Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2012, 06:16 AM
  #87671  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: MD musical chairs
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
If the Delta pilots think that nonrevving on DCI is unfair, and the DCI pilots think that nonrevving on DCI is unfair, then maybe it is fair and what we really need is more open seats.
I frankly don't care what DCI pilots think. They should board behind DAL employees on all Delta brand flights. Furthermore, explain to me how a bunch of empty seats are good for employees of an airline again?
The Cavalier is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 06:45 AM
  #87672  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
Carter cancelled the program...Reagan resurrected it as part of strengthening the military (remember the failed "Desert One" mission to free hostages in Iran). It's a mature system now, and has been used sucessfully in every US conflict since 1997.
The back story was that President Carter had been briefed on stealth technology and was advised the B1 would rapidly become obsolete. He cancelled the program, but could not defend his logic due to the classified nature of the stealth program at that time. Reagan (not yet President) did not know about stealth and saw the B1 as a populist jobs program. Once elected, he kept his promises.

The B1B has been adapted to fight in ways not envisioned by its creators. If this aircraft had stuck to its original mission profile (high altitude bombing over the Soviet Union) it would have been target practice for trailer dwelling missile swine.

IMHO Carter was a submariner and stealth resonated with his ideas about war fighting.

BTW, what have those guys got against the great State of Nevada? Those landings are uglier than my attempts to land an MD88 in a crosswind.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 06:55 AM
  #87673  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

a voice of sanity and reason ^
727C47 is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 06:55 AM
  #87674  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
In two years I've gone from seniority number 9xx to number 5xx and I'm closer to the bottom now than I was six years ago.

This sure isn't working out.
I dont want to harsh on you but I'm curious why you have done nothing to improve your station. I went to the same flight school you did, at the exact same time you did and I've been at the majors since the end of 07'. To get there, I had to change airlines a number of times and move towns an equal amount. You have stayed at the same sinking ship for ten years and done nothing to fix your situation. Can't figure out for the life of me why you stay. Does not compute. Help me out. Why would you stay right seat at ComAir for 10 years?

I'm not trying to be mean but you need a kick in the a$$. Move on already. Damn.
capncrunch is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 06:56 AM
  #87675  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The back story was that President Carter had been briefed on stealth technology and was advised the B1 would rapidly become obsolete. He cancelled the program, but could not defend his logic due to the classified nature of the stealth program at that time. Reagan (not yet President) did not know about stealth and saw the B1 as a populist jobs program. Once elected, he kept his promises.

The B1B has been adapted to fight in ways not envisioned by its creators. If this aircraft had stuck to its original mission profile (high altitude bombing over the Soviet Union) it would have been target practice for trailer dwelling missile swine.

IMHO Carter was a submariner and stealth resonated with his ideas about war fighting.
The B-1 was designed for low-altitude penetration, which was a follow-on to the failure of the XB-70 mission, which was a 6-engine trisonic high altitude penetration bomber. After Francis Gary Powers was shot down in his high altitude U-2, the USAF scrapped plans for the XB-70 and designed the B-1. It has a low radar cross section for an aircraft it's size (1/100th of a B-52), but it's definitely not stealth.

I agree that the B-1 has adapted to missions not envisioned by its creators. When low altitude surface to air missiles got more effective at lower altitudes, that mitigated the low altitude threat.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 06:59 AM
  #87676  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
BTW, what have those guys got against the great State of Nevada? Those landings are uglier than my attempts to land an MD88 in a crosswind.
That's easy - they don't get much flying time, plus it's a very young crew force. Another reason might be they got bad instruction from me.

I'm learning that the MD-88 is a classic "real man's" airplane. I've enjoyed flying it...I better enjoy it, because I'll be on it a LONG time!
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 07:01 AM
  #87677  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I would rather have a vasectomy sans pain killers than to live in the same state as the Georgia Bulldogs... of course that is one up from living in the same state as the gators..
One's preference for location aside, I have to say this only works as hyperbole. As someone who has the frozen veggies on the jewels as I type, and has nearly passed out twice within the last 12 hours, I'd have to say 'sans the pain killers' .... ugh, just hard to think about right now. And I know you are TIC, but still!

And while we're on the subject, I remember this coming up some weeks ago as a topic on the 'Latest and Greatest.' Personally, it took me quite a while to come to this decision, as I was trying to weigh the needs of our family, against what you might call religious reservations. The most difficult aspect of it is that too often the guys you might want to ask are precisely the same guys who are too close to ask such a personal, private question.

The funny part was that the doctor was asking me yesterday how I wrestled with the decision because he saw me bring my bible into the consultation (I always bring my own reading material to places I expect to wait around - to make good use of my time). Anyway, I won't get into all the issues I myself had to weigh, but I just wanted to lament the reality of how taboo the subject is - to the detriment of ever finding good council.

"Peas out"
One Taco is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 07:03 AM
  #87678  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

That runway at nellis has a pretty severe down-slope, and you'll often have to land with a tailwind because of noise and proximity to the city. Gets short in a hurry if you land a little long or try to finesse the touchdown too much.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 07:13 AM
  #87679  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by One Taco
Personally, it took me quite a while to come to this decision, as I was trying to weigh the needs of our family, against what you might call religious reservations.
There are many billions of planets in our galaxy and there are billions of galaxies in the universe, do you really believe the creator of all this cares what you do with your junk?
capncrunch is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 07:15 AM
  #87680  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
I'm learning that the MD-88 is a classic "real man's" airplane. I've enjoyed flying it...I better enjoy it, because I'll be on it a LONG time!
Guess with this next bid I'll have to re-read "Fate is the Hunter."

The only crosswind landing technique that seemed to work as to bug the speeds up until the Captain started complaining... then back that off by 1 knot to silence his warning.

Can we bring back the inflatable rat and march around Crew Planning's cubicle? Sure, it's an impotent move, but cathartic none the less. Four years of displacement bids simply, suck.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices