Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,596
.
Quit with the "reality of the NMB" stuff. The company wants something, there is no other reason to start talks early. Don't forget LEVERAGE, that wasn't used in the joint contract. "Hurry up, Wall St is watching.... We'll get $2 billion in synergies and make it up next time....". We're waiting.....
Quit with the "reality of the NMB" stuff. The company wants something, there is no other reason to start talks early. Don't forget LEVERAGE, that wasn't used in the joint contract. "Hurry up, Wall St is watching.... We'll get $2 billion in synergies and make it up next time....". We're waiting.....
The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
I am less certain that Delta could be successful (ie money making outcome) doing a true merger without pilots on board than you are. Of course my assumption is based upon us having a union with a backbone. With that, you may well be right after all.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
The company might want something. It might be worth 100 million dollars to them. That would not even pay for 1/5 of the improvements I expect for 1 year of the contract. We as pilots often way over value items we think the company has to have. They can do any of the mergers concepts being thrown out now without us.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
USAIR is a well functioning airline at the moment with a totally dysfunctional pilot group. Don't think that lesson is not lost on airline managements.
The Simpsons - Half-Ass Work Ethic - YouTube
Scoop
Great post! The 12 year Cpt rate converted from trip pay shown on APC is higher than your number above but other than that I agree with your logic.
Airline Pilot Central - Southwest | Major-National-LCC
Airline Pilot Central - Southwest | Major-National-LCC
Like it or not, the level of improvements it WILL take for restoration is massive. That's just the straight math and there is no getting around that.
Sorry, Check, I've got to disagree with you on this one. Either we want restoration (or parity with SWA at a minimum) or we don't. You just can't have that if you don't ask for it. And I'm not willing to throw in the towel at this point.
Sorry, Check, I've got to disagree with you on this one. Either we want restoration (or parity with SWA at a minimum) or we don't. You just can't have that if you don't ask for it. And I'm not willing to throw in the towel at this point.
My point was simply that the "opener" can't be judged so easily just based on the size of the pay bump we demand. As sailingfun mentioned, a number that is ridiculously high is just a waste of ink.
I hear you and I'm with you all the way on what it will take to get us back near C2K.
I just don't understand why people think they are going to be able to arrive at some momentous conclusions about ALPA based on the pay rate that is in this opener.
If I was a negotiator I wouldn't even publish an opener. Or if I was forced to, it would be the kind of general statement that everyone on this web forum seems to find unacceptable.
I'm a "total compenstaion" kinda guy. I agree with you on emphasizing the year end W-2. There are a lot of ways to get there besides the pay rates. Let the Wall Street Journal run the headline that Delta pilots got a smaller than expected bump in pay. What they don't put in their headline is stuff like --> Pay us 6 hours per day for vacation and training. Pay us for sitting in Toledo on a 30 hour layover. Lower our medical premiums. Increase in our DC contributions to the IRS maximum. etc. etc. All ways of putting money in our pockets without the headline generating pay rate increases.
I know a lot of the angst is because ALPA has lost people's trust. I'm one of them. The secret deals, the fait accompli joint ventures and LOAs and all that stuff and especially the scope concessions have really hurt our union's credibility. I understand that. But we really have no choice at this point except to trust these guys. The DPA fell short.
ALPA's overall strategy has not been kept secret. They have gone all-in with Moak's constructive engagement. We ratified that strategy when we elected them and we need to stand behind them now.
At least until we see a TA. Then we can judge.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
$186.06 is their rate. I used that number instead of the "converted from trip pay" number because I was talking about their work rules, which use the "trips for pay" concept. In other words, if we were to adopt their work rules (including TFP), we would get an immediate 30% increase in pay without even changing our current pay rates. Make sense now?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
Was Southwest embarrassed when in the late 90s people were leaving there for AA, Dal, or Ual? Doubt it because there are thousands waiting to take your place.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 115
How many of our guys have signed nondisclosure agreements?
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post