Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2012, 04:10 PM
  #91091  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by finis72
Everybody on here has an opinion and 1 vote. I know I'm in a minority but I have always been a realist. I would love restoration but the reality to me is that under the RLA and going to the NMB, that isn't going to happen. Sailing came on here and said he wants 40% but then also stated that it will be a long struggle as the NMB has already hinted to DALPA that we won't get released for a long time (example 1, APA and AMR).
That's not managing expectations, that's reality. Reality is that DL has no incentive to sign a 1 billion plus cost increase for the pilots, period. If anybody can come on here and explain why our Mgmt team would do that I'm all ears. Our current Mgmt team is very aggressive about controlling costs and getting rid of routes that don't make money, sucks for us in the short run. SWAPA/SW is held up as our gold standard yet they are in bed together. Why do they get paid so much ?, maybe because SW makes money every year and they get a pay raise just about every year.

In my prior life I had an accounting degree and our (DL) data is still not pretty, improving but not good. I'm not managing expectations, its just reality.
I sound all doom and gloom but I still think we can get a good contract. It won't be easy and it won't be quick.
This is where you are wrong. DL does have a reason to get this done, as explained to a LCA friend by SD, the second round of consolidation is coming up, and they do not want to be negotiating a contract during that time, and they also want cooperative pilots for another expedited SOC, which we happily did for the NWA merger so we could capitalize on those $2 billion a year in SUPPOSED "synergies.". So, we know more mergers will happen, and that can help speed the process along, and be used to increase our compensation, but ALPA needs to work for it, not just give in for the sake of being nice. We pay big money in dues, and I expect results that aren't just "realistic.". I think we deserve a bit more than that. Don't settle please.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:12 PM
  #91092  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Whether you fill them or not has nothing to do with it. CASM stands for Cost per Available Seat Mile. And the 757-300 is the lowest. The 747-400 is the second lowest.

Carl
I would submit that whether you fill them or not has everything to do with it....casm is a nice metric when you are past the break even point for a hull, when things go south 300 empty seats is more problematic than 100.

Last edited by Seaslap8; 03-01-2012 at 04:34 PM.
Seaslap8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:13 PM
  #91093  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by finis72
Everybody on here has an opinion and 1 vote. I know I'm in a minority but I have always been a realist. I would love restoration but the reality to me is that under the RLA and going to the NMB, that isn't going to happen.
That is your personal opinion, and you're certainly entitled to it.

Originally Posted by finis72
Sailing came on here and said he wants 40% but then also stated that it will be a long struggle as the NMB has already hinted to DALPA that we won't get released for a long time (example 1, APA and AMR).
As I've stated earlier, that is a blatant lie by sailingfun. In the interest of complete accuracy, the MEC has never said this. It's just being said by the MEC's strategic leak and deniability department.

Originally Posted by finis72
That's not managing expectations, that's reality.
It's neither. It's a lie. It never happened. The NMB never said that to us.

Originally Posted by finis72
Reality is that DL has no incentive to sign a 1 billion plus cost increase for the pilots, period. If anybody can come on here and explain why our Mgmt team would do that I'm all ears.
No airline management EVER HAS! In all cases, it's only extracted from them through the RLA process. This time is different because management has apparently successfully spun some folks into believing that the RLA is a hopeless process for airline labor. The easiest way to win is to get your opponent to not fight.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:17 PM
  #91094  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Seaslap8
I would submit that whether you fill them or not has everything to do with it....casm is a nice metric when your past the break even point for a hull, when things go south 300 empty seats is more problematic than 100.
No it doesn't. When somebody like tsquare comes here and infers that the 747's are going away because of fuel costs, then costs are the topic of conversation. Therefore, Cost per Available Seat Mile is the metric to compare one fleet type against another.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:20 PM
  #91095  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
This is where you are wrong. DL does have a reason to get this done, as explained to a LCA friend by SD, the second round of consolidation is coming up, and they do not want to be negotiating a contract during that time, and they also want cooperative pilots for another expedited SOC, which we happily did for the NWA merger so we could capitalize on those $2 billion a year in SUPPOSED "synergies.". So, we know more mergers will happen, and that can help speed the process along, and be used to increase our compensation, but ALPA needs to work for it, not just give in for the sake of being nice. We pay big money in dues, and I expect results that aren't just "realistic.". I think we deserve a bit more than that. Don't settle please.
I agree Bill. You only get paid what you negotiate and when you're negotiating leverage is everything. Thanks to the RLA, I think there is very little leverage one side can have other than time. And for most airlines it behooves them to drag their feet for as long as possible.

This time around I think time is on our side. So what if we blow past the amendable date? What would we be screwing up, the ability to merge?

Well in that case, I say we don't have to be in a hurry. We should just concentrate on getting this done right.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:23 PM
  #91096  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
...... Therefore, Cost per Available Seat Mile is the metric to compare one fleet type against another.

Carl
What does that cost metric do for you if every flight goes out at say 50% load factor?
Seaslap8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:24 PM
  #91097  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL73n's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 737n/FO
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Honestly, I recommend no handguns, they can only get you into trouble. I like the home modifications to double barrelled shotguns, they are effective.

Scambo showing his inner redneck.
Boy, it's great to see a good discussion on L&G about something other than contracts. 2nd amendment forever (and don't try any of this in NY or MA).
DAL73n is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:24 PM
  #91098  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Scambo can defend himself, but he's clearly not part of any echo chamber. He was responding to your constant self-insertions of roadblocks on our path to an industry leading contract. Specifically, "the "NMB will block us...and if they don't, "we'll get a PEB"...and if we don't, "the federal courts will block us from striking". That certainly sounds to me like someone who is quaking in fear...exactly like scambo described.

Carl
If you call FULLY describing the section 6 process as quaking then I'm on the front of a box of oatmeal. You paint a rosy picture of section 6, I don't.

You also failed to answer my second question. Your belief is that since a U.S. Congress has NEVER imposed a contract after a PEB they would never do so. So, I ask again. Has a U.S. District Court of Appeals ever prevented a union from seeking self help with an 1113c imposed contract?? Guess the fNWA flight attendant's found out the hard way, huh?
Rather B Fishin is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:29 PM
  #91099  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin
If you call FULLY describing the section 6 process as quaking then I'm on the front of a box of oatmeal. You paint a rosy picture of section 6, I don't.

You also failed to answer my second question. Your belief is that since a U.S. Congress has NEVER imposed a contract after a PEB they would never do so. So, I ask again. Has a U.S. District Court of Appeals ever prevented a union from seeking self help with an 1113c imposed contract?? Guess the fNWA flight attendant's found out the hard way, huh?

Okay, we'll count you as a yes vote. Next!
scambo1 is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:32 PM
  #91100  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by DAL73n
Boy, it's great to see a good discussion on L&G about something other than contracts. 2nd amendment forever (and don't try any of this in NY or MA).
Probably not 100% legal in a lot more places than those, but when someone waltzes into your house that shouldn't be there, what the distinguished "lady" from San Francisco thinks really doesn't matter.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices