Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-29-2012, 09:35 PM
  #90871  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by freightguy
I am well aware of the RLA. RLA is outdated and a definite slap in our collective faces. Few months ago CAPA (Coalition of Airline Pilots), started a national campaign to amend the RLA. CAPA was able to schedule meetings at the national level to amend the RLA and section 1113C of the bankruptcy code. ALPA never joined the fight for reasons unknown. I called and wrote my reps several times and told them that this should be a very high priority item. But as usual, nothing got done.

Love to know why they never joined the fight. Then again, look at their successes in their other fights. TWA v ALPA, United Pilots v ALPA, their own office staff v ALPA, etc. etc.
TheManager is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 09:36 PM
  #90872  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: New to mother D
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by LuvJockey
Dude, seriously? You chose this post to break your silence?? That could have been written by a Republic pilot.
Can you point to something I wrote that you disagree with on a factual basis?

I'm just trying to make the point that we need to police our own profession. The company or the ATA sure aren't going to. Examining management's arguments might provide instruction as to weaknesses in our own.

In my opinion, it has been far too easy to become an airline pilot in the last ten years. That fact does not improve our leverage at the negotiating table. As such, it's something we need to examine and improve. Getting those flight time requirements passed and enforced should be a top priority at ALPA national, in my opinion.

Relatedly, what is the current turbine PIC requirement to be considered qualified at SWA? It think it fluctuates between 1300-1500. That requirement makes sense. If you're hiring people as Captains, how have they demonstrated that ability if they have not served in said capacity?

Originally Posted by Elvis90
I was hired a year and a half ago with thousands of hours of PIC and instructor time in Air Force aircraft. I believe one person out of 28 in our new hire class had zero PIC time.
You're off by a few.

Originally Posted by Elvis90
had 5,500 qualified applicants when I applied......Our group was pretty highly selective.
Exactly. Getting into that 5500 has become way too easy, and a huge percentage of that 5500 is out there right now flying half of Delta's daily flights.

Originally Posted by Elvis90
average age of our new hire class was about 33 years old. I wouldn't call it youth entitlement...I was 43 when I was hired. My last W-2 from the USAF was about $125,000. That first year of Delta pay was quite a transition.
I was referring to T's comments about pilots who showed up after C2k talking about what they had lost. I wasn't here during 2000 or the bankruptcy either. While I think it's criminal what was done to the pilot group, I cannot state that I was directly effected by that loss.

If I got on at a major airline in my mid twenties never having commanded a high performance aircraft, or with the ability to count on one hand how many times I'd flown a jet aircraft from takeoff to land without an autopilot (and under the supervision of someone else at that), I wouldn't be loudly proclaiming that I deserve the same career prestige and compensation as our Captain ranks, many of whom are more likely to have pounded around thunderstorms hauling night freight, or been over Baghdad in 1991.

Further, I wouldn't be making that argument if I spent my first several years in the industry doing the same job for less and undercutting the pilots who made this career a profession.

In my opinion, ALPA representation of of many of these pilots serves to water down a the professional standard. The fact that so many pilots who have not been subjected to a meaningful standard of selection upon entering the profession are represented by ALPA also handcuffs our union with respect to arguments that they can make that would support (mainline) Delta pilots.

Originally Posted by Elvis90
the company wants the highest qualified candidates applying, then they'll have to compensate them accordingly. These pilots have a high expectation for C2012...if it fails to deliver, then they may look elsewhere for employment.
Delta is not attracting the cream of the crop right now. The guys in the active component where I drill that are even interested in the airlines have Delta as a plan C or D. You said Delta pay was a transition. With your resume, you are literally making half of what you could elsewhere.

Two of your classmates have left for Southwest, and I bet a bottle of Macallan 18 against that Air Force neckerchief of yours that at least one, maybe two will be hauling boxes very soon. My goal is for this contract to reverse that trend.
Whidbey is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 09:42 PM
  #90873  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
BS. That C2K opener was released...period. The company's opener is ALWAYS obscene and ridiculous. This time, our union won't release it. Everyone needs to make their own decisions as to why that is.



Exactly correct! That's precisely why you release the opener to your members. You're going to need their support when it comes to crunch time. Do you realize what it means when DALPA doesn't release it this time? Do you understand that it means either DALPA doesn't care about us supporting their negotiating goals, or they know we wouldn't if we found out what they were?

Carl

I don't understand why everyone is so concerned with seeing the "opener". I don't really care what the opener is, as I am sure that is not what we will end up with. What I care about is what they send out for ratification. If it is weak, it will get voted down. I believe in the majority of our 12,000+ pilots that we can think on our own. Most of us deliberate with our friends, peers, coworkers about the merits of a contract and I believe that we can come to a logical conclusion. Just as we are not all lemmings that will willingly go down the path of "we must give concessions or status quo", we are not all lemmings that will follow the endless path of full restoration plus cola. Reality is somewhere in between these two positions.
1234 is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 09:56 PM
  #90874  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
All you have to do is talk to your reps. They are not going to give details but they will give you a general idea. A survey online by DPA has no validity to what pilots actually put in the real survey they knew was going to be used to construct a opener. Most pilots are very aware that if you over reach under the RLA you end up iced long term. There is a time value to a contract. The Dalpa survey unlike the DPA survey has real implications and pilots who are concerned about maximizing their income and quality of life for themselves and their families put a lot of thought into what they felt was achievable. I told my reps what I had put in the survey and asked how what I put down compared with others. I was told I was right at the mean in the surveys. My upfront raise was 20 percent with ongoing 5 percent raises over the life of a 4 year contract. Total 40. I wanted a lot on the other items and I was told I asked more then most in those areas. My emphasis areas were increasing copilot pay to a 15 year scale taking the max up to 75 percent of CA pay. Sick leave back to the pre 1113 program, DC up to 18 percent, reserve pay 5 hours below ALV with a 70 hour minimum, Vacation and training pay and credit for line construction and actual pay with increases to 4 hours per day for both. Section 1 gross weight maximum reduced to pre LOA 46 weight with current contracts sunsetted. 6th week of vacation restored. Distributed training pays 1 for 1.
I tried to figure a value for all I ask for and am guessing it is worth about 3/4 of a billion per year by the end of the contract. Thats about half the cost of a true restoration contract. Some items such a pay and vacation becoming pay and credit would have to be phased in because they will require several hundred more CA positions. I would give them a 2 year phase in on items like that.
Looks like you were off by 17%, nearly double your response of 20, as compared to the results of the other guys survey's final count.
TheManager is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 10:04 PM
  #90875  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
I was hired a year and a half ago with thousands of hours of PIC and instructor time in Air Force aircraft. I believe one person out of 28 in our new hire class had zero PIC time.



Delta had 5,500 qualified applicants when I applied, and 148 were hired off the street, for about a 2.7% acceptance rate. One was a former F-22 squadron commander. Our group was pretty highly selective.

The average age of our new hire class was about 33 years old. I wouldn't call it youth entitlement...I was 43 when I was hired. My last W-2 from the USAF was about $125,000. That first year of Delta pay was quite a transition.

If the company wants the highest qualified candidates applying, then they'll have to compensate them accordingly. These pilots have a high expectation for C2012...if it fails to deliver, then they may look elsewhere for employment.
Your posts looks to me like it was pretty competitive when you were hired. Cream of the crop even. You were hired under the current contract and in the last 1.5 years, you have gotten a 4% raise with profit sharing. Apparently our current contract was enough to get you and all of the other highly qualified applicants to join the ranks as Delta pilots. I am just wondering what has changed in the last year and a half that requires a major change in pilot compensation to get qualified candidates?
1234 is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 10:19 PM
  #90876  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
Your posts looks to me like it was pretty competitive when you were hired. Cream of the crop even. You were hired under the current contract and in the last 1.5 years, you have gotten a 4% raise with profit sharing. Apparently our current contract was enough to get you and all of the other highly qualified applicants to join the ranks as Delta pilots. I am just wondering what has changed in the last year and a half that requires a major change in pilot compensation to get qualified candidates?
Amazing! All of the MEC members are out in force on APC! Still managing expectations, one APC member at a time...... Hey, we are 4 times as profitable as SWA, we fly large equipment internationally, and a year and a half ago no other legacy was hiring. He probably didn't want to pay for a type rating, and DL supposedly had the best to offer, until ALPA started managing expectations.....
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 10:30 PM
  #90877  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg

Amazing! All of the MEC members are out in force on APC! Still managing expectations, one APC member at a time...... Hey, we are 4 times as profitable as SWA, we fly large equipment internationally, and a year and a half ago no other legacy was hiring. He probably didn't want to pay for a type rating, and DL supposedly had the best to offer, until ALPA started managing expectations.....
Have you considered that the best thing we could possibly do is sign a short term deal (3-4 years) then when all you informed types start punching out (or retiring because APC stress does you in) the rest of us can get to work on a real deal based on the basic market force of supply and demand? What makes you think you're worth more than what the market dictates? Because you ain't flying a 707 or a DC-10. Can you please explain what you're doing in "real life" to artificially shrink our supply or to create demand?

I guarantee the second the regionals can't staff their own airlines, DAL will come crawling to us to strengthen our own scope. I just hope someone will be smart enough to say "We told you so".

And people think the younger generation feels entitled...

Just a thought.
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 10:41 PM
  #90878  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Amazing! All of the MEC members are out in force on APC! Still managing expectations, one APC member at a time...... Hey, we are 4 times as profitable as SWA, we fly large equipment internationally, and a year and a half ago no other legacy was hiring. He probably didn't want to pay for a type rating, and DL supposedly had the best to offer, until ALPA started managing expectations.....
Not sure how you come up with "we are 4 times as profitable as SWA..."

Year 2010:
DAL net income = $593 million
DAL total revenue = $31.75 Billion
SWA net income = $459 million
SWA total revenue = $12.1 billion

So, just by having ALPA start to manage expectations, we went from first to last in best company to work for.
1234 is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 12:22 AM
  #90879  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
Have you considered that the best thing we could possibly do is sign a short term deal (3-4 years) then when all you informed types start punching out (or retiring because APC stress does you in) the rest of us can get to work on a real deal based on the basic market force of supply and demand? What makes you think you're worth more than what the market dictates? Because you ain't flying a 707 or a DC-10. Can you please explain what you're doing in "real life" to artificially shrink our supply or to create demand?

I guarantee the second the regionals can't staff their own airlines, DAL will come crawling to us to strengthen our own scope. I just hope someone will be smart enough to say "We told you so".

And people think the younger generation feels entitled...


Just a thought.
Hi, did you know when our debt is paid down to $10 billion by 2013 our interest payments on that debt decrease by $500 million per year? That's an extra $500 million per year we don't have to pay. Some of that would look great in our pockets, especially since we already gave up our pensions for half of the pilot group. But, you knew that......ALPA sure doesn't advertise that very much. We should go after that, it's called restoration.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 12:25 AM
  #90880  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
Not sure how you come up with "we are 4 times as profitable as SWA..."

Year 2010:
DAL net income = $593 million
DAL total revenue = $31.75 Billion
SWA net income = $459 million
SWA total revenue = $12.1 billion

So, just by having ALPA start to manage expectations, we went from first to last in best company to work for.
How about last year? We made about $1.2 billion net, and SWA made around $300 million. That's 4 times as much. UAL made 6 times more than SWA did. Why do you use 2010 numbers? Manipulation at it's best. Use current data please, you're starting to sound like Sailing......
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices