Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2012, 11:21 AM
  #87911  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by ilinipilot
I would be OK with giving guys retiring some medical coverage but it has to have A LOT of benefits for the junior guys. The senior group that wants early outs is directly responsible for the NEGATIVE turn our profession has taken, RJs, then bigger RJs, age 65, and at the union level continually selling out junior folks to benefit themselves at the top.
I am sick and tired of caving into them even if it means we move up a few spots.
Speaking of moving up a few spots since when do you think any kind of mass retirement will spur an equal amount of hiring, IT WONT. look at the numbers so far all an early retirement will do will let delta reduce headcount and capacity inline with retiring pilots. it will let the greedy guys pick up more with green and white slips and we will see a decling pilot workforce. PLus delta is not stupid they will hire at the last possible minute before the busy summer season and not a moment too soon. know what that means, capped reserve days understaffing, no trip trades, reroutes etc.
I say you want an early retirement fine then we need a LARGE pay raise first and then a minimum pilot floor has to be established so we dont get screwed again in the process
First.. you are spot on about the use of the term.. "few". The numbers that would leave would be insignificant.. I have seen this movie before.. and if we were to get the second bold statement, that would invalidate the first one. Big pay increase would mean that many wouldn't leave. Catch 22. I think spending any negotiating capital on early retirements is a waste of time and resources.
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:22 AM
  #87912  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by tallplt
Hockey,

A few months ago, I had a 103 fever, nausea, joint aches, night sweats, etc. upon returning from a 72 hour ACC layover. I called UHC and was told by their nurse to run, not walk to the ER, as everything sounded ominously like malaria. I specifically asked if I needed to do anything to make sure the visit was covered. She said I was all set.

The good news is, I was diagnosed with only strep throat (no idea it could be so
bad--the above symptoms lasted almost a week). The bad news is that I got a bill for $3700. UHC turned it down, saying "strep throat is not an ER-worthy event." Hey a$$hats, how would I have known it was strep without going to the ER (like your representative told me to!).

Further good news: you can appeal the denial. Instructions are on the website. I sent them a letter explaining the situation, and they covered the charge. While it shouldn't have come to that, at least I wasn't out the $3,700. The appeals process took me about a month (getting daily calls and letters from the hospital's billing department (later collection agency)).

Good luck.
Wow. Unreal. Did those vampires snipe your credit in the meantime?
gloopy is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:22 AM
  #87913  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Only if it had a stipulation that gave all over 60 today, and in the future as soon as they turn 60, a very limited time to punch out. Otherwise we would be subsidizing a ton of guys retiring exactly when they were planning on retiring anyway. And most guys across the industry don't have a frozen A fund capped at age 60 so once that group punched out we would have stagnation again plus be on the hook for everyone retiring prior to 65 for personal reasons at the exact date they were going to do so anyway.

Egggggggsactly!
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:26 AM
  #87914  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by DAWGS
Our 100 seater!

1984 Boeing 737-232, Kansas CIty KS - 98358132 - Aerotrader.com

Imagine "Spirit of Delta II"- About what our employees could afford today.
That's an entertaining thought, the employees buy an airplane the company wants to outsource. I say we buy a E-190 or C-Series when that gets to flying. That looks btw like a great cockpit and cabin in that thing.

Originally Posted by One Taco
Did no one else find the winning touchdown last night completely un-sportsmanish?
I like what they said on ESPN- who'd thought scoring the game winning touchdown with less than a minute to go was a mistake.

Of course the coach was right, there is no guarantee that they'd make the FG either. But going back to Auburn's NC win they kicked a FG as time expired. It was better for them not to have scored because it gave Oregon time to respond.

Originally Posted by Timbo
I hate to say I agree with a Super Model (see Zoolander) but she's right!

Also, Tom Brady dosen't play Defense...there are 11, no wait, 12 men on the field who do that...

FLAG! Too many men on the feild!

But isn't that the Coaches fault?

And Scambo, check your PM's. Incomming.
There were balls dropped for the Pats, but, that was a bad throw. If we can now throw out the idea that running the ball and defense wins championships then we need to acknowledge that just because it hit your hands doesn't mean it was catchable. That's lazy commentary by former players.

Originally Posted by newKnow
I guess she forgot that Brady had a QB rating under 60 in the AFC Championship and threw two interceptions. They wouldn't have even been in the Super Bowl if it weren't for those guys who dropped the ball.

Brazilian or not, she gets a fail on that one.
That's true New. She was heckled and didn't respond well.

Originally Posted by gloopy
Yeah we help so much they still are robotically trained to walk towards outsourcing like zombies. 60% of our flights being outsourced and we have to stay super cheap on a bankruptcy emergency contract with only cost of living adjustments and work rule tweaks and maybe some more scope relief? H. E. Cool J. NO!
Gloopy for President.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 02-06-2012 at 11:41 AM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:37 AM
  #87915  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: DL 7ER F/O
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by Wingnutdal
FA rumor alert. New retirement package with healthcare due out any day. Already a done deal.
Why would the company offer early outs for our group unless they wanted to either replace or outsource that flying? Have the sick call rates for our older coworkers been elevated such that paying to retrain their replacements is monetarily beneficial to our company?
Rudder is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:39 AM
  #87916  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
My 14yr. old daughter broke a bone in her foot last year at gymnastics practice, so I take her to the ER, Xrays show the break, they put her in a hard cast for a month, then the inflateable velcro boot.

Then I got a bill for over $2,500, for the ER, the Xrays, the cast, and get this, the boot...that alone cost $375!!
We had a baby early last year, that meant for the rest of the year every sick visit was paid in full by us and my son hit his deductible so that was $1000 there. Then my daughter had an ER visit, $1500 and we owed $950. I think between all our visits we paid $3K or $4k out of pocket before you count premiums.

It'd been half that if the Children's Urgent Care center hadn't told us (10 minutes to closing) that we needed to go to the ER and have a plastics guy repair it. We went to the ER guy did it, not plastics. The trip was unnecessary.

Suspicious? yes.

Now I have a huge bill coming because my son had a respiratory virus. Required an ambulance ride... $$$$$$... and multiple days in the hospital.... $$$$$$... every doctor that saw him said he looked good but he had to sleep the night without ever having O2. So they'd keep him for days to wait and see.

The double whammy hits you though in that when a dependent or spouse is in the hospital you have to PD. So not only on our insurance are you going to get hit by a sky high bill but you also lose income and have to go to the bank.

I think if a spouse or a dependent is hospitalized, easy to verify, it's a sick call.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It is very bad that we have only one option other than those administered by UHC.

UHC knows they do not have to compete for our business. UHC knows they've lobbied and gotten exemptions to regulation, which makes them immune to our attempts to get help from the Agencies which should ensure this is a fair exchange between consenting parties.

UHC does not just suck. They're unaccountable and know from their position of monopoly power that you're impotent to do anything about their malfeasance.

Under law, you should be able to get a copy of your policy and review it. With UHC, they will claim their contract is with Delta, not you. Therefore they do not have to respond to you. That leaves you dealing with a department at Delta which mostly does not exist after bankruptcy. Further, I'd guess you put your career at some jeopardy when you finally find someone over there to talk to (who is also powerless to challenge UHC) and get angry.

In our case, UHC's coverage was worse than having none at all. Our kid's bill was 400% higher because of the in network contract UHC has with our local hospital. UHC could not explain why their contracted rate was so high. Further for one procedure the "out of network reasonable and customary cost" was $374. "In Network" that same "reasonable and customary cost" was a little over $1,800.

UHC refused to let me see any of the contracts. I refused to pay the higher version of "reasonable and customary." Eventually the CFO of the Hospital was fired and his replacement proudly posted on his Facebook page the news of his promotion and his election as President of his Neighborhood Association. With that information I informed him that I would have a process server deliver my lawsuit to him at his neighborhood's Christmas Party.

We should not have to resort to jerk moves like that to avoid getting ripped off, but since we don't have the ability to lobby congress, a guy's got to be creative to ensure fairness.
To make sure I have this right, imo it sounds like UHC likes to get it's hand in the Delta money pie and take as much as you can which is a benefit to UHC and the hospital and a loss to Delta. The only problem is we pay a huge portion of that, so they're screwing us and our employer.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:46 AM
  #87917  
Line Holder
 
Cohiba's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 96
Default

IF you have the Gold HRA...your medical plan does in fact cover emergency room visits at 80% after the deductible is met. Using your logic (and words), Delta isn't putting your child's life at risk--you would be. Why use the Gold HRA when you use the HSA or the Option N. When you buy insurance, you are playing the risk game. I prefer the HSA because the $$ figures are pretty cut and dry. I don't have to play the FSA guessing game and I put in the max HSA each year. If something unusual happens (e.g. an unexpected emergency room visit) and I really do need to go to the emergency room; then I go and tap into the HSA if need be.

Your rhetoric saying our insurance doesn't cover is plain wrong. It does cover. Its expensive though.

Last edited by Cohiba; 02-06-2012 at 11:57 AM.
Cohiba is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:55 AM
  #87918  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Cohiba
IF you have the Gold HRA...your medical plan does in fact cover emergency room visits at 80% after the deductible is met. Using your logic (and words), Delta isn't putting your child's life at risk--you would be. Must be a junior college drop out.....what a dolt.
This is a correct statement. However since the HRA is so high of a deductible, I switched to the PPO this year. It's sad to say, but the healthcare at the junky regional I was at was far far superior to what we have here.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:55 AM
  #87919  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

A trash hauler doing a heck of a demo last year at Paris:

Aviation Video: C-130J Demo 'Paris 2011' *In Cockpit* | Patrick's Aviation
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:11 PM
  #87920  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Express pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
This is a correct statement. However since the HRA is so high of a deductible, I switched to the PPO this year. It's sad to say, but the healthcare at the junky regional I was at was far far superior to what we have here.
Agree, getting my son tubes in his ears $2800
Express pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices