Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2012, 07:17 AM
  #89021  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
OK, you've adequately explained how this code share is different than our DCI contracts, and that it might be saving SWA money. But it doesn't address the time problem associated with getting your own route authority and gates, etc. If SWA is still using this code share and not their own equipment in another year or two, then you'll be right. My bet is that they won't. We'll see.

Carl
I'll agree that only time will tell.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:19 AM
  #89022  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Our current scope for small jets is a quantity and size limitation at 76 seats and corresponding aircraft weight.
It is no such thing. The RAH scope violation through a creative interpretation of the language leaves us with no real limitations since DALPA has refused to file a grievance. DALPA's reasoning? Management found a loophole in our Section 1 (that ALPA lawyers negotiated), and if we grieved it...we'd would lose.

Originally Posted by slowplay
It is my view that Delta pilots already own all flying above this sized aircraft (sub 100 seat),
That may be your view, but ALPA lawyers don't agree with you. ALPA lawyers simply say that Delta management have found a loophole in our Section 1 language. Delta pilots don't really own ANY of their flying.

Originally Posted by slowplay
but putting the genie back in the bottle at 76 seats will be very difficult absent further change in the regional space.
It might be difficult, but it takes a bargainng agent who actually wants to do that. It has nothing to do with "further change in the regional space." It has everything to do with a bargaining agent that states it as one of the highest priorities...or even a priority at all. But of course, DALPA is completely SILENT on this subject. Why?

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:24 AM
  #89023  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
You can do your own math problem. Do the same over all labor groups. Then look at those "guaranteed profits" that have pushed PCL to restructure either in or out of court, and caused SKYW Inc to start losing money. And remember we're working for a less than 3% margin business all in. btw, that's good news, it means we're profitable.

Maybe the conventional forum wisdom on "guaranteed profits" doesn't stand up to the light of 10-K's...
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
What's your point?
His point is: "Ladies and Gentlemen...calm down. You simply have to understand how managment views this. Try to not be so self-interested and appreciate how hard it is to be management in an industry with 3% margins."

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:26 AM
  #89024  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
... THE MEC IGNORED THE RESOLUTIONS OF DELTA PILOTS and divested Compass pilots from our representational structure.

That is our track record when it comes to the amount of effort the Delta MEC will put into recovery of Delta flying.
Exactly correct!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:27 AM
  #89025  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Whidbey
At least two from my new hire class (2010) have already left and several more are actively interviewing elsewhere.

There is an incredible pay disparity between what we are paid and what our brothers at SWA and FedEx are paid. It's been interesting to watch so many on APC be unwilling to accept that.
This is so true. Really hard to understand.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:27 AM
  #89026  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
T,

I am not quite sure about that. Of all the guys I know that left, only one even ponders if he should have stayed at DAL. The others don't even look back.

DAL is still one of the better airlines to work. We have a pretty good opportunity for some substantial gains and changing employers is like changing lanes in a traffic jam - what looked so promising can turn sour very fast.

All of that said, I think the important point is that people are in fact leaving DAL. This was totally unheard of prior to 911. This is no longer the DAL of old.

Scoop
Two people in my new hire class of 28 (in 2010) have departed for SWA.

On a separate thought, UCal's profit sharing was $265M or 5% of employee's pay, while DAL's was $264M and 4.85%. Remarkably similar.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:30 AM
  #89027  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by il0101
Does anyone know how the buddy passes are prioritized at the gate? If I issue a pass it goes by my hire date, but what if my buddy is sitting at the gate with a buddy pass rider issued from a regional and they had a hire date earlier then my DL hire date? Does the regional buddy pass go ahead of mine?
It is by DOH. Both DCI and DAL passes are S4. Basically a DCI buddy pass with an earlier DOH is better than a DAL buddy pass with a later DOH.
rahc is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:31 AM
  #89028  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Blockbuster: Boeing locks in largest-ever order
Blockbuster deal: Boeing locks in its largest-ever order - USATODAY.com
capncrunch is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:33 AM
  #89029  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,016
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
Two people in my new hire class of 28 (in 2010) have departed for SWA.

On a separate thought, UCal's profit sharing was $265M or 5% of employee's pay, while DAL's was $264M and 4.85%. Remarkably similar.
I'll bet you right now they are not regretting that move.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 07:33 AM
  #89030  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Even more so when you compare their advancement to our (what is it now, 4 or 5 bids) which have seen junior members displaced. That's what looks most bleak at the moment.

Delta has a very rich history of being an excellent employer. Delta likes to recall those romantic notions about itself. Today I again heard Richard Anderson's recorded message about sitting at the desk of C.E. Woolman. That resonates with long time Delta people, like my family. The reality is that CE Wollman would not approve of Delta's outsourcing. He had pride in doing this job better and believed only Delta employees could do it best.
Wow! Another excellent post. Totally agree.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices