  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,596
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
.


Quit with the "reality of the NMB" stuff. The company wants something, there is no other reason to start talks early. Don't forget LEVERAGE, that wasn't used in the joint contract. "Hurry up, Wall St is watching.... We'll get $2 billion in synergies and make it up next time....". We're waiting.....

The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 07:23 AM
  #92382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
Actually there have been several articles written recently describing how US Airways pilot situation makes them much less desirable when it comes to mergers and reduces their marketability.

I am less certain that Delta could be successful (ie money making outcome) doing a true merger without pilots on board than you are. Of course my assumption is based upon us having a union with a backbone. With that, you may well be right after all.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 07:26 AM
  #92383  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
Looking at the third quarter DOT stats, you're right. Just goes to show that more people are being born than you can p**s off.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 07:52 AM
  #92384  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
That is because they have looked into this tactic:

The Simpsons - Half-Ass Work Ethic - YouTube

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 08:05 AM
  #92385  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Great post! The 12 year Cpt rate converted from trip pay shown on APC is higher than your number above but other than that I agree with your logic.

Airline Pilot Central - Southwest | Major-National-LCC
$186.06 is their rate. I used that number instead of the "converted from trip pay" number because I was talking about their work rules, which use the "trips for pay" concept. In other words, if we were to adopt their work rules (including TFP), we would get an immediate 30% increase in pay without even changing our current pay rates. Make sense now?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 08:13 AM
  #92386  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Like it or not, the level of improvements it WILL take for restoration is massive. That's just the straight math and there is no getting around that.

Sorry, Check, I've got to disagree with you on this one. Either we want restoration (or parity with SWA at a minimum) or we don't. You just can't have that if you don't ask for it. And I'm not willing to throw in the towel at this point.
I am all for restoration.
My point was simply that the "opener" can't be judged so easily just based on the size of the pay bump we demand. As sailingfun mentioned, a number that is ridiculously high is just a waste of ink.

I hear you and I'm with you all the way on what it will take to get us back near C2K.
I just don't understand why people think they are going to be able to arrive at some momentous conclusions about ALPA based on the pay rate that is in this opener.

If I was a negotiator I wouldn't even publish an opener. Or if I was forced to, it would be the kind of general statement that everyone on this web forum seems to find unacceptable.

I'm a "total compenstaion" kinda guy. I agree with you on emphasizing the year end W-2. There are a lot of ways to get there besides the pay rates. Let the Wall Street Journal run the headline that Delta pilots got a smaller than expected bump in pay. What they don't put in their headline is stuff like --> Pay us 6 hours per day for vacation and training. Pay us for sitting in Toledo on a 30 hour layover. Lower our medical premiums. Increase in our DC contributions to the IRS maximum. etc. etc. All ways of putting money in our pockets without the headline generating pay rate increases.

I know a lot of the angst is because ALPA has lost people's trust. I'm one of them. The secret deals, the fait accompli joint ventures and LOAs and all that stuff and especially the scope concessions have really hurt our union's credibility. I understand that. But we really have no choice at this point except to trust these guys. The DPA fell short.
ALPA's overall strategy has not been kept secret. They have gone all-in with Moak's constructive engagement. We ratified that strategy when we elected them and we need to stand behind them now.
At least until we see a TA. Then we can judge.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 08:13 AM
  #92387  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
$186.06 is their rate. I used that number instead of the "converted from trip pay" number because I was talking about their work rules, which use the "trips for pay" concept. In other words, if we were to adopt their work rules (including TFP), we would get an immediate 30% increase in pay without even changing our current pay rates. Make sense now?
And THAT'S why you can go to the Southwest hiring thread and see current Delta FOs giving people recommendations on how to fill out their SWA apps. Delta should be embarrassed about that, but somehow I doubt it.
FlyZ is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 08:27 AM
  #92388  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
Default

Was Southwest embarrassed when in the late 90s people were leaving there for AA, Dal, or Ual? Doubt it because there are thousands waiting to take your place.


Originally Posted by FlyZ
And THAT'S why you can go to the Southwest hiring thread and see current Delta FOs giving people recommendations on how to fill out their SWA apps. Delta should be embarrassed about that, but somehow I doubt it.
NERD is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 08:28 AM
  #92389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 115
Default

How many of our guys have signed nondisclosure agreements?
Sobchak is offline  
Old 03-11-2012, 08:35 AM
  #92390  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Sobchak
How many of our guys have signed nondisclosure agreements?
Can't tell you. That's non disclosed information.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices