Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2012, 08:10 AM
  #89041  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Fair enough. I would still like to ask them if they made the right decision in a few years though. There could be furloughs at FedEx.. or SWA.. or wherever they went.. but I think DAL is going to take off like a rocket when that debt number gets below $10B.. we will see....
T, that's why I'm staying.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:14 AM
  #89042  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
T,

I am not quite sure about that. Of all the guys I know that left, only one even ponders if he should have stayed at DAL. The others don't even look back.

DAL is still one of the better airlines to work. We have a pretty good opportunity for some substantial gains and changing employers is like changing lanes in a traffic jam - what looked so promising can turn sour very fast.

All of that said, I think the important point is that people are in fact leaving DAL. This was totally unheard of prior to 911. This is no longer the DAL of old.

Scoop

PS - Totally agree with your "Anus" of the earth comment. With very few exceptions (Like you need 100K for Vito the loan-shark ASAP ) , life is too short to spend part of it in that region.
The world changed on 9/11. We all know that. Of course DAL isn't the DAL of old. Ron Allen saw to that. Thing is though, all boats are on the same sea now, and DAL will once again be on top where we belong. Your buds aren't looking back right now.. and maybe they won't, but the ones that leave right now or in the coming months certainly will.
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:15 AM
  #89043  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 F.O.
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
No way man, get back here!

We've got some here postulating that Volaris is SWA management's attempt at reducing costs through outsourcing. And that this Volaris deal to MEX is just the first opening of the door. What are you hearing?

Carl
SWA has a different mindset about outsourcing than most legacy carriers. SWA actually WANTS to keep all flying in house because it gives them the ability to control the product that they are producing. Outsourcing can create sub standard service to SWA customers. The maintenance outsourcing that goes on is virtually invisible to the consumer and has much less potential to effect the customer experience (if the mx is in fact performed properly.)

The Volaris code share was set up long before the AT acquisition took place. SWA was unable to perform any near international flying at the time the code share deal was entered into. The Volaris deal allowed management to increase revenue with travel to destinations it was unable to perform at the time the deal was inked.

SWA also had a code share agreement with Westjet, again, that was for flying SWA was not authorized to perform itself. The Westjet code share was canceled.

Management is stating a single operating certificate should be attained in March. The first 800's also arrive in March. GK has stated a desire to serve Mexico and other South American destinations with this airframe. I expect that any Volaris code share will be reduced as soon as SWA has the ability to perform that flying in house, but of course only time will tell. SWA most definitely has plans to greatly increase their international presence well beyond what is currently served by AirTran. Here are some company comments to that effect.



"With the expansion of John Wayne International Airport in Orange County, we had the opportunity to apply for new international route authorities. Similarly, we saw the opportunity to add international service in San Antonio. Because route authorities are limited, these were opportunities that we had to seize if we wanted them. So, we applied, and received approval from the Department of Transportation (DOT).

Of course, the only way to secure these routes is to fly them. AirTran has the capabilities now for international operations, and already has a number of profitable near-international routes. These capabilities and routes were among the many reasons we decided to acquire AirTran. We believe there are more exciting opportunities in near-international flying, and we intend on taking advantage of them. I am hopeful that the recent Orange County and San Antonio announcements are just the first of several new international routes to be announced. For now, new international routes will be flown by AirTran. However, all AirTran domestic and international flying will ultimately move to Southwest as aircraft are converted. It just takes time to both build international capabilities at Southwest, and convert the AirTran aircraft."

"I can assure you that our project teams are working tirelessly on these important strategic projects, and are actively working to bring international capabilities to Southwest in the timeframe needed for us to convert the aircraft and international flying."


"Today, we notified WestJet of our intent to terminate our agreement with them to offer connecting service between the United States and Canada."


"We’ve received U.S. DOT approval for our new service to Mexico! Starting June 3, 2012, our subsidiary AirTran Airways will start daily, nonstop service between Orange County, Calif., and both Cabo San Lucas/San Jose del Cabo and Benito Juarez International Airport in Mexico City. In addition, to enable us to keep the AirTran 737-700s used on the international service “route-able” through the AirTran network, on the same day AirTran will add one daily roundtrip between Orange County and both San Francisco and Las Vegas."


"As part of the announcement, we will also, beginning on May 24, have new AirTran daily nonstops between San Antonio and Mexico City, as well as four weekly roundtrips between San Antonio and Cancun. This new service to Mexico is in addition to our existing four daily AirTran flights between Atlanta and San Antonio, all of which operate from Southwest’s gates on Terminal B. I believe there are even more exciting opportunities in near-international flying, and we intend on taking advantage of them. I am hopeful that the recent announcements are just the first of several new international routes to be announced."

"This is all about offering routes that our Customers want to fly, looking to the future, and leveraging the international capabilities that AirTran provides us today."
CRJAV8OR is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:15 AM
  #89044  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'll bet you right now they are not regretting that move.
I wish you would get hired there.
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:16 AM
  #89045  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Fair enough. I would still like to ask them if they made the right decision in a few years though. There could be furloughs at FedEx.. or SWA.. or wherever they went.. but I think DAL is going to take off like a rocket when that debt number gets below $10B.. we will see....
Hope your right about us taking off.

As far as working over in the UAE, my best friend from college is working a security type job (he disappeared into the black world when we were still in the USAF and I haven't know what he does since) in Abu Dhabi. I went and hung out with him for a couple of weeks last year and it's a weird place. No, western women don't have to "suit up" (his words, the locals don't wear all that stuff at home). Dubai very neat and clean (ie very new) but you're still just the hired help and you're talents are welcome but you're not.......if that makes any since.

And, lastly, what has been said for tax stuff is way off. He makes BIG bucks and I can tell you his taxes are a mess. His US corporation takes care of all of it and they are at least 2 years behind.

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:21 AM
  #89046  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Some A schedules are up.
Check THIS out! Pretty much sums how much time got cut in NY...
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:25 AM
  #89047  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by CRJAV8OR

"This is all about offering routes that our Customers want to fly, looking to the future, and leveraging the international capabilities that AirTran provides us today."
Who needed who in that "merger" again?
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:29 AM
  #89048  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Check THIS out! Pretty much sums how much time got cut in NY...
All domestic again? I need another TOE next month.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:41 AM
  #89049  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Check THIS out! Pretty much sums how much time got cut in NY...
Hey, I thought you were out line-check-blitzen

Oh wait, sitting on a jumpseat for a month........I guess that is like a rock
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:55 AM
  #89050  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 F.O.
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Who needed who in that "merger" again?
Who needed who is completely irrelevant. The fact of the matter in this acquisition scenario the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. AirTran offered improvements to Southwest's capabilities and vice versa. The combined company is better positioned for growth than either of the stand alone corporations were separate.

Many on this thread have hypothesized stagnation and increasing outsourcing at SWA. Increased outsourcing will require huge scope give aways from SWAPA. Anything is possible, but I have a hard time seeing a scenario where SWAPA has a desire to go down a road that has proven to be incredibly devastating to multiple other pilot groups. Only time will tell.
CRJAV8OR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices