Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2012, 11:46 AM
  #89281  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by TOGA LK
LOL... I'm digging flying instead of sitting SC!!
The way to differentiate me on SC or on LC is what beverage is in my hand:



Currently, that bottle of beer looks more like a glass of water, so I'm sitting SC right now.

Ah, living in base. I'm going to go type some more all caps troll responses on the rotation survey about commuters.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:46 AM
  #89282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

So when do we get to vote on DPA?
TOGA LK is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:47 AM
  #89283  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The way to differentiate me on SC or on LC is what beverage is in my hand:



Currently, that bottle of beer looks more like a glass of water, so I'm sitting SC right now.

Ah, living in base. I'm going to go type some more all caps troll responses on the rotation survey about commuters.
Lol. Depending what base that could be a good thing!
TOGA LK is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:55 AM
  #89284  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The worst landing I've ever witnessed by an airliner was an ATR on a windy day landing in MGM (I've seen moments after "landing" on 2 FDX MD-10 accidents... those turned out a tad worse.).

They hit hard on the first touch down, bounced and porpoised, hit about as hard on a second touchdown with a similar result, and then finally pancaked into the runway for the 3rd and final touchdown. We were hooting and hollering watching this transpire... "Come on! You've got one more bounce in you!" There likely was not a single unquenched set of butt cheeks on that plane.
Yeah, the weight above the fuselage (fuel, wing, engines, structure) results in odd things happening compared to other airplanes. Once the weight is on the mains, the deck angle results in the weight of the engines (etc) being aft of the gear. In effect, the CG shifts aft at touch down, unless you push the nose over and get that weight forward of the gear (a lot like a 757 if the PNF yanks a lot of speed brake brake at touch down) No problem if you're used to it. If you fly it like any other airplane, intuitive pitch inputs are exactly the opposite of what is needed because the aft CG is pushing the tail in directions that the pilot has to over ride.

Had to fly it on to the runway and continue flying until brake set. It weighs nothing for its size (mostly composite construction). If your FO stopped flying the ailerons during the roll out, you'd go in the weeds. Fortunately, it was certified for that (designed for ops in back country Africa).

If it were a choice, I go fly it if we had it. Something about props are fun.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-16-2012 at 12:06 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:01 PM
  #89285  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
But the most telling part of that memo was Ornstein’s insistence that he, like his peers, is signing contracts that will never make a profit simply to “live to fight another day.” This can only ensure that the regional industry is destined for failure.

Consolidation has been a byword for the global airline business model for years, but that will do little to help U.S. regionals; in fact, it has contributed to their dilemma. Something deeper is required, but for now that solution is as absent as their profits.
That deeper something will be a frantic race to order larger and larger jets to the outsource whipsaw providers. Yet all that would even do is delay the inevitable...unless the seat/size ceiling keeps increasing until it reaches large widebodies.

Even with larger RJ's, these cut throat bottom feeders will continue to underbid themselves just to get the work. They will have to, or they won't get the work in the first place. Sure if an ACMI carrier here or there inks a massive order and goes into hyper growth mode for a couple years, they will be perceived as the place to be and the stock to be in, etc. but as soon as they start to get a little senior and the next RFP goes to someone else and their costs stagnate, they will fall even harder with higher total overhead.

One final source of temporary relief for the sector could be a new era of unprecidented predatory bargaining. Just like JO needs to underbid to get the work, so does every pilot group. I can see in the not too distant future contracts signed that contain not only deep concessions and severe B scales but possibly shocking elements previously unheard of like almost eliminating longevity.

Some will also try, and fail, at being the next IndyAir and/or Frontier. While they will not be successful (not even the St George darling) they will bleed a lot of yields off of everyone in the process.

Ironicaly, the more successful the majors are (legacy, cargo, more desirable LCC's, etc) the more pressure there will be on the pilot labor side of things to "deal me an ace" by any means neccessary to get the work. Yesterday's pay for training will become tomorrows pay for seniority and flight time. Paris-first class-international still requires 1000 PIC and out the door baby, whatever it takes.

And I agree that consolidation in the RFP sector is pretty much meaningless. If a group, no matter how large, starts to gain significant leverage their work will simply be diverted to any low bidder anywhere...or a new start up like CPZ if necessary where things are not only cheaper, but everyone's on first year pay.

Again, the only real way to prevent, or at least to significantly delay, the current trajectory is to give regionals more and more seats so that they can stay in industry wide forever growth mode. And you can bet their managers and many pilot groups will bid as low as they need to go to get the winning bid because if they don't, someone else will. Especially while at the same time bids will be going out not only for growth flying, but current flying as well.

That's why its critical for every airline to lock down its scope. Management can fly whatever size plane it wants, but it has to use the airline's master list to do it. If we don't start figuring out how to reverse outsourcing we're in for a world of hurt. While everyone eye humps section 3 pay tables all day long, going forward all eyes will be on DL, UA and especially AA right now WRT scope.
gloopy is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:03 PM
  #89286  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by fishfreighter
in theory you're correct. However, the company also announced its going to spend $50m to buy back stock. Usually they "buy it back" from the senior corporate officers with stock options. That makes over $300m worth of stock the company has bought over the last few years.



Opinion only:

1. Dal
2. Swa
3. Aa
4. Ygtbmfsm
gloopy is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:05 PM
  #89287  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Omfg I hate you for thinking of that first!!!!!!!!!
gloopy is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:22 PM
  #89288  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,239
Default

So I assume the DAL plan if we acquire ALK will be to consolidate routes shrink and give SEA/LAX to Virgin?
PilotFrog is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:27 PM
  #89289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Are you crazy?

Our management types that read this board need to realize that if they refuse to restore a large portion of this PWA, places like EK will see DAL pilots applying to leave this stagnated career.

These contract jobs and places like EK and their total pilot package need to be where we are aiming.

FWIW, a EK pilot pay 60 bucks a month for medical for his spouse. It is full coverage. No deductible etc. These guys do nothing cheap, and are making 2 bln a year. The only break they are getting is that they do not pay landing fees in the UAE. They buy their jet A from Singapore. I want to start looking at these compensation packages.

Emirates does nothing cheap ....... ? You might want to ask one of your "many friends there", where the flight crew rest area is on the 777. Then get back to us.

You are painting a one sided picture of employment there.
RCD73 is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:36 PM
  #89290  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,759
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
So I assume the DAL plan if we acquire ALK will be to consolidate routes shrink and give SEA/LAX to Virgin?
Well, we know we can't profitably fly those routes, so I'd assume yes.

So instead of Buzz and Gloopy complaining about no West coast flying (legitimately I must say), there would be "EskimoMan" or "ExALK" complaining about losing flying to "VA" and how they used to fly all up and down the West coast. ;-)
iaflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices